Complete list of All XP 64bit SP2 KB's - x64 SP3 wannabe

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Update Pack discussion.
User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:22 pm

update 15.12.2008:
Much thanks to yumeyao & pavlov for these fine uploads!

KB952943 update over SP2.
KB960608 updates sp1 files, brilliant.
-Note the original file name is scHtasks.exe, it still updates correctly.
KB959336 replaces KB952630, it might also replace KB941773 which has 2 unique files for sp2, vdshba_i.mof and vdshba_u.mof. KB959336 does not have those 2 .mof files.
I dont know what they are yet. I'll see if i can dig something up..

edit: and i found out it's duplicate to vdshba_i.mo_ found in x64 sp2 retail, more or less seemingly. Ergo im nuking KB941773 as well.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

update 18.12.2008

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:06 pm

update 17.12.2008 :
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959873 - updates Wldap32.dll/Wwldap32.dll to 5.2.3790.4413 from sp2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960228 -Win32k.sys 5.2.3790.4415 replaces KB959466
update 18.12.2008 :
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960714 - IE 8 Beta 2 update. Unfortunately there's no current direct download link to this.
Added KB959338 to history list, its replaced by kb960228 already.
Moved 915800 to optional others, which is update to desktop search 3.01 ( a lot less bloat then 4.0), but i'll add 4.0 as well as an option to that again
notice 19.12.2008 - I could get 958939 integrated, but i couldnt find evidence it's useful in x64 xp. Only 2003.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

X-mas 2008 =)

Post by TranceEnergy » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:19 pm

update 22.12.2008 - KB960417 > kb944340 - kernel32.dll , new version : 5.2.3790.4417 vs old 5.2.3790.4180.
update 28.12.2008 - KB960007 > KB953876 - ole32.dll 5.2.3790.4413 QFE
New KB960680-v2. Updated history list with Kb959505, already outdated.
update 29.12.2008 - added KB960266 to history list.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Happy newyear 2009! =)

Post by TranceEnergy » Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:14 am

Update 02.01.2009 : added http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958353

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:44 am

kb930045 -> kb958476
KB933653 -> KB940349
KB937549 -> KB941560
KB938759 -> Imagehlp.dll superseded by KB958476(which supersedes kb930045 also), crypt32.dll superseded by KB950474(which is already included in your list). so we only needs wintrust.dll
kb942088 -> KB950224
KB952312 -> KB959202
kb953028 -> KB955692
KB953323 -> KB960253
kb956523 -> KB953955


hope it helps
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:01 am

Thanks. Most of the kb's you mention is already in the list, or the list is superceeding them. On that note however :

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953955
- cimwin32.dll 5.2.3790.4403
- replaces KB956523

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958476
- replaces KB930045

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960253
- replaces KB953323
- shell32.dll 6.0.3790.4423

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:34 am

update 06.01.2009:
KB955549 update over SP2 - KB958147 replaces kb950156 - KB960037 replaces KB948931.
update 08.01.2009 : KB961180 replaces KB953876

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:57 am

How do these listings fare against using 5eraph's update-pack? Which ones of the "Manual" method#2 install option are still 'needed' after updating with 5eraph's pack?

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:13 am

update :
KB958687 replaces KB957095 (srv.sys 5.2.3790.4425 GDR)- I had missed this one.

I myself have never used 5eraph's update package, so i wouldnt really know. While I have the utmost respect for 5eraph, I dont share the train of thought that it's best to just update "essential" parts or how i should put it, of the operating system (Not that that is necessarily his thoughts). The list i here have put forth aims to keep the system at the very edge of being as new as possible in every way. The idea i have is that if one are to have the system files anyway, why not have the latest version of that file?

I have been pondering upon adding GDR listing of each KB or such as well, but tbh the system stability of just the latest QFE versions are in my experience impeccable. Even with Ie 8 beta 2 in the system, tho i must add i only use IE to check windows updates are working.

