XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 20180109
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
I build it from the registry of a clean running system. It seems 5eraph and myself use the same methodology.SHO_GuN wrote:I am curious ... where do you get the data in your tzupdate.inf?
I can't seem to find matching data in KB2633952.
For example, line 14 contains "Kabul" - I can't find that anywhere in KB2633952.
Thanks
The tzupdate.inf is a complete timezone data while the KB only has the updated data.
Yep. Same method. Slightly different implementation when building the actual INF.
My INF only includes the changes between the original registry entries and the latest time zone update as found by differencing the exported "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Time Zones" key with code65536's diff.exe, so it's smaller despite following gosh's rigid text-mode INF rules (specifically, always using 8-digit data type IDs with Reg2Inf's /longflags).
I know for certain that US English XPx86, XPx64 and 2003x64 share nearly identical time zone registry entries (the only difference between x86 and x64 being the MapID for Tasmania Standard Time, "20,-1" vs. "20,65") . If one wanted they should be able to swap our time zone update INFs and achieve the same result.
EDIT: A working script has been posted for those interested.
My INF only includes the changes between the original registry entries and the latest time zone update as found by differencing the exported "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Time Zones" key with code65536's diff.exe, so it's smaller despite following gosh's rigid text-mode INF rules (specifically, always using 8-digit data type IDs with Reg2Inf's /longflags).
I know for certain that US English XPx86, XPx64 and 2003x64 share nearly identical time zone registry entries (the only difference between x86 and x64 being the MapID for Tasmania Standard Time, "20,-1" vs. "20,65") . If one wanted they should be able to swap our time zone update INFs and achieve the same result.
EDIT: A working script has been posted for those interested.
Last edited by 5eraph on Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
I'm getting an error with 201111213, using the same addons I used with 20111110 which didn't give this error.
qfecheck,
Related error in setuperr.log.
From the update pack details:
KB2264107 - This update helps protect against DLL preloading vulnerabilities in software applications on the Windows platform.
Any ideas? Is it on my end?
qfecheck,
Code: Select all
KB2264107: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
The following files are not valid in the system catalog:
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\NTDLL.DLL
From the update pack details:
KB2264107 - This update helps protect against DLL preloading vulnerabilities in software applications on the Windows platform.
Any ideas? Is it on my end?
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
all fine here !shiner wrote:I'm getting an error with 201111213, using the same addons I used with 20111110 which didn't give this error.
Any ideas? Is it on my end?
maybe a bad integration?
here is the info on the file in the update pack:
File: ntdll.dll version 5.1.2600.6055
CRC-32: 1684124f
MD4: 6f85e2860b25b78808c16023c722b541
MD5: 15ce4dbc22fab90b3ca5352af1fff81c
SHA-1: bf3d9f67b968755a2d0659540a1d115e0525f02b
u_h, I don't know what to say.
I now have 3 vms using 20111213 and all give the same error above on ntdll.dll. The hashes of ntdll.dll in those VMs all match the hashes you posted. My latest integration included only your pack, nothing else.
Any suggestions? Is there any information I can give you?
I now have 3 vms using 20111213 and all give the same error above on ntdll.dll. The hashes of ntdll.dll in those VMs all match the hashes you posted. My latest integration included only your pack, nothing else.
Any suggestions? Is there any information I can give you?
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
shiner wrote:u_h, I don't know what to say.
I now have 3 vms using 20111213 and all give the same error above on ntdll.dll. The hashes of ntdll.dll in those VMs all match the hashes you posted. My latest integration included only your pack, nothing else.
Any suggestions? Is there any information I can give you?
Lemme check into it more and get back to you.....
I'm prepping a rebuild with a fix and I'll PM you with a link to test.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
I don't know if there are any side effects from the way u_h and 5eraph are handling time zone updates - but I haven't encountered any.ricktendo64 wrote:I still prefer to use tzchange.exe
However, there is at least one minor problem using tzchange.exe, at least under certain conditions. If you use winnt.sif to set your time zone and do an install between the old time shift date and the new time shift date, the system time will be thrown off by one hour. It works fine for the rest of the year.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
That's the problem Kurt_Aust described to me back in October 2009, after my hiatus. It wasn't until a month later (XPx64 pack 2009-11_2) that I realized it was necessary to add the changes before the relevant entries in WinNT.sif were parsed.
SHO_GuN stumbled upon the same problem a few months after that, which prompted user_hidden to use a similar method.
SHO_GuN stumbled upon the same problem a few months after that, which prompted user_hidden to use a similar method.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
I'm almost sure it's not related to this pack, but for now about 3 months (i build a new cd with almost each update, adn reinstall), my explorer icons often revert to TILE view (I only use LIST view).
Ive unchecked "remember each folder settings", and Ive "applied to all folders". It always worked that way.
It seems to happen randomly.
This is really really annoying
Thanks
Ive unchecked "remember each folder settings", and Ive "applied to all folders". It always worked that way.
It seems to happen randomly.
This is really really annoying

