[Updated] XP SP3 Update Pack 02.10-01

Windows XP Professional Update Pack discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:41 pm

Thanks for the unbelievably quick update, Red! Is there a reason you didn't include KB967715? It appears to be a High Priority update.

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:59 pm

vioplujjnsjzfg wrote:KB967715
It's just a re-release of a security update from last year. I have no idea why they re-released an old security update as a non-security update, but it's very much outdated.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:19 pm

This registry key seems to be the only thing new in the package:

Code: Select all

HKLM,"Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer","HonorAutoRunSetting",0x10001,1

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:43 pm

It's not new, it's from KB950582. I see no difference between KB967715 and KB950582, if you already have KB950582 then you probably weren't offered KB967715.

KB955074 already contained a newer GDR shell32.dll than both, the registry changes from KB950582 except "HonorAutoRunSetting". So I just put "HonorAutoRunSetting" into KB955074 section and deleted KB950582.

User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:55 pm

redxii wrote:It's not new, it's from KB950582. I see no difference between KB967715 and KB950582, if you already have KB950582 then you probably weren't offered KB967715.

KB955074 already contained a newer GDR shell32.dll than both, the registry changes from KB950582 except "HonorAutoRunSetting". So I just put "HonorAutoRunSetting" into KB955074 section and deleted KB950582.
As usual, I spoke a bit too soon. The main reason I even brought it up was because I saw it in xable's pack.

I am, however, being offered 961118 even after doing a clean integration with your new pack... Any ideas why?

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:50 pm

If you're installing .NET 3.5 SP1, vioplujjnsjzfg, then that's why. ;)

User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:14 am

5eraph wrote:If you're installing .NET 3.5 SP1, vioplujjnsjzfg, then that's why. ;)
I guess I have to think things through a bit further before I post. :? Of course you're right, 5eraph. Since red was including it in the update pack (I noticed it's been removed since) I never thought to dig any deeper to find out why I was still being offered the update.

ki46ej03
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:08 am
Location: uk

Post by ki46ej03 » Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:55 am

ty for this much app.

User avatar
compstuff
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Florida

Post by compstuff » Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:10 am

THANKS Redxii... awesome work as always...

FrizzleFry
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:32 pm

Post by FrizzleFry » Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:35 pm

This security update was updated on March 10, 2009

WindowsXP-KB938464-v2-x86-ENU.exe

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/securi ... 8-052.mspx

should it be updated in the pack?

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:46 pm

No, FizzleFry.
In [i]Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update[/i], Microsoft wrote:Customers who have already successfully installed the original updates for Windows XP Service Pack 3 or Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 do not need to reinstall the new updates.

kaitsevaim
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
Location: Estonia

Post by kaitsevaim » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:17 pm

hi again! Sorry but could you look over your fontreg update. My install says at T-13 that fontreg.exe is missing. I can take a screenshot for you if u wish!? Can i add the fix myself manually maybe? :?
Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:18 pm

You're probably using another update pack in conjunction with mine. You're only supposed to use one update pack. Mine doesn't update or work with Ryan's or anyone else's. http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=87606#87606

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:29 pm

FrizzleFry wrote:This security update was updated on March 10, 2009

WindowsXP-KB938464-v2-x86-ENU.exe

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/securi ... 8-052.mspx

should it be updated in the pack?
I updated it but since it isn't important it can wait for the next release.

kaitsevaim
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
Location: Estonia

Post by kaitsevaim » Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:21 am

i did not slipstream any update packs myself beside yours. Another kind of update pack may have been slipstreamed to the original MSDN SP3 ultra 2009 iso before. Ryan´s pack may be it, but i dont know that exactly. Unfortunately Ryan doesn´t update his pack very often and i was searching kind of alternative to slipstreaming all the hotfixes one-by-one after that manually. Besides i like the optional updates that you have included. :( and i cant slipstream the MRT or update for root certificates manually. :?
Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice

User avatar
user_hidden
Posts: 1924
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
Location: Canada eh!

Post by user_hidden » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:17 am

kaitsevaim wrote:i did not slipstream any update packs myself beside yours. Another kind of update pack may have been slipstreamed to the original MSDN SP3 ultra 2009 iso before.?
looks like warez to me!

always start with a clean untouched source.

kaitsevaim
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
Location: Estonia

Post by kaitsevaim » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:52 pm

warez??? if it were, it had genuine licence code. Can you tell me why MSDN should make something like that? :rolleyes: ..carefully optimized registry entries, updated aspi, slipstreamed ati and nvidia drivers a.s.o. very strange...
Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:39 pm

There's nothing special about MSDN ISOs, an MSDN retail ISO is the same thing as what's on a retail XP CD. I know the problem isn't the update pack.

User avatar
user_hidden
Posts: 1924
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
Location: Canada eh!

Post by user_hidden » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:44 pm

kaitsevaim wrote: original MSDN SP3 ultra 2009 iso

and what is a "MSDN SP3 ultra 2009 iso" as your source ?

User avatar
user_hidden
Posts: 1924
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
Location: Canada eh!