Personally i only integrate Kb's that are under the headline with nlite, i dont use nlite for anything else then those therein listed:
KB's that are *integrated* with Nlite. Integrated = no svcpack

These 3 kb's wont be integrated by nlite properly in my findings, so i install them before nlite with a batch file approach :
manual\KB938464.exe /integrate:L:\znx64\ /nobackup /passive
manual\KB951759.exe /integrate:L:\znx64\ /nobackup /passive
manual\KB956807.exe /integrate:L:\znx64\ /nobackup /passive

where L:\znx64 is the source folder of image to be nlited.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/938464 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951759 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956807

This kb must be installed manually after windows is installed, nothing else works properly.:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=956391

All in all its just about learning what works and what does not. Trial and error to find solution is pretty much it.

As i also state, i also prefer to integrate all other kb's that nlite only puts in svcpack, manually instead of with nlite. The end result may just be the same, but it's just personal preference if nothing else, that nlite only does the work which i cannot do as easy, namely that of directly integrating updated files within the windows install image.

As to comparison to 5eraph's list you will have to check Kb differences yourself. In order to do that i would just copy name of all the kb's i list, then take away what 5eraph's list contains.

I dont plan to keep track of what updates 5eraph's pack contains versus this list though, that would again be something for the end-user to determine if is the path one wishes to take.

edit:

Of course now that i've said that curiousity kicks in, and i think i'll look into it, but i wouldnt hold my breath if i were you.
edit2:

I looked into this, and this complete list has so many updates that 5eraph's update pack does not have, listing all of them, well there's just not much point. It's far a shorter list to just look over what KB's are in 5eraph's update pack and erase those kb's from your own pack of updates to integrate on your install image.
All that aside, it would be a more natural choice to ask 5eraph what kb's are not done with his pack that are in this list. I say this because that update pack may affect KB's not listed per se, as far as i know. As i said from the start, i really have no way of knowing.

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:22 am

Thanks for your reply, sir. Much appreciated!
I usually get all hotfixes as linked by Aaron Kelley on his site. By the way, his hyperlinks are easier in that they link to the MS downloadpage directly. Yours don't.

Then I test all of them with nlite, and set aside those that did not work.
Next final run I integrate those that failed, and then afterwards nlite those that did not fail. Usually this goes alright, with a few mentions of files that are older and so I say to not overwrite the newer one in the image.

Same thing with 5eraph's updatepack. I just like to use that before nlite in order to be sure. His pack has a lot of updated files I didn't even have while using the normal sources. Don't know where he gets them from, but they're really newer versions.

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Re: Complete list of All XP 64bit SP2 KB's - x64 SP3 wannabe

Post by Passion » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:59 am

TranceEnergy wrote:KB's that *need* specific handling to be installed/Nlite integration failure totally:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951759
This link does not point to a downloadable file.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:22 pm

See :
Hotfix Download Available
View and request hotfix downloads

You can also search for KB's from hotfixshare as shown in post 1.

midnight update 15.01.2008 :

I'd like to send a special -= thank you =- to -> pavlov <- for his/her *continued* support to hotfixshare. Your efforts are most appreciated! Thanks!!!

KB955455 replaces KB952206
localspl.dll 5.2.3790.4336 QFE

KB960677 replaces KB940458
rdpdr.sys 5.2.3790.4424 QFE

As the list stands its not a download list, and i've written time again it simply just isnt and cannot be as is. The list as it is may still be used as an download list if one have a little knowledge of notepad skill and download manager, but i'm not going to write a how-to to leech a lot very fast from hotfixshare or other sites. Sorry.

Think of the list as a resource to find what you may miss or need to get what update or resolution to a problem you may have.

On that note, i would like to have direct download links, but there has been trouble to that end in the past, and frankly, once one have all kb's downloaded, all one have to do is to stay current with new updates. So in the end, it's more of a one-time deal to get all kb's one might desire.

It's a lot of updates, but such is simply the nature. It can't be helped.

