[Release] Kels' Runtimes v8.8

Discuss & post Update Pack addons here.
Post Reply
RedWine
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:54 pm
Location: Poland

Post by RedWine » Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:26 am

<>

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:52 am

Well shit I must be blind...

Thanks, now the question is to you guys:

JUST the dll's or both the dll and ocx files? (Active x controls)

HosseinMoradi
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:15 am

Post by HosseinMoradi » Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:09 am

list of files to update :
msstdfmt.dll
msstkprp.dll
ComCt232.ocx
comctl32.Ocx
ComDlg32.ocx
dblist32.Ocx
mci32.Ocx
mscomct2.ocx
mscomctl.ocx
MSComm32.Ocx
MSDatGrd.ocx
MSDatLst.Ocx
MSFlxGrd.ocx
MSINET.Ocx
msmask32.ocx
MSWINSCK.ocx
PicClp32.Ocx
richtx32.Ocx
sysinfo.Ocx
TabCtl32.Ocx

list of files to add :
MShflxgd.ocx

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:14 am

OK I can do that

I just am tired and got overwhelmed by the thought of adding so much!

User avatar
Kiki Burgh
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:40 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Post by Kiki Burgh » Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:45 am

hello kel! link leads to page cannot be displayed ... thanks!
-KIKI-

HosseinMoradi
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:15 am

Post by HosseinMoradi » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:44 am

it's not adding so much!
it's adding one file and updating the rest

lacrima1980
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:18 am

Link

Post by lacrima1980 » Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:36 am

Download link not working....

User avatar
litemirrors
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:23 pm
Location: Burbank, CA

Post by litemirrors » Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:20 pm

I concur link does not work :| perhaps he took it down to update?

Please tell me why when I goto http://www.wpiw.net/downloads/addons access is denied. Why deny access you might have more addons in the directory for me :| grr I want'm : hugs :

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:51 pm

Actually I can't give public access to dir. I have very little server controls. The server was donated and paid for untill 2010 August.

I did update this and upload it. I just forgot to update the first post after I ran my test.

As for there being more downloads in there I kinda doubt it because almost all of my addons where taken down. There is only like 2 dozen in there.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:06 pm

Thank you again for the update Kel. :)

User avatar
litemirrors
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:23 pm
Location: Burbank, CA

Post by litemirrors » Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:22 pm

Thank you, can you tell me me what other addons you make :D Will you ever make a theme pack bundle?!

Sereby
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Germany

Post by Sereby » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:49 am

kel: why did you revrtet vcomp90.dll from v9.0.30729.177 to v9.0.21022.8?
in last addon it was still present.

and almost all other .cat's are 1 day newer but 1kb smaller.. from where are they?

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:04 am

Sereby wrote:kel: why did you revrtet vcomp90.dll from v9.0.30729.177 to v9.0.21022.8?
in last addon it was still present.
Raise your hand if you have ever used an application that has used the vcomp library.

*chirping crickets*

I'd be surprised if you find even one consumer app that uses OpenMP. It's a library that I'd expect to see in scientific or cluster computing.

Anyway, I suspect that the most likely reason vcomp was reverted was because Kel based the sxs assemblies in his latest release on my rtl pack. As for why my rtl pack contains the RTM vcomp instead of a newer version, it's because that's the version that Microsoft has included in their vcredist package, and the vc8/9 sxs assemblies in my pack were extracted from their respective vcredist packages (instead of from the devel packages in the same VS hotfix). Microsoft uses the latest build of all the libraries in vcredist for VC9, with the exception of vcomp. I don't know why they do this, but I have guesses (perhaps because the only changes to vcomp between RTM and now has been version/compiler bumps). In contrast, VC8's vcomp libraries are updated in the vcredist package, probably because there have been notable changes. The cat file difference is probably related: my guess is that the people who packaged the devel runtimes are not the same as the people who packaged the vcredist runtimes, and that may result in the .cat discrepancy as well as the vcomp decision (maybe they included the debug libraries? I dunno; I haven't looked into it, nor do I really care). If you really care about this, you could write to Microsoft and ask why they only use RTM vcomp in their VC9 redist package, but I suspect that you probably don't since nobody ever uses OMP anyway.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

User avatar
V@no
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by V@no » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:05 pm

Hello!
I'm sorry, I don't have time and patience read all 560 replies in this topic. Can someone please explain and if possible add such explanation to the original topic - what do we do with this .rar file?
I have previous versions of this addon and all of them where .cab file with no extra .ini or such. These no needed any extraction, loaded in RVMIntegrator and you are good to go.

Thank you.

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:17 pm

You can load the RAR file into RVM Integrator or nLite like any other hotfix or addon.

