RyanVM Update Pack 2.1.3 - Released October 14, 2006

darkradx · Post by **darkradx** » Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:54 pm

KB888111(HDA/UAA bus driver) doesn't work. The windows says it is NOT WHQL verified.[/img]

RickSteele · Post by **RickSteele** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:18 am

Hi RyanVM,

Would you be interested in incorporating Wireless Client Update for Windows XP with Service Pack 2-KB917021 in your next update pack?

Post by **RyanVM** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:16 am

No, it's already superseded by another fix in the pack.

darkradx · Post by **darkradx** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:46 am

hdaudres.dll in 2.1.3 is bad(The installation will stop for no windows logo).
the right one MD5SUM should be:

25fa7a6a8e081eac69cabfd13297a5d0 *hdaudres.dll

The solution was tested working.

coukou · Post by **coukou** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:33 pm

Hi Ryan,

I do have also problem with HDA hotfix.

In fact, i'm integrating the latest bashrats driver packs when DriverPack Sound A 6.08.1 start to be inegrated i have "English (RyanVM's) UpdatePack detected: no HDA hotfix will be slipstreamed." message.

Here my Driver problem and solution (manually) after UA installation.
Read closely my remarks inside the images here bellow

Regards
coukou

Post by **RyanVM** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:00 pm

Guys, I'll look into the HDA issues. It's weird, because I have some beta testers (including myself on my laptop) with HDA and we didn't run into any issues during 2.1.3 testing.

RickSteele · Post by **RickSteele** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:03 pm

RyanVM wrote:No, it's already superseded by another fix in the pack.

OK, Thanks

mazin · Post by **mazin** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:37 pm

Just wanted to say THANK YOU!

What about this update: WindowsXP-KB875506-v2-x86-ENU

TOPIC.

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:27 pm

New optional update:

KB920342 - An update is available to upgrade PNRP to PNRP version 2.0 for computers that are running Microsoft Windows XP

Post by **RyanVM** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:05 pm

This isn't the thread for those types of announcements...

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:17 am

You closed the hotfix hunt thread, so I figured this section is as well the section for things that will go into 2.1.4?

Post by **RyanVM** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:22 am

I closed that thread because it's irrelevant these days, as in those types of announcements aren't really needed at all

. But if it makes you feel important, you can start a new thread in General Discussion for announcing new fixes.

As the title of this thread says, it's for discussing 2.1.3.

coukou · Post by **coukou** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:56 am

RyanVM wrote:Guys, I'll look into the HDA issues. It's weird, because I have some beta testers (including myself on my laptop) with HDA and we didn't run into any issues during 2.1.3 testing.

Any news for the HDA issues???

Regards
coukou

Post by **RyanVM** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:18 pm

I'm literally home & awake for literally 2-3 hours a day right now, so looking into that has been way at the bottom of the list of things to do.

avneet25 · Post by **avneet25** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:30 am

i have downloaded twice and am getting crc error wheni test with winrar

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:21 am

Check if the MD5 sum is correct. What do you need WinRAR for??

MrNxDmX · Post by **MrNxDmX** » Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:47 am

avneet25 wrote:i have downloaded twice and am getting crc error wheni test with winrar

So, its a corrupt download. Check md5, probably it will be false...

RogueSpear · Post by **RogueSpear** » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:24 am

I just went through a day and a half rebuilding a hard drive. This one was so hard to find, but I bet it happens to someone else at some point.

On my work computer I have a second hard disk for data and that's where I keep all of my stuff for making installs. After spending several hours trying to figure out why I couldn't make an install that wasn't corrupt I decided to check out the MD5s on all of my downloads. They all came out OK. For the hell of it I decided to test all of them with WinRAR's test archive function. Ryan's Update Pack failed. Ok, no problem. I tested the Update Pack archive on my laptop and it was fine so I copied it over to my desktop. WinRAR test archive -> corrupt. MD5 -> match.

