RyanVM.net Discussion Board

ok, I see. My cat IS from M$, only that it may not comes from enu branch. But in fact all updates in different languages share same file here, it's because the cat files signs update.inf so they differ. BTW, does autopatcher stop asking you for it after you have replaced the cat file? I 'm not sure...

updated. @adric it's not kb968816.cat that causes this issue. I think it's because of AutoPatcher's update checking method. Try Windows Update for a precise check. @yumeyao From what I have been able to determine, one of the checks Autopatcher uses, is to see if the .cat files for that fix both hav...

When installing XP with integrated SP3 QFE Update Pack (user_hidden) and checking the system with Autopatcher, Iit indicates that KB968816 is installed . When I install the updatepack including your wmp11 addon , Autopatcher indicates KB968816 is not installed. Any idea why this is so? edit:: I also...

@user_hidden I downloaded the WindowsXP-KB955069-x86-ENU.exe from Msoft and compared the CAT and DLL file with what you have in your updatepack. The cat files are the same but the msxml3.dll is different from the one i got from Msoft. They both show the same version number, but the files sizes and d...

Ok, I did a clean SP3 install using only the QFE_UpdatePack. I am not seeing a WFP pop-up during the installation as previously, but the setuperr.log still shows the following entry: Error: Setup detected that the system file named [c:\windows\system32\msxml3.dll] is not signed properly by Microsoft...

After installing installing XP SP3 with the following update pack XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack_1.1.0_20090908.7z integrated with RVMi 1.6.1b21, I receive the following error message during the last part of Windows setup: Windows File Protection: Files that are required for windows to run properly have been ...

I believe this fix wil also work for your problem: http://www.qooy.com/files/S8WDWRZW/OnePiece_IE8_WinXPSP3_v2009_Repair_for_USB_XP_Setup_Installation_AddOn_INTL.7z Integrate it after you integrated IE8! How do you integrate something after the target has been integrated without RVMi wanting to del...

I too am having problems with this addon. I noticed that this addon causes duplicate entries in the txtsetup.sif. Some examples are ie4uinit.mui, ieframe.mui, sqmapi.dll, etc. This is normally not a problem if installing from a CD, but it becomes a problem when installing from a hard drive. During t...

It depends on the updates you wish to remove, adric. The update pack is not intended to be easily modified, but taken as a whole. Okay, fair enough. I guess I'll give xable 's pack a try and see if that will suffice for me. I just did not want some of the optional updates offered by WU that are inc...

Hi, Can someone tell me what I need to do in order to cleanly exclude a few KBxxxxxx updates that are included in this update pack? I will be using RVMI to do the integration. Thanks, Al Considering the silence to my question, is it correct to assume that one cannot change the QFE update pack to ex...

Hi,

Can someone tell me what I need to do in order to cleanly exclude a few KBxxxxxx updates that are included in this update pack?

I will be using RVMI to do the integration.

Thanks, Al

Hi, Can someone tell me what I need to do in order to cleanly exclude a few KBxxxxxx updates that are included in this pack? I will be using RVMI to do the integration. Thanks, Al Sorry. but this ended up in the wrong topic. It should have been in http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7184&sta...

@ENU-user
Thanks for taking the time to answer me . You are absolutely right about pointing me to Pyron's Method2 link. I totally forgot to look there. I spent a lot of time looking in the wrong places and kept coming back here.

Al

okay I'm getting closer to understanding. I still haven't figured out what triggers the fake setup to run?

I see the presetup.cmd in /I386 that .unzips the drivers, but how does presetup.cmd get started before the real setup?

Al

Okay, one last try at understanding how your addon is supposed to work. When/How is the newly created DP_MyDri.7z file processed so that the drivers later get installed?. Do I need another addon to get the files in DP_MyDri.7z integrated?? Sorry for being such a pain . I will leave you alone now. Al

Where can I find more info on how the OEM directory gets processed?. Also what is the differnce between a $oem$ and a plain oem directory? You lost me on your answer :? I only ran your addon without anything else to see what the results would be, I did not use the RS addons for this test run of RVM ...

Thanks ENU_user. I ran those two addons through RVMI and the output looks promising. Now all I have to do is burn an image and try it out. Also, I tried your addon with the Beta and I can't figure out where the additional drivers created in DP_MyDrivers_wnt5_x86-32.7z ended up on the final integrati...

Hmmm, Seems like what I am looking for is a way to get additional drivers on a windows XP install CD so there will be support for the newer ACHI controllers during installation. Nlite looks like it would be the easiest, but I don't have .NET installed and don't want to add it to my laptop. DriverPac...

.. updated! Sorry to be so dense, but are there any simple instructions on how this is supposed to be used ? After unziping the file, I see: bin MyDrivers OEM Entries_M2MyDrivers.ini presetup.cmd setupAck.ex_ If I run drivegrabber from within OEM, it does its thing and puts what it finds in the dri...

if the HD isnt formated try getting the installed drivers using siginets driver grabber or some other tool to get the current drivers found on the laptop.. and the sata ones in case the specific drivers are found you can then integrated the addon i made for integrating drivers and get them into OEM...

boooggy wrote:i thought a lot and i decided to remove addons as long as the wmp 11 slipstreamer is doing the job so well.

For those of us that do not want .NET on their system, is the last wmp11 addon version still available for download somewhere?

Al

MrNxDmX wrote: Edit: Addons are compatible with integrator 1.4.3.
As 1.5 is not final yet, i havent changed the addon structure yet.

Project51 indicated no problems with the Addon using RVM 1.5.1. What will the consequences be if we use the Addon with the RVM 1.5 Final?

Al

My guess would be that you need to define another check box since regpath can only be one or the other. I can't really say for sure though.

Al

MrNxDmX wrote:OffTopic:
hey adric, what does "Al" means? I always see it in ur posts.

Al is a nickname and comes from the name Alfred.

Al

Who's worried. MS decided to remove the check box and PsiMoon314 came up with a replacement solution.

Al ( I don't even use IE ) Adric

OK, I see what the problem is. There are two possible registry entries that can be changed depending on your setup - ClassicStartMenu or NewStartPanel. Ticking the Show IE box in the folder options only changes NewStartPanel from 1 to 0. I am using Windows classic and that value needs to be changed ...

Hi, Doesn''t work for me. I see the new check box in the folder options, but that's about all.. I do have the update that removed the IE entry from the desktop settings . Did you try ticking and unticking the option to see what happens? Generally a refresh of the desktop might make the icon show up...

Hi, I came up with the following registry work-around which adds an option to enable and disable the Internet Explorer Desktop Icon via: Control Panel -> Folder Options -> View Tab. The first part of the .REG file below adds an option "Show Internet Explorer icon on the desktop" as a Tick option: W...

HI, I recently ran the integrator with the latest update pack and everything completed without errors. When I ran the install from CD, it complained about various drivers missing. I checked the driver.cab that was created and it was only 4.5MB although it should have been around 76MB. The smaller dr...