[Release] Printer UpdatePack and XPS Addon 1.2.0

Discuss & post Update Pack addons here.
yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

[Release] Printer UpdatePack and XPS Addon 1.2.0

Post by yumeyao » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:11 pm

What is this addon(or switchless installer) for:
1. The XPS Printer contains several common printer driver files, so making it a "true addon" saves space. Additionally, XPS Printer copies some files to driver cache, so we can just merge these files into driver.cab
2. For those who want to update their XP/2003's common printer drivers to latest, the "true addon" also updates them
3. As the reasons above, I decide to remove XPS in my .NET installer release. So this addon is to make it complete. Please note that .NET 3.0 installs without XPS Printer flawlessly only that XPS Viewer won't work because XPS Driver is not present.

Content:
==============================
COMMON PRINTER DRIVERS:
==============================
KB977225-v3(from vista):
(only in true addon)pcl4res.dll/0.3.5479.0
(only in true addon)pcl5eres.dll/0.3.5479.0
(only in true addon)pcl5ures.dll/0.3.5479.0
(only in true addon)ps5ui.dll/0.3.7601.21760
(only in true addon)pscript5.dll/0.3.7601.21760
unidrv.dll/0.3.7601.21760
unidrvui.dll/0.3.7601.21760
unires.dll/0.3.7601.21760

==============================
XPS PRINTER:
==============================
KB971276:
filterpipelineprintproc.dll/6.1.2600.5863
msxpsdrv.cat
msxpsdrv.inf
msxpsinc.gpd
msxpsinc.ppd
mxdwdui.gpd
mxdwdui.ini
printfilterpipelinesvc.exe/6.1.2600.5863
prntvpt.dll/6.1.2600.5863

KB977585(from vista):
mxdwdui.dll/0.3.6002.22298
xpsshhdr.dll/6.0.6002.22298

KB977225-v3(from vista):
mxdwdrv.dll/0.3.7601.21760
xpssvcs.dll/0.3.7601.21760


Compatiblity with updatepacks:
NOT compatible with Onepiece's updatepack because his pack already include this part.
Compatible with u_h's updatepack but each time you integrate his pack(for an over-integrating) you must select this addon too.
Compatible with XP/2003 x86 of any service pack level.

Credits:
Thanks to Onepiece, ricktendo64 and 5eraph, for they inspired me to make it fully compatible with both nLite and RVMi

Downloads: 2 releases are available:
  • True Addon: Updated Files's Info not added for compatiblity for both XP/2003.
    Please note you must integrate this addon "with an updatepack" or "as an updatepack" when using RVMi.
    YumeYao_Printer_UpdatePack_And_XPS_Addon_1_2_0.7z MD5: 05e6c78098f5ed1aaa7ccc9917ee2801
  • Switchless Installer(T-13 Addon):
    YumeYao_XPS_Installer_Addon_1_2_0.cab MD5: 09921db0290e5f93c35558222a92ca35
  • Additionally, there is a hybrid installer(T-13 Addon) contains both XPS and WIC for smaller installer size:
    Integrating True Addons is recommended!! This is only for use if you just want the installer.
    YumeYao_XPSWIC_Installer_Addon_1_2_0.cab MD5: 2b52b6cfce758dad7ee2edda909fcb4d
Version Info:
Ver 1.2.0 2011-8-14
Updated KB2165648-v2 to KB977225-v3.

Ver 1.1.2 2011-6-17
Updated KB2165648 to KB2165648-v2.

Ver 1.1.1 2011-3-10
Added KB2165648, replaces KB983237.

Ver 1.1.0 2010-8-27
Misc fix, including slightly setup routine compact.

Ver 1.0.0 2010-8-12
contains KB971276, KB977585 and KB983237
Last edited by yumeyao on Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:40 pm, edited 8 times in total.

jaynbe
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:37 pm

Post by jaynbe » Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:46 am

Thank you YumeYao, I highly appreciate your work.

RicaNeaga
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:59 am

Post by RicaNeaga » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:20 am

Could you clarify this for me... if I want to use your .net framework addon (that would probably include .net 4.0 in your next release from what I've read) and WIC is a pre-requisite (for net 4.0 the WIC in XP SP3 in not enough, a newer version like yours is needed), a true integration of both wouldn't be more suitable?

In other words... since your .net addon is T-13, a T-13 pre-requisite (I'm reffering to your hybrid installer) may cause integrating issues?

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:40 am

Yes a true integration of both is more suitable.