I then let SpinRite spend 49 hours doing the level 5 scan on the drive and it found a few dozen bad sectors, marked them as bad, etc. So the moral of the story is that somehow or another - I didn't think this was even possible - your archive file may pass MD5 checking, but a defective hard disk can hide some problems from you.

orcoxp · Post by **orcoxp** » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:25 am

Hold CTRL when clicking to DL it...this will bypass any proxy servers and get a fresh copy...it's also possible that you have packet loss and it's halting the download.

codejunkie · Post by **codejunkie** » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:10 pm

what's happened to the tracker? I cant get on the page

its working now...nevermind

Post by **RyanVM** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:39 am

I don't know what's up with the tracker lately. I'm working on it.

Kishiro · Post by **Kishiro** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:50 pm

@RyanVM

I think darkradx is right (see post further up). The file "hdaudres.dll" in the 2.1.3 package IS corrupt. The file must have been bad before you made the checksum, because my download of the RVM 2.1.3 package is kosher according to the md5. But if I download the KB888111 and extract the "hdaudres.dll" and then do a contents-compare between this file and the one in your package, I get a difference on line 0110 (in hex).

Here's the RVM 2.1.3 "hdaudres.dll" (Build 5.10.01.5013):
0110: 64 86 00 00 02 00 00 04

Here's the KB888111 "hdaudres.dll" (Build 5.10.01.5013):
0110: 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 04

MrNxDmX · Post by **MrNxDmX** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:57 pm

@ Kishiro: Thanks for the headsup. I am sure Ryan solved this problem, as he knows this from both darkradx and coukou's posts.

RyanVM wrote:Guys, I'll look into the HDA issues. It's weird, because I have some beta testers (including myself on my laptop) with HDA and we didn't run into any issues during 2.1.3 testing.

Post by **RyanVM** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:37 pm

Have you guys confirmed that replacing the file in i386 with the "uncorrupted" version fixes the problem?

darkradx · Post by **darkradx** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 12:58 am

Yes, I have tested that before my previous post

Post by **RyanVM** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:57 am

Great, thanks for confirming.

Zacam · Post by **Zacam** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:54 am

Note on MD5 and it's corruptability: SHA1 values should stay the same for a good file as that will change if the file is written to bad sectors, unlike the MD5 issue RogueSpear noticed.

buletov · Post by **buletov** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:11 am

So what will be the fix for this?

0utlaw · Post by **0utlaw** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:33 am

Hey RyanVM, your update packs are THE best.
When do you think you will release the next version, i.e. v2.1.4?
My windows is a messed up and I'm holding out from reinstalling until the new pack is released.

Thanx!

MrNxDmX · Post by **MrNxDmX** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:43 am

@ 0utlaw: Frequently Asked Questions
Second one on that page.

Post by **RyanVM** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:53 am

buletov wrote:So what will be the fix for this?

I dunno. The SHA1 hash on hdaudres.dll is the same for me whether it's from the pack or extracted from KB888111. Combine that with the fact that it seems only a few people are experiencing it, and I really don't know what's going on.

RogueSpear · Post by **RogueSpear** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:20 am

I've been successfully using the latest Update Pack on units with Sigmatel HDA chips and it's been working fine. Now I also use the DriverPacks and from what I can see the driver set does not contain it's own hda files, but relies on them being there already.

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:55 pm

removed

WhoWeAre · Post by **WhoWeAre** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:14 am

When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

TechnoHunter · Post by **TechnoHunter** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:13 am

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

not to answer out of turn, but who the hell do you think you are?

if i was Ryan YOUR post would have the glaring effect of making SURE that the pack was not released any time soon.. be very glad that i am NOT ryan..

i dont have his patience, or most likely his dedication...

in conclusion.. grow up.. as the faq states the pack will be done when it is done.. till then DONT ASK

TechnoHunter

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:53 am

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

Too bad I don't have the power to give you a really long break from visiting this site!

mr_smartepants · Post by **mr_smartepants** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:17 am

TechnoHunter wrote: in conclusion.. grow up.. as the faq states the pack will be done when it is done.. till then DONT ASK

Well spoken. I couldn't have said it better myself.