Post by user_hidden » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:46 pm

kaitsevaim wrote:warez??? if it were, it had genuine licence code. Can you tell me why MSDN should make something like that? :rolleyes: ..carefully optimized registry entries, updated aspi, slipstreamed ati and nvidia drivers a.s.o. very strange...
interesting never heard of a slipstreamed, optimized, driver packed MSDN version ! would be interested in the SHA1 hash of your image.

below are the true MSDN/TEchnet released versions of WindowsXP SP3 (english)

retail - windows xp professional with service pack 3 (x86) - cd (english)
en_windows_xp_professional_with_service_pack_3_x86_cd_x14-80428.iso
size=589.14
sha1:1c735b38931bf57fb14ebd9a9ba253ceb443d459
CRC: FFFFFFFF


vlk corporate - windows xp professional with service pack 3 (x86) - cd (english)
en_windows_xp_professional_with_service_pack_3_x86_cd_vl_x14-73974.iso
size=589.14
MD5: 5BF476E2FC445B8D06B3C2A6091FE3AA
SHA-1: 66AC289AE27724C5AE17139227CBE78C01EEFE40
CRC: FFFFFFFF



in any event this is redxii thread for his update pack and it is fine.

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:07 am

user_hidden wrote:interesting never heard of a slipstreamed, optimized, driver packed MSDN version
That's because one doesn't exist. It's pretty much guaranteed that kaitsevaim is referring to some warez copy he found.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

kaitsevaim
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
Location: Estonia

Post by kaitsevaim » Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:34 am

OK! Then i have to start over with a legitimate copy. I didnt realize it could be warez.

Code: Select all

Made with the passion and skill of elite MSFN lovers out of a Genuine XP SP3 MSDN version, over which have been added all the security updates till 29 DECEMBER 2008, 
that Micro does not offer to you by classic update maneuver !!!
Yeah...its warez all right! :rolleyes:
Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice

masterm
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:31 am
Location: South Africa

Post by masterm » Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:33 pm

I see Ryan has not updated his pack yet and I need to create iso. What is the difference between this pack and the one Ryan creates.

I have searched for a similar question but could not find one

ccl0
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:56 am

Post by ccl0 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:48 pm

masterm wrote:I see Ryan has not updated his pack yet and I need to create iso. What is the difference between this pack and the one Ryan creates.

I have searched for a similar question but could not find one
your answer is in the first post of this topic

compare that to what is in ryan's. you'll notice a difference in what is or is not included

edit: this might make it easier to compare the two http://www.ryanvm.net/msfn/updatepack-sp3.html

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:35 pm

:tard: What was your first clue? That the disk didn't have a microsoft logo/hologram or that someone downloaded it for you?

Sooooo many people come in here to try and get support for their 'legimate warez' or whatever they think they have.......

wildwestgoh
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 12:59 am

Post by wildwestgoh » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:44 pm

Just a curious question regards this update pack compare to Ryan's.
1. Is there any different between this and Ryan's?
2. Why is Ryan's update bigger? (~9MB different, even it's 2 months older)
3. Could I include RVMAddons 1.9.0 as well along with this update pack?

Thanks in advance for your kind reply =)

cezarica
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:55 pm

Post by cezarica » Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:14 pm

After I've reinstalled Windows I removed the Windows Media Player (I prefer to use Media Player Classic over it) like I always do i went on Microsoft Windows Update site and it put me to install two updates. KB952069 and KB941569. The first is already in the pack, while the second isn't. It's me or KB941569 should be included in the pack?

Great work by the way. Keep it up. :)

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:07 pm

I don't see KB941569, these are all the updates I see:
Critical:
Windows Internet Explorer 7 for Windows XP

Optional:
Microsoft Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider Package: x86 (KB909520)
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) x86
Windows Search 4.0 for Windows XP (KB940157)
Windows Media Player 11
Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1
Microsoft Silverlight (KB960353)
Windows Live Essentials
If you removed stuff w/ nLite, then that's probably why.

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:38 pm

KB941569 is already partially obsoleted by SP3 (wmasf.dll) and by KB952069 (wmvcore.dll).

But still, those hotfixes showing aren't a result of me not including them, it's a result of having removed those files. I don't modify my source other than the update pack, my virtual machine doesn't install any other additional updates or new versions so it's much faster to check for new updates.

cezarica
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:55 pm

Post by cezarica » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:26 pm

The only tool I used was RVM Integrator. Got my CD updated with your update pack among some other addons to mostly remove some unwanted stuff.

Pressed a *special* key on my keyboard and it started WMP 9 while I wanted Winamp to kick in not it. Just canceled and then removed it from 'Add/Remove Windows Components'. I'll do more tests about it on a virtual box and will let you know my findings.

Thanks for your reply. :)

User avatar
alur
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by alur » Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:26 pm

Edit: never-mind :p
A sufficient amount of googling is indistinguishable from actual knowledge.

User avatar
Nic01
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:36 pm

GREEK POST SP3 UPDATE PACK?