A "True Addon" is processed by the RVM Integrator/nLite so it doesn't matter if you combine them into a "hybrid true addon", the integration result is always same. That's why I don't release a "hybrid true addon".

Opposite, a "T-13 Addon"(or Switchless Installer) is almost not touched by RVMi/nLite, therefore if you don't combine them, you'll get 2 extra files(the installers), and if you combine them, you'll get 1.
The smaller size only applies to the discussion of Installer Versions, because they share common installation component, so make them 1 hybrid addon is a good way to reduce the size.

The pre-requisite of my .NET addon only need to be satisfied "right before the .NET installer starts", so even they are installed at T-13, it's totally safe and won't cause integrating issues as long as they are installed/integrated before the execution of my .NET installer.


To make it not confusing, I'd like to claim it here:
Personally I suggest the using of "true addon"s for both XPS and WIC, the installer is just for others who want install on a live system.
And for the VC++ Runtimes and MSXML6, each way(true addon/T-13 installer) has its own pros.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

RicaNeaga
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:59 am

Post by RicaNeaga » Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:02 am

Thank you very much for your extended answer. :)

MSXML6 isn't a problem for me, since I always use a clean SP3 source, and I always use Kel's Runtimes, so VC++ Runtimes isn't also an issue. Just wanted to make sure what's the safest way of integrating a newer WIC and printer / XPS addon for your .net pack... and now I know. :)

BTW... should I expect an imminent launch of your .net AIO (1.1+2.0+3.0+3.5+4.0)? :D

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 am

I expect it too.

Just a little bit off topic:
I decide to release .net in followings combinations:
2.0 (2000 / XP & 2k3)
2.0+1.1 (2000 / XP & 2k3)
2.0+3.0+3.5 (XP & 2k3)
2.0+3.0+3.5+1.1 (XP & 2k3)
**I havn't tested removing .NET 1.1 from 2k3 and running a install on 2k3 yet.

Then start a new thread, with:
4.0 Core/Full
4.0 Core/Full + 3.5 Full
4.0 Core/Full + 3.5 Full + 1.1

Well it's a huge amount of releases, so the final release may be different.

My current progress is:
2.0 3.0 3.5 done.
1.1 lite is done. optimization is almost done.
4.0 lite is partially done. optimization not started yet.
install script: I may need a confirmation here
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:02 pm

ty yumeyao, for confirming my theory...I also found out why the xps printer was not working in my updatepack (I was missing some copyfiles)

ccl0
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:56 am

Post by ccl0 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:43 am

what happens if i use this then use nlite to delete the old printer drivers from my xp source? i'm unsure if these two are related.

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:49 pm

ccl0 wrote:what happens if i use this then use nlite to delete the old printer drivers from my xp source? i'm unsure if these two are related.
Yes you may F-up your install, I add these to a section called KeepFiles in entries.ini of my updatepack to avoid this (works on nLite v1.4.9 and up)

Code: Select all

[KeepFiles]
unidrv.dll
unidrv.hlp
unidrvui.dll
unires.dll
Edit: now that I look on the nLite site I realize I was doing KeepFiles all wrong to begin with :P

So dont do it like the first one, do it like this

Code: Select all

[KeepFiles]
unidrv.dll,unidrv.hlp,unidrvui.dll,unires.dll

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:31 am

@rick,
KeepFiles is a good choice, I'll add it to my next release.

If you have downloaded XPS Essentials Pack you may understand how it is installed - it's totally different from what you may think from viewing KB971276.


@all,
What a fucking day I've suffered a power off in my apartment, the whole residence block was and still now is suffering that. I've just moved back to where my family used to live(how can you manage a life without power? no elevator, no water supply!). So I didn't do anything these 2 days. Now I'm here again.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:05 am

I had KB971276-v3 included in my updatepack as well as XPSEP, but it did not seem to install correctly...I realized why (I was missing a few CopyFiles)

vcangel
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:03 pm

Post by vcangel » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:49 pm

supprot -> YY !
from WMZ.lol

soporific
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:10 am

Post by soporific » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:01 am

Hey there yumeyao,

Just a heads up ... i added this addon to my unattended XP DVD and it screwed up IE for some reason ... i get a message about 'Framedyn.dll' not being found at T13 when installing SPTD and on reboot a few more error msgs. I removed that addon and my DVD builds and installs correctly.

i have lots of other addons going in as well so there could be compatibility issues, but i thought i'd give you this feedback

Cheers,
Sop.

