Search found 20 matches
- Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:59 pm
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Can I create a generic Windows OEM unattended from Dell CD?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1926
Get a retail disc instead and make it unattended. http://unattended.msfn.org/unattended.xp/ The files that tie the CD to Dell hardware is the oembios files. oembios.cat oembios.bin oembios.dat oembios.sig To get a retail disk to accept OEM keys, setupp.ini has to be edited. Otherwise it'll only acce...
- Sun May 24, 2009 1:28 pm
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: A different way to slipstream and install
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6042
Tip: Don't use the key on the sticker. Use a Keyfinder to see the key used in your already installed windows - it's diferent. Please note it on some paper and use it when installing. After installing, your windows will be already activated. Yes, this is important.You must use a factory key. Do not ...
- Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:14 am
- Forum: Update Pack Addons
- Topic: [Request] IE7 Final Addon or Silent
- Replies: 43
- Views: 18020
I saw somewhere a standalone version made of the IE 7 browser, Like you can run from a usb stick kinda thingy (can't remember where). Personally I hate apps that integrate to deeply into the OS. The fact that IE 7 does it (and perhaps even more than before) is truly a step in the wrong direction. My...
- Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:41 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Netframework 2.0 discontinued ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2952
- Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:16 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Netframework 2.0 discontinued ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2952
- Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:40 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Netframework 2.0 discontinued ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2952
Netframework 2.0 discontinued ?
Is Netframework 2.0 discontinued ?
Can't find it anywhere, even after searching...
Can't find it anywhere, even after searching...
- Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:11 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: RyanVM Update Pack 2.1.1 - Released August 14, 2006
- Replies: 91
- Views: 33282
I see you can D/l both the latest update pack and the integrator from softpedia. Could perhaps lessen the burden on Ryan's server.. RyanVM Update Pack 2.1.1 http://download.softpedia.com/software/os_enhance/RVMUpdatePack2.1.1.7z http://download.softpedia.ro/software/OS%20ENHANCE/RVMUpdatePack2.1.1.7...
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:58 am
- Forum: Update Pack WPI Addons
- Topic: WPI sif and tools please advise a.s.a.p. many thanx!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9212
Uhh, that's cool. If I drop the WPI folder into the plugin folder (since I already have it downloaded) will that work/be accepted with integrator 1.41 ? Also wondering, heard that Netframework can't be installed via svcpack. Since I have that in my WPI setup, should I choose runonceex then, or does ...
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:54 am
- Forum: Update Pack WPI Addons
- Topic: WPI sif and tools please advise a.s.a.p. many thanx!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9212
Answer to first question= No The tools are not needed to run WPI.(they can be helpfull however). My WINNT.SIF looks like this, and it will give you the option to choose which partition to install to. You can delete and create partitions to. [Data] AutoPartition=0 MsDosInitiated="0" UnattendedInstall...
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:40 am
- Forum: Update Pack WPI Addons
- Topic: Tiny Question
- Replies: 0
- Views: 7607
Tiny Question
I noticed that the "cmdlines.txt" in the $OEM$ folder has the
line Runonceex.cmd without quotes.
Does that matter, or should I add quotes to it before testing a install ?
"Runonceex.cmd"
(Don't wanna go thru a tedious Windows setup only to find out it need to be quoted to work)
line Runonceex.cmd without quotes.
Does that matter, or should I add quotes to it before testing a install ?
"Runonceex.cmd"
(Don't wanna go thru a tedious Windows setup only to find out it need to be quoted to work)
- Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:17 pm
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: [ISSUE] Invisible 20% usage causes computer to pause every o
- Replies: 21
- Views: 4630
Shows "System Idle" at 99%, yet CPU Utilization at 19% - simultaneously :shock: I've seen systems do that before, especially if youre using a Celeron cpu and has little ram installed. Dis this issue arise from after installing a "Ryan's update pack XP" or are the 2 not connected ? As you obviously ...
- Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:48 pm
- Forum: Switchless Installer Discussion
- Topic: New security update for .NET Framework v2.0 (KB917283)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3259
I did a search for the word "windows installer 3.1" and can't find it in that article ? In big letters I do see "Supported Security Update Installation Switches" though... On that page they have a link that further explains the supported installation switches: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262841 ...
- Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:15 pm
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
- Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:37 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
Ok, thanks for that. Oops !, I just noticed that I did the md5 checking on the wrong dll !! The one posted above is from my system (installed from another source) and not the one i'm having problems with. When compared, the md5's differ between the two. So what i'll do is simply copy that compressed...
- Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:44 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
Ok, thanks for the info. No I haven't patched that file to disable file protection, maybe it's just corrupt ? Could someone gimme a md5 hash of a known, un-patched copy of this dll please. Here's mine: sfc_os.dll 5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158) 140.288 bytes md5: 9858CC4D73A4CCF2F852FAE07C1...
- Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:01 am
- Forum: Switchless Installer Discussion
- Topic: New security update for .NET Framework v2.0 (KB917283)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3259
I'm wondering, In this MS article they state that this update can be integrated. /integrate:path Integrates the update into the Windows source files. These files are located at the path that is specified in the switch. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-033.mspx (You have to exp...
- Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:48 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
Setuperr.log looks like this: Error: Setup failed to enumerate all component packages. Software which depends on this package may not function properly. Contact your system administrator. *** Error: Setup detected that the system file named [c:\windows\system32\sfc_os.dll] is not signed properly by ...
- Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:34 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
- Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:00 am
- Forum: Update Pack Discussion
- Topic: Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2051
Setuperr.log, should I be worried ?
Hi ! I just applied Ryan's pack 2.10 and WMP 2.7 to an XP pro install. After install (Testing in VMware), I looked thru the "setuperr.log" and it says the following: Setup detected that the system file named:[C:/windows/system32/sfc_os.dll] is not signed properly by Microsoft. Use the SFC utility to...
- Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:44 pm
- Forum: Switchless Installer Discussion
- Topic: New security update for .NET Framework v2.0 (KB917283)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3259