Onepiece Win2k postSP4 UpdatePack v5.0.3 FINAL
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:40 am
When integrating this win2k update pack and the directx update pack i get these errors while installing windows 2000. I noticed also that wmp 9 wont run, it gives an error. I am using nlite for the integration, Im gonna try it with the other intergrating app and i will report back later on. Thanks for the time creating these packs....
http://i36.tinypic.com/2wfljxv.jpg
and
http://i37.tinypic.com/2q30k7b.jpg
http://i36.tinypic.com/2wfljxv.jpg
and
http://i37.tinypic.com/2q30k7b.jpg
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
@alphasurfer: in first screenshot, if you click OK and give the path of wmp9 files in CD, W2k setup goes on? If yes, could you verify in dosnet.inf and txtsetup.sif files if Plylst1.wpl is listed?
Could you also test an integration with RVMi 1.5.4 beta and see if you have the same result? Unfortunately we can't reproduce this error and we need your help...
thx
Could you also test an integration with RVMi 1.5.4 beta and see if you have the same result? Unfortunately we can't reproduce this error and we need your help...
thx
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:40 am
Thanks for the reply! I intergrated using rvmi and all was well. I think somehow nlite screwed things up when i removed some components from win2k, I made sure to keep all wmp and even internet explorer but somehow it must have removed the needed things. RVMi is what i will use for now on for intergrating!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:12 pm
8.3 long name support?
Thank you for making this software, and making it possible for an up-to-date windows 2000 install.
I have a request, i noticed how when i integrate your latest release (3.4.0) that in ryanvm int, a file (wsus3setup.cat) exceeds 8.3 long name support. I need this support, sometimes i have to start the windows install via dos mode (winnt.exe) It complains about the file missing. I would normal not need this, but i encountered a laptop without a cd-install option.
I was wondering tips or ways on how to optimize this file for compatibility.
thanks!
I have a request, i noticed how when i integrate your latest release (3.4.0) that in ryanvm int, a file (wsus3setup.cat) exceeds 8.3 long name support. I need this support, sometimes i have to start the windows install via dos mode (winnt.exe) It complains about the file missing. I would normal not need this, but i encountered a laptop without a cd-install option.
I was wondering tips or ways on how to optimize this file for compatibility.
thanks!
I'm having a problem with Update Pack 3.3 and 3.2 (haven't tried 3.4 yet) under VMware Workstation 6.5. WMP 9 is not the default player, and trying to make it the default player has no effect. You can check all the file extensions off but they don't stay checked when you restart WMP.
Is this a known issue because WMP9 is not officially supported under W2K? Any work-around, or should I just manually register all the extensions?
EDIT: I've tried both nLite (1.4.9.1) and RyanVM Integrator (1.5.3).
Is this a known issue because WMP9 is not officially supported under W2K? Any work-around, or should I just manually register all the extensions?
EDIT: I've tried both nLite (1.4.9.1) and RyanVM Integrator (1.5.3).
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
@mikeypsquared: yes, it's so because if a new MU/WU engine is installed, then there will be no duplicated .cat files, one with 8.3 filename and the other with long one.
To work around this before update pack integration, you should extract wsus3setup.cat and rename it in 8.3 standard (i.e. wsus3stp.cat) and change every referral in entries.ini from wsus3setup.cat to wsus3stp.cat.
If you have already integrated Update pack in CD you must uncab wsus3setup.ca_ file, rename it as wsus3stp.cat and recab it; then extract syssetup.in_ file, find wsus3setup.cat and change in wsus3stp.cat. Do the same with dosnet.inf e txtsetup.sif.
To work around this before update pack integration, you should extract wsus3setup.cat and rename it in 8.3 standard (i.e. wsus3stp.cat) and change every referral in entries.ini from wsus3setup.cat to wsus3stp.cat.
If you have already integrated Update pack in CD you must uncab wsus3setup.ca_ file, rename it as wsus3stp.cat and recab it; then extract syssetup.in_ file, find wsus3setup.cat and change in wsus3stp.cat. Do the same with dosnet.inf e txtsetup.sif.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:12 pm
thank you nonno fabio! Your solution worked, and in fact it worked with my just renaming the references in entries.ini
However, I'm having the same results as what Donovan posted, and i included screenshots to show you. WMP is the default media player, however with few filetypes.
When you open wmp, you can't set default file types, (can be done manualy) whether you use the select all, or manual select it to handle all those file types, it won't apply those associations.