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:45 pm

TranceEnergy wrote:See :
Hotfix Download Available
View and request hotfix downloads
Yeah, have you ever tried getting a file that way? It's the strangest myriad of website nonsense if I ever saw some!
TranceEnergy wrote:It's a lot of updates, but such is simply the nature. It can't be helped.
Of course it can be "helped", you just post a different link, namely the ones Aaron Kelley offers, i.e. to the downloadpage directly.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:22 pm

At some point it was the only way to get the KB's so yes i have, dozens upon dozens of times.
As it is one could download the language of one's choice for the updates. In any case i have already long time ago posted a few such links but no one responded whether or not it was working download for them.
And im not about to start finding 160+ download links on a whim, besides you dont understand that microsoft doesnt provide direct download links to many of these updates, and linking to direct download at hotfixshare was at least, not possible. Also it's a bit rude to setup such a leech system.

Basically, if i could, i would. But such is not the case.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:08 am

Sunday morning update 18.01.2009:

KB955407 replaces KB951202 - diskpart.exe 5.2.3790.4420 QFE.
KB960652 replaces kb960677 rdpdr.sys 5.2.3790.4437 QFE.
new KB959194 - updates various Background Intelligent Transfer Service files to 6.7.3790.4422 QFE. Actually all of the files in KB923845 , the BITS 2.5 installer, EXCEPT for the bitsinst.exe file in itself, i suppose its the kind of thing 5eraph could work around.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:32 am

Smallville mania update 24.01.2009 :

KB958910 direct update over sp2. inetpp.dll 5.2.3790.4417 QFE, Internet Print Provider DLL, tested and it integrates directly with nlite.
Welcome back hotfixshare =)

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:09 pm

A close family member of mine passed away recently under un-natural circumstances. If things are falling apart here, i hope you can understand. May you rest in peace my friend...
----------------------------------------------------------------

kb957097 replaced by 960882
mrxsmb.sys 5.2.3790.4441 QFE5.2.3790.4441

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:11 pm

It's been a tough week to get through, but i'm here...

I'll be adding back in IE7 after having tested IE8 extensively. The problem is that while IE8 beta 2 worked more or less just fine, the RC1 version is completely screwed over. My system has been very unstable since i installed RC1, getting all kinds of annoying error messages for no apparent reason. At the time of writing i could not find an official download mirror for IE 8 beta 2, which is the main reason for adding IE7 back in. Seeing as the final release date for IE8 seems also unstable, april/may perhaps? The whole affair of RC1 has been very disappointing.

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:09 am

TranceEnergy wrote:My system has been very unstable since i installed RC1, getting all kinds of annoying error messages for no apparent reason.
Same here. I even set back an entire system backup from before I installed IE8, despite of all the extra hassle that caused.

One of the weirdest things after installing IE8 was that it seemed to have forced WFP onto my system while it was turned OFF entirely. I could not get rid of command line errors that I have never seen before. My system simply refused to run certain cmd tools.

By the way, I added http://xp64.ma.cx/ as a nice short URL for XP x64 users..

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:41 pm

Thank you, i added that link.

Friday past midnight, as in saturday 7th of february 2009 update:

Added KB955543 (dmio.sys 5.2.3790.4442 (srv03_sp2_qfe.090108-1308) NT Disk Manager I/O Driver) Update over SP2 version.
Removed IE8 links, wrote a warning on the current IE8 status, added in IE7 with few updates. What a complete and utter failure Rc1 not to mention disappointment it has been.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:50 am

family guy forever update 12.02.2009 :
KB958756 replaces KB958655
- msi.dll 4.5.6001.22317 QFE, Windows Installer

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Sweet Revenge 16 february 2009 update.

Im pondering upon deleting old history list. Ie im a nostalgic guy but hmm..

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961260
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... laylang=en
- replaces KB958215

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/KB960715
Cumulative Security Update for ActiveX Killbits for Windows XP x64 Edition (KB960715)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... laylang=en
- replaces KB956391

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959207
ntdll.dll 5.2.3790.4450 QFE NT Layer DLL
- replaces KB944762

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:43 am

Everything ends in Fire small update 17feb 2009, ye ive been lazy lately.

