[Discontinued] WU Zero Update Pack

Windows XP Professional Update Pack discussion.
Locked
User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

[Discontinued] WU Zero Update Pack

Post by boooggy » Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:18 am

project stoped.
Last edited by boooggy on Sat May 12, 2007 4:12 pm, edited 56 times in total.

fluid
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 4:46 am

Post by fluid » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:37 am

Can I integrate this on top of Ryan's Pack?

User avatar
glent
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: UK

Re: [Release]Update Pack 1.0 (WU only)

Post by glent » Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:11 am

boooggy wrote:here is an update pack which contains the updates found on WU till today:
size 31.9mb
hash: EB7D72B803A5F04BE1B7233D1594D418

the list of updates:

Code: Select all

KB319740, KB873339, KB884883, KB885250, KB885835
KB885836, KB886185, KB887472, KB887606, KB887742
KB887797, KB888113, KB888302, KB890046, KB890859
KB891781, KB893066, KB893756, KB893803, KB894391
KB896344, KB896358, KB896422, KB896423, KB896424
KB896428, KB898461, KB899587, KB899589, KB899591
KB900725, KB900930, KB901017, KB901214, KB902400
KB904706, KB905414, KB905749, KB908519, KB909520
KB910437, KB912919
also contains MRT, highmat, original WGA, Microsoft Update, Hashtab, Unlocker 1.7.7, makecab, cabarc, modifype and modded explorer.exe, shell32.dll, msgina.dll.
what mods are made to explorer etc , screenshot?

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:45 am

@fluid
i think u can but i recommand integration on a fresh source.
@glent
msgina.dll modded with xpize
explorer.exe and shell32.dll modded with vista transformation pack 3 and xpize
screenshot:
Image
Last edited by boooggy on Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Xable
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:38 pm
Contact:

Post by Xable » Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:11 pm

Damn you boooggy you beat me to it :twisted: But mine is gonna be just critical fixes and nothing else :D
Last edited by Xable on Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Siginet
Site Admin
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Post by Siginet » Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:13 pm

@Booggy... the file needs to be renamed to Boooggy_UpdatePack.cab or the integrator will not see it as an UpdatePack. You have it named Boooggy_Update_Pack.cab right now.

Edit:
I also found a few files that are not 8.3 compliant.
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - GWFSPidGen.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - HighMATCD.chm
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - LegitCheckControl.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerCOM.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerDriver4.sys

Not a big deal for most users... but the files are not following the 8.3 rule of thumb. ;)
Image
--Siginet--

Techware
Your Virtual Technician
Computer Management Software

techtype
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:46 pm

Post by techtype » Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:29 pm

Xable wrote:Damn you boooggy you beat me to it :twisted: But mine is gonna be just critical fixes and nothing else :D
Exactly what is needed for many of us!!!

larciel
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:14 am

Post by larciel » Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:47 pm

i love how you modded shell32.dll with both xpize and vista transform pack. could you tell me how u did it? (and other files as well? thanks)

avneet25
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:25 am
Location: Fiji Islands
Contact:

Post by avneet25 » Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:48 pm

how about loosing that codename longhorn stuff from start menu.. dont really like that.. wud be great if u could change that

User avatar
Siginet
Site Admin
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Post by Siginet » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:15 pm

avneet25 wrote:how about loosing that codename longhorn stuff from start menu.. dont really like that.. wud be great if u could change that
I agree.
Image
--Siginet--

Techware
Your Virtual Technician
Computer Management Software

User avatar
RyanVM
Site Admin
Posts: 5187
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by RyanVM » Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:09 pm

Nice to see that someone has taken up this pack. I'm surprised it's taken this long :). I'd recommend you leave the WU-only pack "vanilla", though. It seems kind of contradictory that you include only official hotfixes but then also hack files. Why not make those extra files a seperate addon?

User avatar
dgelwin
Posts: 1152
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:33 am
Location: Tegucigalpa, Honduras

Post by dgelwin » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:42 am

yes i agree with ryan, im glad there is only a wu pack, but the fact that you mode the files in the pack kinda doesnt work for me, dont mean to sound ungratefull but maybe you can create a clean pack, then create an addon with the modded files like what ryan did with sfc, and uxtheme this way the user has a choice of preference. but good job nonetheless very good in fact.
Don't sweat petty things....or pet sweaty things

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:13 am

ok redone it and now is only with WU updates.
also now compatible with 8.3 standards.