Post by Nic01 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:37 pm

HI all,

may this not the best place to ask ,but i m wondering if there s a greek post sp3 update pack anywhere,containing wmp11 and ie8.If someone could post a link here or tell me where to look id be really greatful.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: GREEK POST SP3 UPDATE PACK?

Post by beats » Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:39 pm

Nic01 wrote:HI all,

may this not the best place to ask ,but i m wondering if there s a greek post sp3 update pack anywhere,containing wmp11 and ie8.If someone could post a link here or tell me where to look id be really greatful.
Not as far as I know, at least not on this forum.

Silverarrow
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Canada

adding packs, addons and making the final product with nLite

Post by Silverarrow » Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:05 pm

Hi I’m a newbie here, and would just like to take a moment to say that I think this is a great site for anyone who wishes to learn how to improve and make windows xp better.

I would like to know if it will it be ok if I add the following Updatepack and addons with Ryan’s integrator 1.6.7z, and then modify my cd using Nlite 1.4.9.1 to remove stuff and make the final iso?

These are what I want to add

RVMUpdatePackSP3 1.0.3.7z or RED XP SP3_UpdatePack_03.09-01.7z (but not both)
Stimpy IE8-ADDON-ENU-V1.0.2.7Z
DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.4.7z

Also, can I add these all in one go, or do I need to add each one at a time, and are the addons in the correct order? Also should I tick the optimize system files box?

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

User avatar
litemirrors
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:23 pm
Location: Burbank, CA

Post by litemirrors » Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:01 pm

Take a look here for a complete list of suggested addons http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6994

Basically I would go for the following instead

Post-SP3 by Onepiece (DX9, IE8, WMP11 are included)
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6438

.Net Framework by Stimpy
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6431

Always use the "Optimize" checkbox
There should be no correct ordering for your addons you desire, IMO

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:11 pm

sderenzi wrote:Always use the "Optimize" checkbox
Not sure why it's required, but I never use it.

Silverarrow
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Silverarrow » Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:00 am

Thanks redxii for the link to your addons, also thanks sderenzi for the info. I think that I will use Stimpy_JD976_DotNetFx_3in1_Addon_v2.2.7z instead of DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.4.7z

retalion
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:34 am

Post by retalion » Sun Apr 12, 2009 2:20 pm

The resetwmi you're using is quite old, later version is out.

ret

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:51 pm

retalion wrote:The resetwmi you're using is quite old, later version is out.
It really doesn't matter which version is used. The only "updates" to resetwmi have been inconsequential things like changes to the build process, adding a 64-bit version, typo fixes in the comments, etc.--nothing that affects the actual function of the original 32-bit binary. The files get updates so that all my sources are in sync (and so that people hoping to use it as sample code get the latest source), but the updates are all silent because there is no reason whatsoever for current users to grab the new version.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:17 pm

Updated.

Made a silent update, set the wrong path for two of the files and forgot to fix it. Doesn't affect anything important, just aesthetic.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:24 am

Thank you for the (very fast) update :)

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Tue May 12, 2009 10:25 pm

There are no more security updates, ever. Vulnerabilities are all dried up, and Hell hath reported an unseasonable temperature of -961.85 Celsius.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Wed May 13, 2009 2:05 pm

Hehehe. Thanks again Red. ;)

User avatar
compstuff
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Florida

Post by compstuff » Fri May 15, 2009 2:32 pm

Thanks VERY MUCH Red..

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sat May 16, 2009 11:16 am

I was just building a new image with RVMi, and after installation, qfecheck reported that KB923561 should be reinstalled. And the optional KB909520 update (the Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider Package) is not included. Is the latter on purpose?

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Sat May 16, 2009 12:23 pm

I don't remember adding KB909520.

Qfecheck doesn't give me any errors.. all I did was set the MSRT version key and bump the update pack version, that's it, so if you're just now seeing that error another addon is causing the error for you.

I set one of KB923561's files, sysmain.sdb, to the wrong path in the Updates key.. but still, I do not have any errors from qfecheck. That doesn't mean the hotfix isn't correctly installed.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sat May 16, 2009 1:26 pm

I don't integrate much (since I prefer switchless), and the other addons that I use never gave problems before with RMVi or your pack ;)

RED_XP_SP3_UpdatePack_05.09-01.7z
RedDXRuntimes_0.7.0_32bit.exe
WGA_Validation_AddOn_1.9.40.0-2_-_redxii.7z
Kels_Runtimes_addon_v5.2.rar
HashCheck-2.1.8-Addon.7z
xable_CalcPlus-v1.3_addon.cab
Boooggy's WMP11 slipstreamer


Hmm, could be that nLite goofed something, I use it for some tweaks at the very last. On the other hand, I use a preset for that, and I haven't changed it for ages.

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Sat May 16, 2009 11:23 pm

Try replacing the inf on the disk with this new one: http://red.caek.org/XPSP3Upd.in_

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sun May 17, 2009 5:46 am

Thank you, I'm going to try it and let you know. :)

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sun May 17, 2009 1:10 pm

It's working now. Thanks again. :)

Post Reply