Stole Kurt Aust's link =)

IMAPI_SRV2003_x64 updates files in KB932716 except cdrom.sys - Windows Feature Pack for Storage 1.0 - English (Blu-Ray support)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... layLang=en

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:44 pm

All out of milk and The Cows are all missing update 19 february 2009 :

KB953490-v2 replaces KB956841
- hal.dll same as in KB956841 (5.2.3790.4354)
- ntkrnlmp.exe 5.2.3790.4449 - replaces KB956841 (5.2.3790.4354)
- ntoskrnl.exe is also 5.2.3790.4449 - replaces KB956841 (5.2.3790.4354)
- all QFE.

KB961361 update over SP2
- oakley.dll - Oakley Key Manager - 5.2.3790.4451 QFE

Thanks a bunch to pavlov!

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:10 pm

In celebration of QuakeLive gone Open Beta - update 27.02.2009

Update for Windows XP x64 Edition (KB961118)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... 1873f0c7aa
Inbox Printer driver may be unsigned after you install the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1.
- ntprint.cat - digitally signed 09. januar 2009 21:47:57

WindowsMedia11-KB959772-x64-ENU.exe replaces kb945381 (11.0.5721.5246)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... 2d40eff6fe
- wmp.dll 11.0.5721.5260

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956438
- termdd.sys - 5.2.3790.4454 QFE - Terminal Server Driver - update over SP2

Microsoft has also released KB967715 (shell32.dll 6.0.3790.4315) which is already replaced by KB960253 (shell32.dll 6.0.3790.4423).

Now, i ran the KB967715 and it not replace the newer KB, so all is well. Checking into the version dates, KB960253 still is newer then the recent released 967715 - which after i run the 967715 installer it no longer shows up on windows update.

However, i would like to know what kind of registry key i have to add to bypass running the old kb, ill see if i can find it.

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:44 pm

This appears to be the only registry entry needed for KB967715:

Code: Select all

HKLM,"Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer","HonorAutoRunSetting",0x10001,1

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:20 pm

But that means to enable autorun does it not? What does the setting actually do? Disable or enable Autorun alltogether? Thanks for your input!

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961799
KB961799 replaces KB955860 (5.2.3790.4356)
- netbt.sys MBT Transport driver 5.2.3790.4452
NEW! Additional data needed to keep Windows update empty.

---- Add this registry info to avoid KB967715(or running the kb itself) showing up on windows update, KB967715 already replaced by KB960253.

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer]
"HonorAutoRunSetting"=dword:00000001



I run some registry file which applies a lot of settings, so thanks for the heads up! On a sidenote i find the forum controls difficult, i wish i found it easier to make things look nice/better.

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:18 pm

Re: KB967715

AutoRun can be disabled for a particular drive letter and/or for a particular drive type (e.g., you can disable AutoRun for all "removable" drives) through various registry keys that I will not delve into (the KB article mentions at least one of these keys). The problem was that autorun.inf would still be parsed (though the AutoRun program is not executed), and the autorun.inf can be crafted in such a way that the user could end up invoking the AutoRun program on a drive by, say, double-clicking the drive in Explorer, even if AutoRun was disabled for the drive. So the parsing of a disk's autorun.inf was a sort of a loophole around disabling AutoRun for that drive.

This was the crux of the security update (KB950582; also see KB953252, which was published alongside of and documents KB950582). KB950582 basically closed this loophole by disabling the parsing for autorun.inf if the drive has AutoRun disabled. The HonorAutoRunSetting was introduced in KB950582 (it's in KB950582's INF file) and its default value is 1. Setting this to 0 reverts to the old unsafe behavior and re-opens the loophole (so basically, read the key as "Honor the registry's AutoRun setting and really disable AutoRun for a drive with no loophole if the registry says so!").

