XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 20180109
- =[FEAR]=JIGSAW
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:54 am
- Location: Cape Town, South Africa
- vioplujjnsjzfg
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
Thats the price we/you pay for prompt updating of updatepacks...most updatepack makers did not know of this update until after 5eraph published his packvioplujjnsjzfg wrote:Thanks for the update.
Onepiece has Microsoft Windows Update at v7.4.7600.229 while yours is at 7.4.7600.226.
I missed it too in my spanish pack, my users will have to wait for next month
Rick is right. It was missed by most because Microsoft labeled it as an update for server OSes, which I check because XP x64 shares the 2003 SP1 codebase.
Similarly, I initially missed KB982375 for my IE8 addon because I didn't check ricktendo64's pack before releasing the addon and Microsoft doesn't have an article for the update yet.
Similarly, I initially missed KB982375 for my IE8 addon because I didn't check ricktendo64's pack before releasing the addon and Microsoft doesn't have an article for the update yet.

- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
Yes, so does anyone remember this?
http://wiki.ryanvm.net/
It seems broken now, or we can use it as a co-composing system.
http://wiki.ryanvm.net/
It seems broken now, or we can use it as a co-composing system.
Sounds good, Rick.
I forgot about that, yumeyao.
I was thinking more along the lines of reviving or starting a fresh Hotfix Hunt thread.
I forgot about that, yumeyao.

I was thinking more along the lines of reviving or starting a fresh Hotfix Hunt thread.
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- alsyundawy
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:47 pm
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- vioplujjnsjzfg
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm
I'm sure you're already aware, but just in case: New critical update out today.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
vioplujjnsjzfg wrote:I'm sure you're already aware, but just in case: New critical update out today.
actually just got in. i'll be updating the pack shortly.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
thankyou u_h
anybody could tell me why is "rundll32.exe" visible at processes's list in task manger, although I do not open anything...such as "Accessibility Options" or "Mouse" for example, in Control Panel ?
I know that sometimes it is related to infections...scanned, monitored it and there is no infections ... I recognize all the processes in task manager at sight... and I know it wasn't there after a simple windows start... and does not stay even if becomes used by some application.
so what calls it ? I reinstalled xp , I've installed w7 also, and it keeps showing there , the curious thing is that it's size does not modify and it lets me remove it very easy whenever I want... still bothered why keeps showing, could it be requested and used from the outside, such as a network ?
could be a recent piece of software that changed it's policy after a recent update ?
I only updated SPTD, utorrent and java
also a website that i use it frequently could it be responsible for appealing it ? a script embedded in a site structure could do anything
anybody could tell me why is "rundll32.exe" visible at processes's list in task manger, although I do not open anything...such as "Accessibility Options" or "Mouse" for example, in Control Panel ?

I know that sometimes it is related to infections...scanned, monitored it and there is no infections ... I recognize all the processes in task manager at sight... and I know it wasn't there after a simple windows start... and does not stay even if becomes used by some application.
so what calls it ? I reinstalled xp , I've installed w7 also, and it keeps showing there , the curious thing is that it's size does not modify and it lets me remove it very easy whenever I want... still bothered why keeps showing, could it be requested and used from the outside, such as a network ?

could be a recent piece of software that changed it's policy after a recent update ?
I only updated SPTD, utorrent and java

also a website that i use it frequently could it be responsible for appealing it ? a script embedded in a site structure could do anything

- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
Could be a drivervodacuza wrote:thankyou u_h
anybody could tell me why is "rundll32.exe" visible at processes's list in task manger, although I do not open anything...such as "Accessibility Options" or "Mouse" for example, in Control Panel ?![]()
I know that sometimes it is related to infections...scanned, monitored it and there is no infections ... I recognize all the processes in task manager at sight... and I know it wasn't there after a simple windows start... and does not stay even if becomes used by some application.
so what calls it ? I reinstalled xp , I've installed w7 also, and it keeps showing there , the curious thing is that it's size does not modify and it lets me remove it very easy whenever I want... still bothered why keeps showing, could it be requested and used from the outside, such as a network ?
could be a recent piece of software that changed it's policy after a recent update ?
I only updated SPTD, utorrent and java
also a website that i use it frequently could it be responsible for appealing it ? a script embedded in a site structure could do anything
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
Going to test by my usual ways, i find that , almost at first boot, system is verry iresponsive.
Looking at processes i find that windows automatic update client wuauclt.exe and one another
svchost.exe process keep cpu and memory usage up to 100%.
setuperr.log and Event Viewer show no errors.
After doing the ie8 update, at next boot, at short time, system become again busy.
After shutting down the Automatic Updates and BITS services and restarting the computer works just fine.
Also tested twice to be shure. used MSDN SP3, QFE 1.36 and nLite.
Just direct integration for QFE 1.3.6 (Integrate > Hotfixes...)and Bootable iso, not touched anything else,
so, is not one nlite issue.
KB2286198 are shitty ? because i have used same scenario like at 1.34 update pack, and all other previous updatepacks.
I don't know if setuperr.log touched anything elese than shell32.dll, but i will investigate right now.
Looking at processes i find that windows automatic update client wuauclt.exe and one another
svchost.exe process keep cpu and memory usage up to 100%.
setuperr.log and Event Viewer show no errors.
After doing the ie8 update, at next boot, at short time, system become again busy.
After shutting down the Automatic Updates and BITS services and restarting the computer works just fine.
Also tested twice to be shure. used MSDN SP3, QFE 1.36 and nLite.
Just direct integration for QFE 1.3.6 (Integrate > Hotfixes...)and Bootable iso, not touched anything else,
so, is not one nlite issue.
KB2286198 are shitty ? because i have used same scenario like at 1.34 update pack, and all other previous updatepacks.
I don't know if setuperr.log touched anything elese than shell32.dll, but i will investigate right now.
Last edited by vmanda on Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
ooo, I think it happens only at the first booting time, and it happens so because the system expects to interact with you and tries the usual updating procedure... Do you keep OOBE ? Cause I do and encountered a similar problem ... to solve which I had to set 3 services, within nlite, on Automatic instead of Default:
- Automatic Updates
- Error Reporting Service
- Event Log
it is a kind of a silent crash due to the fact that we disable automatic updates, error reporting, event log and even if we do not keep OOBE but more if we do... system keeps searching to find a connection and retrive updates...it's MS policy after office, IE, all their stuff...
so I had it too and was expecting like 40 seconds just to be able to press the Skipp button and pass over net detection in OOBE. I mention that I keep OOBE because it is a natural way to choose a variable yet personalized user name...BUT I also disable error reporting, automatic updates, and a part of event log because I am mad to do anything to have a flying OS
)
- Automatic Updates
- Error Reporting Service
- Event Log
it is a kind of a silent crash due to the fact that we disable automatic updates, error reporting, event log and even if we do not keep OOBE but more if we do... system keeps searching to find a connection and retrive updates...it's MS policy after office, IE, all their stuff...
so I had it too and was expecting like 40 seconds just to be able to press the Skipp button and pass over net detection in OOBE. I mention that I keep OOBE because it is a natural way to choose a variable yet personalized user name...BUT I also disable error reporting, automatic updates, and a part of event log because I am mad to do anything to have a flying OS

- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
are you saying that KB2286198 is causing a system slowdown at first boot?vmanda wrote:KB2286198 are shitty ? because i have used same scenario like at 1.34 update pack, and all other previous updatepacks.
I don't know if setuperr.log touched anything elese than shell32.dll, but i will investigate right now.
i have not experienced that but would love if anyone else has the same report or any other update pack makers have same from their users.
@user_hidden
I'm not shure by that. If you do not touched anything else than
adding the KB2286198 when updated from 1.34 to 1.36,
i suspect KB2286198 as culprit.
@vodacuza
Do you have read my post? I have not touched anything !
EDIT: i'm going to integrate ie8 and wmp 11, to test what happens after that.
I'm not shure by that. If you do not touched anything else than
adding the KB2286198 when updated from 1.34 to 1.36,
i suspect KB2286198 as culprit.
@vodacuza
Do you have read my post? I have not touched anything !
EDIT: i'm going to integrate ie8 and wmp 11, to test what happens after that.
Last edited by vmanda on Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:14 am, edited 7 times in total.
did you follow the same sequence as you allways use or used something new ?EneergE wrote:Experiencing some issues with this and the onepiece IE8 addon. No IE exists after install and several popups about files missing after logon.
Several missing files.
some newly untested addons might conflict others...by rewritting inf, ini files or keeping busy resources instead of releasing them after they install
what is sure is that it was blocked to install, might have a surprise to work well if you renounce at all net frame addons...just a guess, net frame is a pain to MS itself... I do not use it as addonEneergE wrote:QFE Update Pack -> .NET 2-3.5 -> .net 4.0 -> Onepiece IE8...
I'm still testing. It may actually be one of the .net packages, but the reason why I believe it is the IE8 package was because IE is missing after install.