I'm sure it won't be long before Ryan notices this and takes the appropriate action.

Post by **RyanVM** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:20 pm

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

How about the same time you decide to post something worthwhile?

I'll tell you what, take a week to learn some manners and then come back.

Mavericks choice · Post by **Mavericks choice** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:02 pm

Yay Ryan, are people lazy or what, if they can eagerly watch this space they can surely add a few patches to an existing update pack.

Cheers

MC.

Aussie · Post by **Aussie** » Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:35 am

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

One thing you can count on ryan......the more members your site attracts.........the larger the pool of "assholes" within!

xzourska · Post by **xzourska** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

For that I feel that "WhoWeAre" should be banned and be prevented from downloading anything from RyanVM since Ryan has so much going on and puts so much work into these update packs anyone who doesn’t treat him with respect should not deserve to live! I am very happy that he goes out of his way to make these update packs and he has helped me sooo much that I can’t even think of how to repay him.

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:51 pm

You can start with donating $1000.

mr_smartepants · Post by **mr_smartepants** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:15 pm

ViVa wrote:You can start with donating $1000.

Or less...

Ryan has a 'tip jar' link on his main page.
Just click the PayPal logo at the bottom of this page.
Be as generous as your conscience tells you.

Ryan, I promised you a beer. Use the $$ I dropped in your tip jar to tide you over until I can get back to Philly (maybe this year).

Firefrorefiddle · Post by **Firefrorefiddle** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:15 pm

WhoWeAre wrote:When do you plan on releasing 2.1.4, jackass?

honestly, how should he even be able to release the a new pack if the november updates only went live today, honestly. do some research before you write out of turn.

ophiel · Post by **ophiel** » Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:26 pm

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JUSQSGN5

cab compressed authentic hdaudres.dll (from kb888111) to replace the corrupt version in 2.1.3

after applying 2.1.3 to your cd, overwrite the file in i386 with this one.

newsposter · Post by **newsposter** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:31 am

methinks that someone is looking to get themselves banned..........

Post by **RyanVM** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:28 pm

ophiel wrote:http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JUSQSGN5

cab compressed authentic hdaudres.dll (from kb888111) to replace the corrupt version in 2.1.3

after applying 2.1.3 to your cd, overwrite the file in i386 with this one.

It's weird. My local extracted copy of KB888111 has a different SHA1 hash for hdaudres.dll than the one you posted, so I redownloaded the hotfix and sure enough, that one has the same hash as yours. Don't know how mine got corrupted, but I'm glad you noticed. Thanks for your help

Nightwolf81 · Post by **Nightwolf81** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:55 pm

I noticed the whole Jackass fiasco. . . But now overdue 2 days from every other month I am getting a little twitchy myself woundering when oh when. . . BUT I WONT ASK. . . I never want a break from RyanVM forums. . My IE7 is opened to this forum all day and night with me pressing refresh!

let's just say looking foward to the next few packs you release (including IE7, MP11, DOT.NET fx 3) BUT formost your Main Pack has priority as no one elses compares to the stability of yours.

thatsanuffsaidexcept Thanks!

Firefrorefiddle · Post by **Firefrorefiddle** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:07 pm

well, i'll add my few cents too. ryan, could we maybe get an estimated eta on the next pack?
for some sad sad reason, i get excited about new updates..lol..oh well.
anyway, it'd be appreciated so i can start crawling the net for all the other updates for my install build.
thanks tons for your work

ViVa · Post by **ViVa** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:29 pm

Guys, if we look into the past we see that Ryan almost always releases a new pack within 1-7 days after Microsoft's patch Tuesday. Right now we are 3-4 days further, so what would be your guess on an ETA? Right. Be patient, it's coming.

RyanVM.net Discussion Board

RyanVM Update Pack 2.1.3 - Released October 14, 2006

Thank you RyanVM

HDA fix for 2.1.3

Re: HDA fix for 2.1.3