What I don't get about KB967715 is why in heck it even exists. The file versions in KB967715 are identical to those found in KB950582. The HonorAutoRunSetting key was already present in KB950582. And since KB950582 was a security update, it was already available in GDR, and it was already widely distributed. KB967715 offers absolutely nothing new (even the documentation is identical to what already exists in KB953252), so Microsoft basically re-released an old security update as an outdated non-security update. WTF?
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:00 pm

code65536 wrote:What I don't get about KB967715 is why in heck it even exists. The file versions in KB967715 are identical to those found in KB950582. The HonorAutoRunSetting key was already present in KB950582. And since KB950582 was a security update, it was already available in GDR, and it was already widely distributed.
...except it was never widely distributed for XP x64...
Microsoft wrote:Non-Affected Software
  • Operating System

    Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

    Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

    Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2

User avatar
code65536
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: .us
Contact:

Post by code65536 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:19 pm

5eraph wrote:
code65536 wrote:What I don't get about KB967715 is why in heck it even exists. The file versions in KB967715 are identical to those found in KB950582. The HonorAutoRunSetting key was already present in KB950582. And since KB950582 was a security update, it was already available in GDR, and it was already widely distributed.
...except it was never widely distributed for XP x64...
Microsoft wrote:Non-Affected Software
  • Operating System

    Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

    Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

    Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2
That is true. IIRC, the release of KB950582 was a little strange: they first released it for 6.0, and only later did they release it for 5.x. But they nevertheless did release KB950582 for all 5.x variants, as a generally-available release with no WGA gating:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... 21D7B8DAA5
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... B28068147A

So it's still a little strange why they are re-releasing the same files under a new KB number.
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX

Into the breach, meatbags!

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:12 pm

Thanks for the awesome great clarification and explanations. I liked code 65536's "(so basically, read the key as "Honor the registry's AutoRun setting and really disable AutoRun for a drive with no loophole if the registry says so!"). " That kind of writing really makes stuff easy to understand. GJ.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:01 am

first update in march 04.03.2009 :
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/965230
- comsvcs.dll 2001.12.4720.4453 COM+ Services - An update over SP2.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Huge update coming...

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:42 pm

I'm currently doing a complete comparison towards 5eraphs february pack vs my files and the lists and have been working at this a couple of hours now.

Hence i will do some cleanup i've found, and try to cough up what KB's are not in 5eraph's pack etc. The initial results properly will require some double checking, i mean that would be nice.

The end result i hope will be the best basis yet for an x64 xp install.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:26 pm

Preliminary findings / work in progress, just saving what i've written down so far. The list of "files not in" _is_ complete however. Might need work, corrections, but i've gone through every KB at least one time.
Though i would like to double check it. At current time though, my eyes need rest..

update important note!: This list is based much upon that the actual content of what 5eraph has listed as being inside the update pack, truly is there. So that's mainly about what doublechecking will be or so, though you 5eraph could answear this. This complete list (as in post #1) has always been designed that if a KB stays in the list as long as it's contents hasn't been completely updated by other KB's. And the KB must update the default files found upon xp x64 with SP2.


update3:
effectively eliminated:

KB944043 : because ntdsa.dll, only remaining file, doesnt natively exist in xp x64 sp2.

update 4: found more... comments are what is needed from kb that is verified to exist in native xp x64 sp2.
----------------------------------------------
Files not in 5eraph's pack that can be directly integrated.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/919241
contains newer files then 5eraphs february pack.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930499
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933071
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/937549
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940569
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943172
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943509
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/944829
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/945778
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946118
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946198
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946504
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946517
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946633
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946813
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947354
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947870
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948704
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949729
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950037
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950426
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950676
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951347
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951851
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952943
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953176
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953675
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954057
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954091
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955843
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957052
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957089
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957492
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957585
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958147
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958353
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961118
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961799
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/965230
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967663


Files not in 5eraph's pack that are run from svcpack (not directly integrated)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941560
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956826
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959202

----------------------------------------------

already in 5eraph's pack (i think)


http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950224 replaces KB942088
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/KB952206 replaces KB955455
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961160 replaces KB940925
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940349 replaces KB933653


Post #1 updated.