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:03 am

Did you integrate this addon with an updatepack? Or did you integrate this addon as an updatepack?
yumeyao wrote:Please note you must integrate this addon "with an updatepack" or "as an updatepack".
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

soporific
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:10 am

Post by soporific » Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:21 pm

yumeyao wrote:Did you integrate this addon with an updatepack? Or did you integrate this addon as an updatepack?
yumeyao wrote:Please note you must integrate this addon "with an updatepack" or "as an updatepack".
I saw that but i assumed i could do it 'after' the update pack was integrated. My automated AutoIT builder integrates the update pack first (user_hidden's XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack) and then processes all the other addons it finds in the 4 addon folders i have set up (i have 4 OS options for my DVD).

So i should add a step before the standard addons get integrated and that is to create a new folder and integrate any addons in that folder as update packs. :)

That should work shouldn't it ??

Thanks for your help, and your awesome addons :D

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:22 pm

If you decide to integrate the addons in 2 steps, you should:
1. integrate u_h's updatepack and this addon
2. integrate other addons

--- OR ---
1. integrate u_h's updatepack
2. integrate all addons, but you should put this addon in the location of updatepack.

I suggest the former because it saves much time. The latter compresses driver.cab on each step, and the former only compresses it on the first step.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

soporific
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:10 am

Post by soporific » Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:49 am

yumeyao wrote:If you decide to integrate the addons in 2 steps, you should:
1. integrate u_h's updatepack and this addon
2. integrate other addons

--- OR ---
1. integrate u_h's updatepack
2. integrate all addons, but you should put this addon in the location of updatepack.

I suggest the former because it saves much time. The latter compresses driver.cab on each step, and the former only compresses it on the first step.
yay, great info. I'll definitely go with 1st method, cheers!

FYI - the reason i integrate in two steps is to save time re-doing the update pack integration for the other 3 OS options

User avatar
dumpydooby
Posts: 530
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:09 am

Post by dumpydooby » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:47 pm

YumeYao, I generally create two discs that I use, the first one has core updates, such as IE8, WMP11, hotfixes, and runtimes. Unsurprisingly, I prefer to include this with on that disc.

My second disc is based on the first one, except it include superfluous programs, including some "true" addons. When I run RVMI for this second disc, should I be including your addon as an update pack, or is that unnecessary (since it's in the first disc already)?

At the moment, I'm just including your pack every single time I run RVMI to play it safe, but I'm wondering if there are any adverse effects from doing this (repeated entries somewhere or whatever) or if this strategy is redundant.


Any advice would be appreciated.

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:30 pm

It is redundant and unnecessary.

The entries are fine, but if you include this pack every single time, then your driver.cab is compressed each time you do an integration, that will be insane.

I have answered another integration sequence question 3 posts above, that will also give you a clarification, I guess.

---- EDIT ----
I guess this line may confused you.
Compatible with u_h's updatepack but each time you integrate his pack(for an over-integrating) you must select this addon too.
Were you considering that you must select this addon each time on an over-integration?

But I meant you must select this addon each time on an over-integration OF U_H's UpdatePack, because u_h's updatepack overwrites some files from this addon -- just the same reason why WMP/IE is needed on an over-integration of his UpdatePack.

So do you guys have any idea how I can make it clear in the first post?
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
shiner
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:18 am
Location: SE Asia

Post by shiner » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:39 pm

It seems the "True Addon" is like an extension of U_H's update pack, (not an addon per se.)

Once its integrated, other typical addons, (excluding non-YY .NET AIO 3.0 and up??), can be integrated in one or more sessions without the need to re-integrate the XPS Printer True addon .
Would that be correct, YY?
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:07 am

Yes.
The True Addon updates driver.cab with some updated files and some new files.
In fact, my WIC addon may be considered as an extension of u_h's update pack, but it doesn't need updating driver.cab. This XPS addon needs updating driver.cab therefore it must be integrated as an updatepack or with an updatepack, in order to let RVMi update driver.cab.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:41 am

Updated True Addon to 1.1.0.

If you have already integrated 1.0.0, you can simply replace xpsspec.inf with the new one.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
dumpydooby
Posts: 530
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:09 am

Post by dumpydooby » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:11 am

My uncertainty came about because I'm having issues with my XP disc and I wanted to make sure that I had everything squared away with this pack since it had never been included on my disc before. The problem was that my first disc was working, but my second disc (based on the first) was not.

I've already confirmed my issue is unrelated to any of your stuff, however. I'm just letting you know that it wasn't your wording or anything. I was just double-checking.



Thanks for everything man. Hope your girl friend is doing better.

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:30 am

Forgot to protect files from nLite in entries.ini

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:15 am

updated silently with [KeepFiles]. Thx rick for reminding.