User avatar
V@no
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by V@no » Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:31 pm

You are absolutely right, it was my mistake - tried add filename manually and misspelled it.
Sorry for the confusion.

willyeckerslike
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:46 am

Post by willyeckerslike » Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:12 am

Thank you for the runtimes Kel. I've integrated the pack into my XP disc without problems. Is there a way to integrate them into a Vista DVD?

User avatar
vmanda
Posts: 1634
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: TM.Romania

Post by vmanda » Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:01 am

You can use vlite.

willyeckerslike
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:46 am

Post by willyeckerslike » Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:22 pm

Thanks Vmanda. Can you please expand on your rather short answer. How would I use vlite to integrate this addon?

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:37 pm

I am sorry but he is mistaken.

vLite cannot integrate addons or programs. (Yet)

I could make a switchless but the 2005\2008 Visual Basic runtimes would be missing.

However roguespear DOES have a nice set of switchless addons for runtimes. I would go take a peek at his forum...

willyeckerslike
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:46 am

Post by willyeckerslike » Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:10 pm

Thank you Kelsenellenelvian. I have integrated silent installers with Vista Update Toolkit and your Vista uberpack and cpl pack integrate nicely and add much needed functionality.
Would it be possible to add the runtimes to their respective folders in Vista by mounting the Wim or is there more to it than that.
I will take a look at roguespears site also.

User avatar
fungus
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:52 pm

Post by fungus » Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:11 am

Thank you for the update Kel

geoslake
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:43 am

Post by geoslake » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:07 am

Hi

Thanks for the pack, but I'd like to know what it consists of.
I mean, I know that I need vc++ 2005sp1 and vc++ 2008 for some apps, but I don't know if those are included in your pack.

Thanks

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:29 pm

did you NOT read the very first post in this thread.

In case you need it, consider this a Personal Invitation.....

geoslake
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:43 am

Post by geoslake » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:14 pm

Sorry I don't understand.
I was asking if those vc++ things are included.
Of course I've read the first post, but all I see is a list of dll, which doesn't help me...
(as I don't know which dll's those vc++ - I was refering to - consist of)

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:30 pm

geoslake wrote:(as I don't know which dll's those vc++ - I was refering to - consist of)
Is it really that difficult to do a simple web search for c runtime dlls? You can also take a look at the breakdown in this post.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:14 pm

As you can see, we get a bit harsh around here when it's probably the users responsibility to a) read and b) google questions before coming in.

Sorry 'bout that but consider it an initiation of sorts.

And welcome!

User avatar
Nameless Mofo
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:18 pm

Post by Nameless Mofo » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:08 am

newsposter wrote:Sorry 'bout that but consider it an initiation of sorts.
Thank you sir may I have another! :lol: :twisted:

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4619
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:17 am


User avatar
ENU_user
Posts: 1253
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:42 pm

Post by ENU_user » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:55 am

..
Last edited by ENU_user on Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

geoslake
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:43 am

Post by geoslake » Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:51 am

code65536 wrote:
geoslake wrote:(as I don't know which dll's those vc++ - I was refering to - consist of)
Is it really that difficult to do a simple web search for c runtime dlls? You can also take a look at the breakdown in this post.
I did search (before posting) on the vc++ 2008 download page, but it didn't show which dll were inside.
Moreover, do you really think i wanna list them all, and compare to the dll's included in the addon ?
Why not just stating in the first post something like "when integrating this, you won't need to install : vc++ 2008, 2005 sp1 etc" ?
And your answers still don't help me sorry, all this is extremely confusing to me, but I guess the answer is "yes, they are both included" (?).

Thanks

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:08 am

geoslake wrote:I did search (before posting) on the vc++ 2008 download page, but it didn't show which dll were inside.
So it never occurred to you to cast a slightly wider net to determine what files are inside? (or more importantly, to find out what exactly the redistributable that you are asking for is supposed to be, because if you understood that, then you'd also understand that the actual file list is really not that important)
geoslake wrote:Moreover, do you really think i wanna [...]
That is the sort of attitude that will get people flamed on Usenet, in mailing lists, in forums, etc. Would the first post of this thread be better off with a friendly executive summary of what is included? Yes, definitely. Does your asking of a question that could have been answered (or at least mostly answered) by just a few minutes of Googling represent a breach of etiquette? Yes. More importantly, note that the first of these two observations does not invalidate the latter.

This would not have drawn ire: "It appears that this addon contains the runtimes of the VC8/9 redist packages, but I just want to confirm that both packages are fully included since the first post does not do a very good job of indicating this."