941560, 956826, 959202 that are run from svcpack, it would be nice to see them in 5eraph's pack or perhaps removed for other reasons.
Last edited by TranceEnergy on Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:39 pm, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:57 am

I've started going over list again and doing file-by-file comparisons

I've found this to be newer then the 5eraph's february update pack. (Spent 2 hours doing this alone)

KB919241
autochk.exe untfs.dll 5.2.3790.4263

KB961799 netbt.sys 5.2.3790.4452

Edited post #1 : Lines starting with *** indicates that it contains contents not found in 5eraph's pack.

update :

KB960831 replaces KB959336
Virtual Disk Service 5.2.3790.4467

KB967663 update over sp2
- splwow64.exe 5.2.3790.4457 Thunking Spooler APIS from 32 to 64 Process


With this overhaul over the last day, the list should be quite if not completely updated. However, i would like to take time to read properly through the entire 5eraph's update pack thread, and some other things. So that the updates are locked as tight as possible. If i may say so.

I am currently running with 5eraph's update pack, wmp11 hot all them hotfixes, ie7+3updates, and 43 general kb's not found in 5er'pack. And lots more stuff. Install went flawlessly, tho there were some odd problems, i'm blaming an aging nlite for it/hardware memory fault during compiling iso or such.

I'm thinking of putting up my install scheme if there's any interest, but it would one very long post. Indeed.

Loving it 5eraph! =)

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:33 pm

Great work, man. I'd surely be interested in your scheme for it, except for the inclusion of IE7 (or any parts thereof) and Outlook Express (or any parts thereof) and Malicious Software removal tool (or any parts thereof).
It seems those can't properly be excluded by nLite.

In fact, 5eraph's pack is the way I prefer it. He's made some exclusions that are really useful for my target-image.

IE8 RTS will be released March 16th anyway, so who will need the IE7 core after that? I won't be needing IE8 anyway, because personally I prefer Firefox, Google Chrome and Safari (the Windows port is quite good and stable actually!).

RickSteele
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:32 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Post by RickSteele » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:10 pm

I'm thinking of putting up my install scheme if there's any interest,

I will test anything you or 5eraph put up-realtime install (I use Terabyte!!);

but it would one very long post. Indeed.

like you said, "lovin' it"; the kind of dedication you put into this, testing/feedback is the very least we can do.

I think nuhi is concentrating on his life and, possibly, university-finals coming up soon. God knows, he has, along with all the coders extrordinaire, spent more than enough time giving; you are all very special people, a lot of time and effort for the satisfaction in accomplishment.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:59 pm

Well, thank you guys, kinda left me speechless there. I'm not used to such kind words so..

(Nuhi will be back i hope of course, though i fear the endless ongoing queue of people asking same questions never using a search function, may not be so tempting to return to anyway.)

At current time, I would like to see a discussion, or idea, where to go next.

I am then thinking especially for what's not in 5eraph's pack, and how we can possibly make lists and such BETTER.

deleted 20 lines of rant.

My install does a lot of fixing of wrong paths, removing references to files non existant in install - in registry, and such. As shown in http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6707 as well as i've collected a lot of different things that nlite can't do for me or does wrong which i fix, but tbh, i dont know what to do, i would like to put my findings and work out there, so it's not just lost. I'm sure someone might work upon it or so. I just dont know how to properly do that, simply because it's just so much. Well it's getting awfully late. Some sleep and try and think clear headed about this a day soon. Maybe just starth with very little and go from there.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:58 pm

Note, Post #1 updated. History post not updated. Thinking of scrapping it.


*** http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960228
*** KB958690 replaces KB960228 (5.2.3790.4415)
win32k.sys 5.2.3790.4456 Multi-User Win32 Driver


*** http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960225
*** KB960225 update over SP2
ksecdd.sys 5.2.3790.4458 Kernel Security Support Provider Interface - NEW Update over SP2
schannel.dll 5.2.3790.4458 TLS / SSL Security Provider (+ x86 file=same version)


I see a WINDOWSSERVER2003.WINDOWSXP-KB938464-V2-X64-ENU.EXE
was released in the latest MS month pack for security fixes. I am noting that i am now using 5eraphs pack and the gdiplus.dll file still exists in version 3959 and the latest one in the pack.