Also another bug that wasn't discovered until now is the roxio burning for wmp is doesn't function at all. wmp cannot initialize and prompt me to reboot my computer(which i did, and retried). burning any music is broken in this wmp

So i decided to see if it was just my computer and vm 6.5, and so i installed copy of windows 2000, and install updates along with updated wmp, ie, direct x. And everything works. I'm pretty sure its not my pc, or installation disc for 2000, i use the OEM. This is a screenshot of what everything should look and work like

Im pretty sure this is a bug within this release along with your WMP addon(tried both) You can try yourself. I have not applied any custom tweaks to the windows, this is a clean win2k sp4 oem disc.
However, I'm having the same results as what Donovan posted, and i included screenshots to show you. WMP is the default media player, however with few filetypes.
When you open wmp, you can't set default file types, (can be done manualy) whether you use the select all, or manual select it to handle all those file types, it won't apply those associations.

Also another bug that wasn't discovered until now is the roxio burning for wmp is doesn't function at all. wmp cannot initialize and prompt me to reboot my computer(which i did, and retried). burning any music is broken in this wmp

So i decided to see if it was just my computer and vm 6.5, and so i installed copy of windows 2000, and install updates along with updated wmp, ie, direct x. And everything works. I'm pretty sure its not my pc, or installation disc for 2000, i use the OEM. This is a screenshot of what everything should look and work like