And chances are, you are now thinking, "But wouldn't it have been easier for you to just say 'yes' instead of being all snarky and abrasive about it?" Yes, it probably would have been in the short term. And that's what I used to do, years ago, in various newsgroups, mailing lists, and other forums. But I found that providing such answers only invited others to abdicate their obligations and ask similar questions.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

geoslake
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:43 am

Post by geoslake » Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:43 am

code65536 wrote:So it never occurred to you to cast a slightly wider net to determine what files are inside?
So could you give me the exact words I should have typed in to get the answer - that seem so obvious ?
Thanks

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Sat May 09, 2009 11:36 am

Updated...

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Sat May 09, 2009 4:51 pm

Thank you Kel. :)

willyeckerslike
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:46 am

Post by willyeckerslike » Sat May 09, 2009 5:33 pm

Ta very much.

User avatar
ahmerkhan
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:02 am
Location: Pakistan
Contact:

Post by ahmerkhan » Sun May 10, 2009 9:26 am

ThankU Kel... Nice to see the USP10.DLL update...

User avatar
Mavericks choice
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:39 am
Location: Downunder

Post by Mavericks choice » Mon May 11, 2009 4:45 pm

Thanks for the update Kel

Cheers
MC.
The Man from Aus

User avatar
Knowone
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:42 am

Post by Knowone » Tue May 19, 2009 8:33 pm

Thanks, Kellen, highly appreciated.
Important is more than knowledge imagination
--Einal Bertstein

Shiva
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:11 am

Post by Shiva » Wed May 27, 2009 5:56 pm

KB957924-v2
ComCt232.ocx 6.0.98.16
ComCt332.ocx 6.7.0.9816
comctl32.Ocx 6.0.98.16
ComDlg32.OCX 6.1.98.16
dblist32.Ocx 6.1.98.16
mci32.Ocx 6.1.98.16
mscomct2.ocx 6.1.98.16
mscomctl.OCX 6.1.98.16
MSComm32.Ocx 6.1.98.16
MSDatGrd.ocx 6.1.98.16
MSDatLst.Ocx 6.1.98.16
MSFlxGrd.ocx 6.1.98.14
MShflxgd.ocx 6.1.98.16
MSINET.Ocx 6.1.98.16
msmask32.ocx 6.1.98.16
msstdfmt.dll 6.1.98.16
msstkprp.dll 6.1.98.16
MSWINSCK.ocx 6.1.98.16
PicClp32.Ocx 6.1.98.16
richtx32.Ocx 6.1.98.16
sysinfo.Ocx 6.1.98.16
TabCtl32.Ocx 6.1.98.16

Download﹕http://rapidshare.de/files/47323710/Updated.7z.html or http://www.mediafire.com/?jcncdndz1zm

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Wed May 27, 2009 6:31 pm

no one in their right mind is going to download runtimes from any place but the mfgrs original distro or archive.

User avatar
crashfly
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:39 pm
Location: Arkansas, USA

Post by crashfly » Wed May 27, 2009 10:02 pm

Well I must be in my "wrong" mind then. Since Kelsenellenelvian makes an excellent pack, it would seem that many people use his pack. I myself am included.
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous

How to Ask Questions the Smart Way

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Thu May 28, 2009 3:18 am

I was referring to packages that the newcomer, shiva, has pointed to.

Unknown user, critical system files, unvetted source.

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Thu May 28, 2009 7:48 am

newsposter wrote:critical system files
No, not really; these .ocx ActiveX controls are all but extinct (they were never really widely used back in the day, and now that they're a decade old, they are even less widely used); you'll be hard-pressed to find anything that still loads them. There is a reason I don't bother to include them in my runtimes pack.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Thu May 28, 2009 12:04 pm

yup, no sense splitting hairs, etc, etc.

User avatar
crashfly
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:39 pm
Location: Arkansas, USA

Post by crashfly » Thu May 28, 2009 12:49 pm

My bad. No harm intended. :oops:
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous

How to Ask Questions the Smart Way

User avatar
ENU_user
Posts: 1253
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:42 pm

Post by ENU_user » Thu May 28, 2009 6:28 pm

..
Last edited by ENU_user on Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Thu May 28, 2009 7:44 pm

OK guys enough please.

Quantity is the question in this pack.

My goal is to NEVER have a "Missing .dll" popup with this pack.

P.S. I have gotten good stuff from Shiva before and trust him\her rather well. (Thanks shiva)

Shiva
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:11 am

Post by Shiva » Fri May 29, 2009 4:47 am

KB957924-v2source
ComCt232.ocx 6.0.98.16
ComCt332.ocx 6.7.0.9816
.
..
...
TabCtl32.Ocx 6.1.98.16

Download﹕http://rapidshare.de/files/47323710/Updated.7z.html or http://www.mediafire.com/?jcncdndz1zmI Upload Files (Use “Universal Extractor 1.6” Extracted)

P.S My English isn't very good, So..... :oops: :oops:

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Sat May 30, 2009 7:42 am

Uploading new version now...

Post Reply