I am once again raising an eyebrow why that is the case, and also why MS also didnt just release a KB that if so resolves the issue of having several gdiplus.dll files, unless truly the meaning is that there are supposed to be several versions of the file, as to serve as different libraries for compability or otherwise.


I got an install error while trying to run the KB, gonna check a few things ...
*** http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961063
security update for DNS server: March 10, 2009
KB 961063 completely replaces old KB953419 and KB958752
*** w03a3409.dll 5.2.3790.4430 Service Pack Messages

Yeah i got problems with this one.

This KB will most likely fail to install because of required DNS required for install, how annoying =( Help?

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:11 pm

TranceEnergy wrote:already in 5eraph's pack (i think)


http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950224 replaces KB942088
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952206 replaces KB955455
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961160 replaces KB940925
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940349 replaces KB933653
Correct. They are included.
TranceEnergy wrote:The list of "files not in" _is_ complete however.

[...]

Files not in 5eraph's pack that can be directly integrated.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/919241
contains newer files then 5eraphs february pack.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930499
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933071
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/937549
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940569
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943172
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943509
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/944829
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/945778
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946118
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946198
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946504
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946517
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946633
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946813
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947354
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947870
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948704
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949729
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950037
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950426
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950676
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951347
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951851
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952943
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953176
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953675
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954057
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954091
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955843
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957052
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957089
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957492
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957585
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958147
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958353
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961118
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961799
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/965230
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967663


Files not in 5eraph's pack that are run from svcpack (not directly integrated)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941560
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956826
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959202

[...]

941560, 956826, 959202 that are run from svcpack, it would be nice to see them in 5eraph's pack or perhaps removed for other reasons.
I managed to get all of the updates listed above into the current update pack (2009-03_1) except those highlighted in red:
  • KB956826 - No files are installed when applying this update to XP x64. DSAdmin.dll does not exist in my source and does not appear anywhere in TxtSetup.sif or DOSNet.inf. Despite what the KB article states, this update is not for XP x64.

    KB961118 - This must be installed after .NET 3.5 SP1. This update only consists of a catalog file.
TranceEnergy wrote:I got an install error while trying to run the KB, gonna check a few things ...
*** http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961063
security update for DNS server: March 10, 2009
KB 961063 completely replaces old KB953419 and KB958752
*** w03a3409.dll 5.2.3790.4430 Service Pack Messages

Yeah i got problems with this one.

This KB will most likely fail to install because of required DNS required for install, how annoying =( Help?
Actually, the installer checks for a registry entry that you can install with the following REG code. Add the registry entry and you're golden. ;)

Code: Select all

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup\OC Manager\Subcomponents]
"dns"=dword:00000001

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:37 pm

Speechless...................................................................................................



HOW FUCKING AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sorry, but oooooooommmmmmffffffggggggggg............

It's very late over here, ill write a proper response later.

I never had expected this 5eraph, holy shit man... Good job indeed!

I've updated list with your findings/awesome fast update!. This makes me want to go hunt for more updates, lol =)
I have gone through the march update pack, and checked out every KB i had that was not in the pack, and checked out the list, twice. It's now 100% only that security catalog file for .dot net needed it seems. Checked over this page #2 here, and yep, Houston, we're ready for install.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:20 pm

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967587
sens.dll 5.2.3790.4466 System Event Notification Service (SENS)

Update over SP2

User avatar
Passion
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Meow Bay

Post by Passion » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:35 am

TranceEnergy wrote:http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967587
sens.dll 5.2.3790.4466 System Event Notification Service (SENS)

Update over SP2
This one errors out for XP x64. Probably Server 2003 or 32 bit only..

Which reminds me;

Can someone with a fresh all up to date XP Pro x64 Edition SP2+ (so not 2003 server) make a registry export of this entire key for me?

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\COM3

My current updated XP64 has troubles when I run the Component Services GUI, and I wonder if it's my copy or just common for XP x64... either way, I wonder what the COM3 registry entries *should* look like for Component Services not to be so buggy..

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:00 pm

kb967587 installs just fine here. Why not grab the key from a vmware install?