Im pretty sure this is a bug within this release along with your WMP addon(tried both) You can try yourself. I have not applied any custom tweaks to the windows, this is a clean win2k sp4 oem disc.
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
WMP9 addition needs to be rebuilded from scratch.
Those issues will be solved in a next release.
Thanks you all for pointing them out
Those issues will be solved in a next release.
Thanks you all for pointing them out
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
Nice pack, but you should add the EnableBigLba registry entry to enable support for >128MB hard disk access on atapi controllers by default:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098
Although support for 48-bit LBA is included in Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3) and later,
it is still necessary to create the registry change that is described in the "Resolution" section of this article.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098
Although support for 48-bit LBA is included in Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3) and later,
it is still necessary to create the registry change that is described in the "Resolution" section of this article.
Never know what life is gonna throw at you.
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Thanks for suggestion.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:12 pm
Driver issues
Thank you for the updated release, and taking the time to completely rebuild the wmp. I am encountering a few errors, and i'm sure this issues weren't in previous releases.
I'm not 100% on what the issue is, just the symptoms include weird device driver install issues. I have confirmed this with nlite and ryanvm(1.5.4)
Whenever you plug in, say a flash drive, it goes to automatically install it(like it should) then it found new hardware, and you have to click next, etc. And it does find the drivers, however i have to click though a bunch of next, and yes i want to install this with no digital signature. A normal windows 2000 install, wouldn't even promt me, but install it automatically. Again, this problem has not surfaced in your previous releases. I am using a non-modified windows 2000 disc. I am integrating it on a windows xp host.
A normal windows 2000 install would normally just install it, and automatically install the thing. This isn't such a serious issue, just kind of an annoyance.
I have tried removing 'warn me if i install unsigned drivers' to ignore, various drive prompts in gpedit.msc, and removing WFP. It has the same symptoms as nlite setting where u can remove all the cat files, to save time on t39 installs. I've even tried microsofts registering re-registering of files
a screenshot can be seen here
i don't know where the issue resides, but i think it has something to do with catalog files, because i've seen this issue appear when i once used nlite to strip out catalog drivers and wfp. Please try yourself if you have a flash drive or any other device windows should work out of the box. I don't know much about making a pack, but perhaps u can see what you did in your older packs to make drivers not prompt?
I'm not 100% on what the issue is, just the symptoms include weird device driver install issues. I have confirmed this with nlite and ryanvm(1.5.4)
Whenever you plug in, say a flash drive, it goes to automatically install it(like it should) then it found new hardware, and you have to click next, etc. And it does find the drivers, however i have to click though a bunch of next, and yes i want to install this with no digital signature. A normal windows 2000 install, wouldn't even promt me, but install it automatically. Again, this problem has not surfaced in your previous releases. I am using a non-modified windows 2000 disc. I am integrating it on a windows xp host.
A normal windows 2000 install would normally just install it, and automatically install the thing. This isn't such a serious issue, just kind of an annoyance.
I have tried removing 'warn me if i install unsigned drivers' to ignore, various drive prompts in gpedit.msc, and removing WFP. It has the same symptoms as nlite setting where u can remove all the cat files, to save time on t39 installs. I've even tried microsofts registering re-registering of files
a screenshot can be seen here
i don't know where the issue resides, but i think it has something to do with catalog files, because i've seen this issue appear when i once used nlite to strip out catalog drivers and wfp. Please try yourself if you have a flash drive or any other device windows should work out of the box. I don't know much about making a pack, but perhaps u can see what you did in your older packs to make drivers not prompt?
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
your setuperr.log file would help us.
However UpdatePack patches Syssetup.dll file: this causes t-39 non signed driver message but you can easily avoid them, if you have a Winnt.sif file in your I386 directory adding the famous driver signing policy exclude lines
However UpdatePack patches Syssetup.dll file: this causes t-39 non signed driver message but you can easily avoid them, if you have a Winnt.sif file in your I386 directory adding the famous driver signing policy exclude lines
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:12 pm
my setuperr.log in the %windir% contains this:
I have installed windows with and without the winnt.sif; changing this has no effect, but my i think the line u were referring to was DriverSigningPolicy=Ignore. My winnt.sif reads:
It prompts for every pnp driver windows normally would just install. To give more examples, alot of times when installing windows sound drivers, it installs the drivers, but promts for every driver that could be attached to a sound device such as audio codecs, kernel hardware mixer, etc.
I tried patching the WFP(windows file protection) to be off. during and after the install. So whether WFP is on or off, the files in setuperr.log are still having issues
Code: Select all
Error:
Setup detected that the system file named [c:\winnt\inf\drvindex.inf] is not signed properly
by Microsoft. This file could not be restored to the correct Microsoft version.
Use the SFC utility to verify the integrity of the file.
***
Error:
Setup detected that the system file named [c:\winnt\system32\syssetup.dll] is not signed properly
by Microsoft. This file could not be restored to the correct Microsoft version.
Use the SFC utility to verify the integrity of the file.
***
Code: Select all
[Data]
UnattendedInstall="Yes"
[Unattended]
UnattendMode=DefaultHide
UnattendSwitch="Yes"
DriverSigningPolicy=Ignore
NonDriverSigningPolicy=Ignore
I tried patching the WFP(windows file protection) to be off. during and after the install. So whether WFP is on or off, the files in setuperr.log are still having issues
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Syssettup.dll is normal: you can ignore it because the original syssetup file is restored at the end of installation.mikeypsquared wrote:my setuperr.log in the %windir% contains this:
I have installed windows with and without the winnt.sif; changing this has no effect, but my i think the line u were referring to was DriverSigningPolicy=Ignore. My winnt.sif reads:Code: Select all
Error: Setup detected that the system file named [c:\winnt\inf\drvindex.inf] is not signed properly by Microsoft. This file could not be restored to the correct Microsoft version. Use the SFC utility to verify the integrity of the file. *** Error: Setup detected that the system file named [c:\winnt\system32\syssetup.dll] is not signed properly by Microsoft. This file could not be restored to the correct Microsoft version. Use the SFC utility to verify the integrity of the file. ***
It prompts for every pnp driver windows normally would just install. To give more examples, alot of times when installing windows sound drivers, it installs the drivers, but promts for every driver that could be attached to a sound device such as audio codecs, kernel hardware mixer, etc.Code: Select all
[Data] UnattendedInstall="Yes" [Unattended] UnattendMode=DefaultHide UnattendSwitch="Yes" DriverSigningPolicy=Ignore NonDriverSigningPolicy=Ignore
I tried patching the WFP(windows file protection) to be off. during and after the install. So whether WFP is on or off, the files in setuperr.log are still having issues
We aren't sure but when RVMi repacks Driver.cab, Drvindex.inf lost its signature. However we haven't never seen issues about this.
USB issue happens only in a few systems but we weren't ever able to reproduce it: Winnt.sif usually works.
Could you post a QFEcheck.log? thanks
@shon3i: I really don't know. Onepiece is very screwed up with his PC problems
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
@mikeypsquared:
Copy from a clean win2k sp4 CD LAYOUT.inf file in your %windir%\inf folder, overwriting existing one. This should solve the issue.
Copy from a clean win2k sp4 CD LAYOUT.inf file in your %windir%\inf folder, overwriting existing one. This should solve the issue.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
I've tried now but links seems to work
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
- OnePiece Alb
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Albania
- Contact:
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
It isn't included yet.
The beta LBA addon will be probably re-released in setupreg.hiv mode and then included in a future UP.
The beta LBA addon will be probably re-released in setupreg.hiv mode and then included in a future UP.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
link is restored.
Sorry for the inconvenience
Sorry for the inconvenience
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
updated.
Now Update Pack includes .Net 1.1
Now Update Pack includes .Net 1.1
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
I'm getting an error after integrating the pack in Windows Server 2000 SP4. It was asking me to insert the "Windows 2000 Professional" disk in the drive. When I said OK and clicked Browse, the file it needed, "xmleula.rt_" was there in the I386 folder of the CD. I just selected it and clicked ok. After clicking ok now, setup continued. But after copying files and installing some middle COM+ or something like that stuff, it restarted the OS. I was running on VirtualBox. I tried on VMware too, but the same problem.
Do you have any idea what's wrong with it ? I integrated the pack with Windows 2000 Professional and its working fine.
Do you have any idea what's wrong with it ? I integrated the pack with Windows 2000 Professional and its working fine.