Pascal
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:51 am

Post by Pascal » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:05 pm

huh, where is the link? i can't find it anywhere?

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:08 pm

i am thinking to add the wmp 10 to this pack .... so what do u guys think?
Pascal wrote:huh, where is the link? i can't find it anywhere?
:shock: :!:

Pascal
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:51 am

Post by Pascal » Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:53 pm

boooggy wrote:i am thinking to add the wmp 10 to this pack .... so what do u guys think?
i'm with eveybody plain vanilla and then separate addons pack

User avatar
Mavericks choice
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:39 am
Location: Downunder

Post by Mavericks choice » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:40 am

Pascal wrote:
boooggy wrote:i am thinking to add the wmp 10 to this pack .... so what do u guys think?
i'm with eveybody plain vanilla and then separate addons pack
Me too.

Cheers

MC.
The Man from Aus

fluid
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 4:46 am

Post by fluid » Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:01 am

Same here. Vanilla and addon packs are more flexible. :D

john2003
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:39 am

Post by john2003 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:19 am

I would like to see an update pack and only one that will show zero updates needed when you visit windows update. So yes please add wmp 10. Thanks for all your effort.

ViVa

Post by ViVa » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:22 am

@john2003, so you need WMC2, HighMAT, Cryptographic Media Card etc etc as well... Just stick to critical updates and leave the optional updates as addons.

john2003
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:39 am

Post by john2003 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:34 am

Viva, I just like to satisfy windows update with a big 0 and it would be nice to have everything in one pack or make 2 packs one for critical and one for recommended updates. Just my thought. The more private fixes in the packs the slower the install seems to go.

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:42 pm

ok thanx for the answers.
i made also a pack that contains ALL updates on WU including Windows Media Player 10 and Windows Media Connect 2. so on WU appear only the .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.
check the first post.....

john2003
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:39 am

Post by john2003 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:50 pm

Booogy, Awesome......this hit's everything except for dotnet framework 1.1 and 2.0 right? Going to test tonight for sure. Is your wmp 10 vanilla ? Or altered icon. Great work!!!

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:28 pm

like i said it does not have donet 1.1 and 2.
also wmp 10 is NOT my modded one. is a wmp 10 plain but with all hotfixes for it:
KB888656, KB895181, KB895316, KB896097, KB900399, KB902344
KB904415, kb905592, KB907658, KB910393, KB911854

john2003
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:39 am

Post by john2003 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:34 pm

Great!!! Exactly what I was looking for....Thanks Booogy

User avatar
dgelwin
Posts: 1152
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:33 am
Location: Tegucigalpa, Honduras

Post by dgelwin » Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:09 pm

ii have a quick question can i integrate your wmp 10 moded addon over this addon?
Don't sweat petty things....or pet sweaty things

dumpper
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:04 pm

Post by dumpper » Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:11 pm

Hi boooggy:

Many thanks for your great works ! I also think that you should state CLEARLY at the beginning that your package is an **alternative** to Ryan's 2.01 Post SP2 pack so that many users would be less confused with just some "add-ons" and stuffs ...

D.

dumpper
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:04 pm

Post by dumpper » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:09 pm

Besides, for comparison, I found that Ryan's 2.01 + Siginet's Addon v1.5 produce 95 "KB*.*" files in the \i386\svcpack folder, while Boooggy's WUZero_UpdatePack.cab (posted Jan 13th) produces only 51 "KB*.*" files when integrating with a clean SP2.

Also, Boooggy's pack contains some KB updates that are NOT found in the Ryan 2.01 + Siginet 1.5 packages, and vice versa !!!??!! (ie. 885250, 886185 ...)

Hmm, this really confuses me ... :?

User avatar
Mavericks choice
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:39 am
Location: Downunder

Post by Mavericks choice » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:42 pm

dumpper wrote:Besides, for comparison, I found that Ryan's 2.01 + Siginet's Addon v1.5 produce 95 "KB*.*" files in the \i386\svcpack folder, while Boooggy's WUZero_UpdatePack.cab (posted Jan 13th) produces only 51 "KB*.*" files when integrating with a clean SP2.