@dumpydooby,
I see, so now you can include this in your first disc, lol.
My girlfriend is diagnosed of Urticaria and she is fine now, thanks.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:59 am

Heads up yumeyao, KB2165648 replaces KB983237

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:30 am

Thanks rick, will update when I reach home.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:14 am

I am wondering weather to add pjlmon.dll

What do you think, will it work as well on XP as the other files?

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:27 am

I'd rather keep it as original.
If I recall correctly, other files have same x.y.z as XP's original files(assuming the version number is x.y.z.aaaa), but pjlmon.dll has a different version.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:14 pm

updated.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

RicaNeaga
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:59 am

Post by RicaNeaga » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:41 am

Does this help... http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=2505189 ? And thank you for the update. :)

Adrian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:02 am

Post by Adrian » Tue May 17, 2011 5:42 pm

no 64 bits here

User avatar
Kelsenellenelvian
Moderator
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: Pocatello, ID
Contact:

Post by Kelsenellenelvian » Wed May 18, 2011 7:45 am

Is that your way of asking or are you just being an ass and over-stating the obvious?

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Fri May 20, 2011 1:39 am

New update KB2165648-v2

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:58 pm

updated.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
shiner
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:18 am
Location: SE Asia

Post by shiner » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:30 pm

thanks
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

acus
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:41 pm
Location: italy

Post by acus » Sat Aug 13, 2011 3:36 pm

Hi yumeyao,

I found that files coming from KB977225 Vista x86 work fine with your addon.
After integrating it, I tried with a XP install in Virtualbox. A text file was correcttly printed with XPS printer.

http://support.microsoft.com/hotfix/KBH ... kbln=en-us

Regards

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 4:00 pm

This hotfix confirms that wi7 files are compatile with xp, thaks acus

acus
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:41 pm
Location: italy

Post by acus » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:32 am

@ricktendo

you're welcome.

Regards

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Sun Aug 14, 2011 4:58 am

Thanks for the info, haven't noticed that b4.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Sun Aug 14, 2011 9:20 am

updated.
Thanks again.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:47 pm

yy you may want to check out KB969744-v2 for Windows 7, it has newer files

Does not apply to you but weird thing is KB977225-v3 (vista) has pjlmon.dll with the same build string/date as most files in KB969744-v2 (seven)... but pjlmon.dll in the latter is from 7sp1 rtm

P.S. I think I will also take mxdwdui.dll from Windows 7 sp1 and add it to mine, xpsshhdr.dll I will keep the one from KB977585 until the 7 rtm one is updated

RedWine
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:54 pm
Location: Poland

Post by RedWine » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:35 am

@yumeyao files are missing.
Please update, thanks.
<>

roadrunner650
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:13 pm

Post by roadrunner650 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:54 am

@yumeyao,
kb977225,kb977585 are not in one-piece update pack.
Because of this, can I integrate this pack as an addon when integrating one-piece update pack?
In your 'incompatible' statement (1st post), are you telling us your addon will 'break' the integration (thus incompatible),
or are you simply saying it is not necessary because the files are redundant?
The 2 KB's above now make your pack no longer redundant. Therefore, if your pack will integrate, I have sufficient reason to use it.

Please clarify so I can do the right thing.
thanks, RR

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:39 pm

I'm not very sure about that.

As I concern, onepiece should have included in his update pack XPS printer, which doesn't only requires files to be copied but also needs a lot of registrations. So since I haven't checked how exactly onepiece's pack does on this part, I can't give a correct answer on this.

You may suggest him to include them.
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

soporific
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:10 am

Post by soporific » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:15 pm

I tried the FileSonic link and it says "File does not exist" ... any chance of a mirror or re-upload?

Thanks in advance

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:49 pm


User avatar
joll69
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:59 pm

Post by joll69 » Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:04 am

Does anyone have a mirror for YumeYao_XPSWIC_Installer_Addon_1_2_0.cab? Filesonic copy was removed.
Dok's Law: The simplicity of a solution is directly proportionate to its elusiveness.

User avatar
ricktendo64
Posts: 3213
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Honduras

Post by ricktendo64 » Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:28 am

I only have WIC will that do?

YumeYao_WIC_Update_Addon_1_2_0.cab
MD5: e07332f9934b85b6b1270a3e57fd1feb
Last edited by ricktendo64 on Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
joll69
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:59 pm

Post by joll69 » Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:32 am

I'll take what I can get. Thanks, Rick
Dok's Law: The simplicity of a solution is directly proportionate to its elusiveness.

Post Reply