Thanks
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
geoslake wrote:I'm almost sure it's not related to this pack, but for now about 3 months (i build a new cd with almost each update, adn reinstall), my explorer icons often revert to TILE view (I only use LIST view).
Ive unchecked "remember each folder settings", and Ive "applied to all folders". It always worked that way.
It seems to happen randomly.
This is really really annoying
Thanks
not pack related at all.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
20120110
updated Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool v4.4.5802
added KB2584146
added KB2584577 replaced KB2506212
added KB2585542 replaced KB971737 & KB2541763
added KB2598479
added KB2603381
added KB2629462 replaced KB956625
added KB2631813 replaced KB2282612
added KB2646524 replaced KB2567680
updated Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool v4.4.5802
added KB2584146
added KB2584577 replaced KB2506212
added KB2585542 replaced KB971737 & KB2541763
added KB2598479
added KB2603381
added KB2629462 replaced KB956625
added KB2631813 replaced KB2282612
added KB2646524 replaced KB2567680
- vioplujjnsjzfg
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
both user_hidden and onepiece do a great job releasing regular (monthly) xp update packs
you can add this update pack and its brings the security patches / other bugs fixes up to date for a std win xp build (with a few extras, see front page u/h gives all the info)
as a next step u can add the parts rick suggests to you new build, search these for addons to build your own customised disc here:
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=14
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=7
or onepiece makes an all in one update pack here
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6438

you can add this update pack and its brings the security patches / other bugs fixes up to date for a std win xp build (with a few extras, see front page u/h gives all the info)
as a next step u can add the parts rick suggests to you new build, search these for addons to build your own customised disc here:
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=14
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=7
or onepiece makes an all in one update pack here
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6438
yes u_h makes a great job making this pack as it is...and having to resist to himself and to others not to force integration of ie8, wmp11, dx, .net and so on...as a matter of fact there is a pack on xable net that has 27 megabytes... and consists only of high priority updates...to me both packs are great, depending on what do you want to attain 

- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
lejedeag's conversation has been moved since it has nothing to do with this topic.
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9504
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9504
- vioplujjnsjzfg
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm
Your IE8 AddOn is not updated!? Try again with this one:
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5999
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5999
- vioplujjnsjzfg
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm
Yep. That's the one I used - working fine now. I don't know how I missed it earlier.phox wrote:Your IE8 AddOn is not updated!? Try again with this one:
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5999
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:17 am
What is the file's version number, mutedchild? The file in I386 should be 5.1.2600.6055. It is the proper version number in both user_hidden's pack 20120110 and OnePiece's pack 5.4.0.
The file in I386\SYSTEM32 should not need updating, and neither x86 pack does so. You can try updating it yourself and see if it works.
The file in I386\SYSTEM32 should not need updating, and neither x86 pack does so. You can try updating it yourself and see if it works.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:17 am
the file version is 5.1.2600.5512. Actually, i tested my compiled iso on virtualbox before burning it and it doesnt give me that error message but when i burn it and try the actual disc it the error message pops up. Thats why i check the ntdll.dll found out that its different from u_h pack.
EDIT: sorry u_h, i never thought there are 2 ntdll.dll in my source. Thank you user_hidden and 5eraph.
EDIT: sorry u_h, i never thought there are 2 ntdll.dll in my source. Thank you user_hidden and 5eraph.
i got this version modded on a cd
http://www.mediafire.com/?khoa61ytt19d5ao
can I use the latest update pack to overwrite the existing one
http://www.mediafire.com/?khoa61ytt19d5ao
can I use the latest update pack to overwrite the existing one
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
ENU_user wrote:i got this version modded on a cd
http://www.mediafire.com/?khoa61ytt19d5ao
can I use the latest update pack to overwrite the existing one
i didn't check your file but if it is older than what is in the updatepack
it will be overwritten.
yours and xable update packs work very well for me..
im using a untouched xp pro sp3 student edition
thanks user_hidden for keeping this update pack alive and updated monthly
your also so quick at releasing your update packs so soon after the hotfixes are out..
do u know where i can get a dot net framework aio 1.1 - 4.0 addon
that installs before t13 or as close to the start of t13
ive got a aio framework 2.0 - 4.0 addon that installs after first boot,
but would rather have framework thats installed before my silent addons install
at t13 as ive got a silent install of WLMessenger 14.0.8117.416 that needs framework at t13 for wlm to install properly..
i am already using your Microsoft .NET Framework AIO ROE x86
would you think by adding your other addon aswell Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 may fix the problem..
as i dont know what framework WLMessenger needs to be able to install
thanks in advance for your relpy
im using a untouched xp pro sp3 student edition

thanks user_hidden for keeping this update pack alive and updated monthly
your also so quick at releasing your update packs so soon after the hotfixes are out..

do u know where i can get a dot net framework aio 1.1 - 4.0 addon
that installs before t13 or as close to the start of t13
ive got a aio framework 2.0 - 4.0 addon that installs after first boot,

but would rather have framework thats installed before my silent addons install
at t13 as ive got a silent install of WLMessenger 14.0.8117.416 that needs framework at t13 for wlm to install properly..
i am already using your Microsoft .NET Framework AIO ROE x86
would you think by adding your other addon aswell Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 may fix the problem..
as i dont know what framework WLMessenger needs to be able to install
thanks in advance for your relpy
Last edited by dudeuk on Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- laddanator
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:26 pm
- Location: virginia