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:52 am

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956594
KB replaces KB948704
http.sys HTTP Protocol Stack 5.2.3790.4350

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967327
volsnap.sys Volume Shadow Copy Driver 5.2.3790.4465

antoineL
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:10 am
Location: España

Post by antoineL » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:27 pm

5eraph wrote:
TranceEnergy wrote:Files not in 5eraph's pack that are run from svcpack (not directly integrated)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941560
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956826
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959202
[...]
941560, 956826, 959202 that are run from svcpack, it would be nice to see them in 5eraph's pack or perhaps removed for other reasons.
I managed to get all of the updates listed above into the current update pack (2009-03_1) except those highlighted in red:
  • KB956826 - No files are installed when applying this update to XP x64. DSAdmin.dll does not exist in my source and does not appear anywhere in TxtSetup.sif or DOSNet.inf. Despite what the KB article states, this update is not for XP x64.
Well, this file is actually somewhere on the raw source: it is stored inside the Cabinet which is inside i386/WADMINPAK.MSI!!! :twisted:
And it should be obvious at this point for our readers that it would get installed on the target computer whenever the Administration pack is installed (which does not occur for "normal" home users, only when you are administrating a domain.)

Of course, now the question is, why does MS indicates this update when you are running XP64, but does not when you are running XP32 (or 2000)? Since of course, the same DSAdmin.dll is present inside the AdminPak.msi... I wondered perhaps this is because of the different behaviour of the bug (see the KB article.)
5eraph wrote:
  • Despite what the KB article states, this update is not for XP x64.
Yeh! In fact, the behaviour when this hotfix is installed on XP64, even with the administation tools installed, is to... do essentially nothing (carrefully read the update_SPxQFE.inf leads to the same conclusion.) Despite the fact that the bug really exists in the shipped DSAdmin.dll, and the hotfix really corrects the bug.

So it is fully clear this is yet another glitch in the present KB redaction, and I am merely writing this:
  • - to the enlightment of the future generations 8)
    - in the hope some KB redactor picks it up and correct the stuff :?:
    - in the remote hope that MS issues an hotfix which corrects the bug even on the remote administration workstations :?: / :evil:

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:40 pm

Thanks for double-checking, antoineL. I wasn't aware the file existed in an MSI. :)

Unfortunately, I don't have the tools to repackage MSIs; so there's nothing I can do about that file.

BTW, welcome to the forum!

RickSteele
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:32 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Post by RickSteele » Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:01 am

Hey Trance, you OK?; have not heard from you for a while and am concerned; this KB endeavor is very exhausting to say the least -even if it is a labor of "love" so to speak.
Please do not feel we do not want to hear from you simply because you have grown too busy or tired to continue with this-drop in to input your valueable advice or just to say "hey"; we need to know you're alright.

User avatar
TranceEnergy
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Post by TranceEnergy » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:47 pm

The thing is real life has cought up with me for the time being. I am however just fine. I'm in a transitional period, where i am about to move but circumstances are unknown. It's a long story, but something i just have to go through. I can explain it in two words: Tough love. =)

As it is, i feel i got through what i started to do , to get focus on updating everything that is part of the native xp x64 install media with service pack 2 included. To share the idea that, if you first of have all files on your system, why not update it.

And you see, in the end here, when a while back 5eraph got the 40 remaining fixes etc into update pack, i realized there was simply stuff i could not achieve in the same way by just installing hotfixes manually. All tough recent update packs has made me miss the control, i dont like extra's =(

I have put more energy into tweaking instead.
To fix what nlite cannot tweak or doesnt remove properly, or any behaviour/action that i find to be incorrect/not optimal. Not only that but also new removals for stuff nlite has no option to remove, and further more files that nlite does remove parts of, but not entirely, which i have found can indeed be removed.

When i get things straightened out, and I feel i can take on the just about daily updating again, i'll be here.

If nuhi come back i'll try to summarize it all, should have enough to bring it to version 2, at least for xp x64.

RickSteele
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:32 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Post by RickSteele » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:30 am

take care and luck.

Post Reply