Also, Boooggy's pack contains some KB updates that are NOT found in the Ryan 2.01 + Siginet 1.5 packages, and vice versa !!!??!! (ie. 885250, 886185 ...)

Hmm, this really confuses me ... :?
Just ran the critical pack only on a workstation here & appears to be all good. Checked wu & no high priority patches req'd.

Cheers

MC
The Man from Aus

User avatar
cyberloner
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:13 am
Location: http://www.cybermania.ws
Contact:

Post by cyberloner » Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:05 am

dgelwin wrote:ii have a quick question can i integrate your wmp 10 moded addon over this addon?
Tested by me and it works like champs

Thanks Booogy

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:55 pm

updated wuzero pack...

Saito
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:46 am

Post by Saito » Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:09 am

hi Im new to this forum, but I have alredy done an XP cd with some goodies integrated using nLite and Powerpacker(thanks Siginet).

Anyway, does the bigger pack include the explorer mods mentioned earlier? Looks like it doesnt.

why not include Flash/Shockwave player to make it a full alternative to Ryan's?

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:25 am

my 2 packs here contain flash player ....

Saito
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:46 am

Post by Saito » Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:01 pm

oh yeah I checked again after the post and noticed that, but are the explorer mods still there?

I think I saw a shell32.dll but what about the others?

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:31 am

no, nothing modded in both packs.

techtype
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:46 pm

Post by techtype » Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:37 am

You've got these packs perfected now! I tried the larger one and it's ideal for conservative, professional users.

Thanks very much for this work!! :D :D :D

Saito
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:46 am

Post by Saito » Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:25 pm

aww too bad.

you should include a modded one. That screenshot looked good.

Anyway thanks for the info.

john2003
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:39 am

Post by john2003 » Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:30 am

boooggy,

finally tested !!! and hats off to you for this pack works flawlessly with all updates installed and zero on ms updates except .net framework. Hopefully somebody is working on that 1.1/2.0 .net multipack as that is the buzz around the forum. Great Job.

a06
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a06 » Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:00 pm

ok, i finally got around to reading this topic (!!)...

I'm confused. I see that it's an alternative to Ryan's pack, but what is the difference?
Is the method of integration the same? Are the updates the same?
Basically, I'm wondering why you went through the trouble of making another pack - what is the diff between this and Ryan's?

User avatar
boooggy
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by boooggy » Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:06 pm

the first one contains all updates that are found on Windows Update except windows media player 10 and windows media connect 2.
the second one contains all WU updates and wmp 10 and wmc2. so if u use this one when u getting on WU u will find only the 2 .net framework.
the difference compare to Ryan's is that my packs contain ONLY WU updates.

a06
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a06 » Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:22 pm

boooggy wrote:the difference compare to Ryan's is that my packs contain ONLY WU updates.
So you have only WU updates, and Ryan has WU updates + a few others?

Also, is the method of integration the same?

User avatar
Siginet
Site Admin
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Post by Siginet » Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:07 pm

yes
Image
--Siginet--

Techware
Your Virtual Technician
Computer Management Software

a06
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a06 » Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:19 pm

any way to test that all updates have been successfully installed from the WUZero_UpdatePack.cab ? (besides going to WU)

[edit]
I ran QFECHECK, and got some errors:
KB909520: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB887797: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB893066: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB900725: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB905915: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB909520: Software update for Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider
KB887797: Outlook Express for Windows update
KB893066: Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP could allow remote code execution and denial of service
KB900725: Vulnerabilities in the Windows shell could allow for remote code execution
KB905915: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer - December 2005

Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I'm using
Tcpip.sys (100 Connections): RVMAddonsTCPIP_1.0.cab
UXTheme.dll: RVMAddonsUXTheme_1.0.cab

Why aren't these hotfixes correctly installed?
Last edited by a06 on Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:54 am, edited 2 times in total.

NemoNada
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:32 am

Post by NemoNada » Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:05 pm

Thanks booogy!

As always, excellent work!
Take care,

Jim

"Guam: Where America's Day Begins!"