-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:

Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
Mate seriously. I really need that thing in urgent. I'm out of time already. If you want a list of things I tried to sort out, here is it. I tried my best, but seriously I can't do anything without. I just need to get rid of those 2 files.nonno fabio wrote:
I tried in following environments
1. Tried in VMware
2. Tried in VirtualBox
3. Tried in Parallels
4. Tried in Microsoft Virtual PC
5. Tried in my live system (It was hard due to my existing Windows 7

I tried with following software
1. Tried integrating with RMVi on Clean Windows 2000 SP4 Server
2. Tried integrating with nLite on Clean Windows 2000 SP4 Server
Everything's giving me that error. Also some things I've tried.
1. I've extracted the update pack and edited all files and removed all entries of
xmleula.rt_ and xmleula.rtf
9seriesd.wm_ and 9seriesd_wmz
from all files in the extracted files
2. Repacked it with 7zip and again integrated into clean source with RMVi and nLite too.
3. Same thing's happening.
Again.... I had a hope that there has to be some way to do this, googled a lot. Then did one thing, extracted the whole ISO and again removed all entried of those files.
Did again all that blabla, on every environment, but same problem. So you are my only and last hope. I just can't do anything from now. I sent you a PM and you didn't replied.
I know there's earthquake in italy and you're safe mate.

Would you mind giving me a quick solution. I want to help you to help me. What do I need to provide to you ? I will post all files you need. I just need to sort out that problem.
So please please please please please, help me to sort out that problem. Seriously, if you tell me how do you do that magic of creating the update pack, may be I can help you to write a documentation.
Thanks in advance, hoping to get support my friend.

- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Sorry, I can't help you by myself: I've already informed Onepiece about your issue but he hasn't replied yet; I know he's very busy at the moment.
I'm sure he will verify and reply as soon as possible. But I hope you know that an Update Pack is not a software and it hasn't technical support...
I'm sure he will verify and reply as soon as possible. But I hope you know that an Update Pack is not a software and it hasn't technical support...
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
No, I'm sorry. I thought you are Onepiecenonno fabio wrote:Sorry, I can't help you by myself: I've already informed Onepiece about your issue but he hasn't replied yet; I know he's very busy at the moment.
I'm sure he will verify and reply as soon as possible. But I hope you know that an Update Pack is not a software and it hasn't technical support...