User avatar
RyanVM
Site Admin
Posts: 5187
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by RyanVM » Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:55 pm

a06 wrote:any way to test that all updates have been successfully installed from the WUZero_UpdatePack.cab ? (besides going to WU)

[edit]
I ran QFECHECK, and got some errors:
KB909520: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB887797: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB893066: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB900725: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB905915: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB909520: Software update for Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider
KB887797: Outlook Express for Windows update
KB893066: Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP could allow remote code execution and denial of service
KB900725: Vulnerabilities in the Windows shell could allow for remote code execution
KB905915: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer - December 2005

Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I'm using
Tcpip.sys (100 Connections): RVMAddonsTCPIP_1.0.cab
UXTheme.dll: RVMAddonsUXTheme_1.0.cab

Why aren't these hotfixes correctly installed?
You know, you could actually look at the KB articles to see what files are hotfixed :rolleyes:

a06
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a06 » Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:51 pm

RyanVM wrote:You know, you could actually look at the KB articles to see what files are hotfixed :rolleyes:
I tried that, but that doesn't really help me figure out why qfecheck says these hotfixes are incorrectly installed.
I'm sure someone like yourself understands what all this means a lot better than I do - that's why I'm asking.

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4619
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:04 pm

If the CATs aren't included they won't show as correctly installed, but they'll still work. :)

Check your svcpack directory within I386 to see if they exist.

Xable
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:38 pm
Contact:

Post by Xable » Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:00 pm

qfecheck -v
will give you more info.

techtype
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:46 pm

Post by techtype » Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:53 pm

Xable wrote:qfecheck -v
will give you more info.
Here is the output for that command:

Code: Select all


Windows XP Hotfix Validation Report for \\XPTEST

Report Date: 1/29/2006  8:50pm



Current Service Pack Level:  Service Pack 2



Hotfixes Identified:

KB909520:  This hotfix should be reinstalled.



	The following files are incorrect for this hotfix:

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\BASECSP.DLL



Q282784:  Current on system.

KB873339:  Current on system.

KB885250:  Current on system.

KB885835:  Current on system.

KB885836:  Current on system.

KB885884:  Current on system.

KB886185:  Current on system.

KB887472:  Current on system.

KB887742:  Current on system.

KB887797:  This hotfix should be reinstalled.



	The following files are incorrect for this hotfix:

		C:\PROGRAM FILES\COMMON FILES\SYSTEM\WAB32.DLL

		C:\PROGRAM FILES\OUTLOOK EXPRESS\WABIMP.DLL



KB888113:  Current on system.

KB888302:  Current on system.

KB890046:  Current on system.

KB890859:  Current on system.

KB891781:  Current on system.

KB893066:  Current on system.

KB893357:  Current on system.

KB893756:  Current on system.

KB893803:  Current on system.

KB894391:  Current on system.

KB896256:  Current on system.

KB896344:  Current on system.

KB896358:  Current on system.

KB896422:  Current on system.

KB896423:  Current on system.

KB896424:  Current on system.

KB896428:  Current on system.

KB898461:  Current on system.

KB899587:  Current on system.

KB899589:  Current on system.

KB899591:  Current on system.

KB900725:  This hotfix should be reinstalled.



	The following files are not valid in the system catalog:

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHLWAPI.DLL



KB900930:  Current on system.

KB901017:  Current on system.

KB901214:  Current on system.

KB902400:  Current on system.

KB904706:  Current on system.

KB905414:  Current on system.

KB905749:  Current on system.

KB905915:  This hotfix should be reinstalled.



	The following files are not valid in the system catalog:

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\WININET.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\URLMON.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\IEPEERS.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DXTRANS.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DANIM.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CDFVIEW.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\BROWSEUI.DLL

		C:\PROGRAM FILES\INTERNET EXPLORER\IEDW.EXE

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\EXTMGR.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHLWAPI.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHDOCVW.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\PNGFILT.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSTIME.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSRATING.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSHTMLED.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSHTML.DLL

		C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\INSENG.DLL



KB908519:  Current on system.

KB910437:  Current on system.

KB912919:  Current on system.

Edit: Running the same command on Pure RyanVM shows all hotfixes installed correctly except kb319740 --- which is caused by my patched uxtheme.dll. So actually, Ryans is --- most perfect.

a06
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a06 » Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:39 pm

techtype wrote:Running the same command on Pure RyanVM shows all hotfixes installed correctly except kb319740 --- which is caused by my patched uxtheme.dll. So actually, Ryans is --- most perfect.
Hmm. That is unfortunate.
Boooggy, do you think you could fix this?

Locked