And yes, Update Pack does the more important work than a software can do and that's why technical support is must. I would love to provide the support here when he's busy. Its just that I don't know how things work.
By the way, thanks for your support.

-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Yes, because the pack is intended for Windows 2000 Professional only.
Add this small addon in your integration list to fit 2000 Server
Add this small addon in your integration list to fit 2000 Server
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
Thanks mate for the quick reply and solutions. I've downloaded the file and building it with nLite. Will report back you soon.nonno fabio wrote:Yes, because the pack is intended for Windows 2000 Professional only.
Add this small addon in your integration list to fit 2000 Server

-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
I'm sorry. That addon was created some times ago for an italian user who needed to update a w2k server source and it worked flawlessly.
Actually there would be no need for such addon because, as you did, this could be solved giving the right path to the requested files during setup.
The only difference in setup infs is this:
Professional:
Server:
But probably there's something else: you wrote that you got the issues even with UpdatePack only on a clean SP4 source using RVMi 1.6.1b2.1 without touching anything, isn't so?
Actually there would be no need for such addon because, as you did, this could be solved giving the right path to the requested files during setup.
The only difference in setup infs is this:
Professional:
Code: Select all
[SourceDisksNames.x86]
1 = Windows 2000 Professional CD,\cdrom_ip.5,,\i386
Code: Select all
[SourceDisksNames.x86]
1 = Windows 2000 Professional CD,\cdrom_is.5,,\i386
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
i use rvmi 1.53 and upack 3.7 both on win2k pro and advserver, win2kpro passed all windows update check , but not on advserver , WU tells missing ROLLUP1V2 hotfix KB891861, i changed disk label and also some other sfc files , nothing worked , finally i found "llsrv.exe" is older version, as in rollupv1 , it is newone:) and it is server only file:) hope u guys know that and do some change
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
Sorry mate for the late reply. I was thinking there's some problem in my actual source, so I just tried some other clean SP4 source. Tried integrating with nLite and RVMi 1.6, both things are giving me same problem of browsing those 2 files. I checked for errors in my update pack, but the hash is same.nonno fabio wrote:I'm sorry. That addon was created some times ago for an italian user who needed to update a w2k server source and it worked flawlessly.
Actually there would be no need for such addon because, as you did, this could be solved giving the right path to the requested files during setup.
The only difference in setup infs is this:
Professional:Server:Code: Select all
[SourceDisksNames.x86] 1 = Windows 2000 Professional CD,\cdrom_ip.5,,\i386
But probably there's something else: you wrote that you got the issues even with UpdatePack only on a clean SP4 source using RVMi 1.6.1b2.1 without touching anything, isn't so?Code: Select all
[SourceDisksNames.x86] 1 = Windows 2000 Professional CD,\cdrom_is.5,,\i386
Also then I checked txtsetup.sif as you said, I found no entries of cdrom_ip in that. All entries are related to cdrom_is. Then I scanned the whole directory for the cdrom_ip using ultraedit "search in files" feature, but not found a single entry of that.
if you need logs of anything, ask me. I will be happy to provide you those.
Thanks in advance and once again sorry for late reply. As I was getting another source, just to make sure the source is clean and there's no problem at my side.
Waiting for your reply.

-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:56 am
Yay, its me creating multiboot DVD.Kelsenellenelvian wrote:OMG
Extract update pack
open entries.ini
Delete the offending file names lines. xmleula.rtf & 9seriesd.wmz
Add:
[obsoletefiles]
xmleula.rtf
9seriesd.wmz
to the bottom of the entries.ini

Anyways, I extracted that. Removed all entries of those files and inserted the
Code: Select all
[obsoletefiles]
xmleula.rtf
9seriesd.wmz
Still there coming the same prompt. But another gotcha, when I browse the file and continue the install, computer(virtual machine) is restarting. No idea why its happening, but I guess setup requiring those files because they are not actually from the 7zip update thingy, xmleula.rtf may be coming from MSI of xml setup. Though no idea what's its scope or how to remove it.
Its becoming more and more critical.
