[Addon] Microsoft .NET Framework Family 3.5 SP1 - 20131008

yumeyao · Post by **yumeyao** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:59 am

Because when you install .NET the 'offcial' way, the registry entries are 'carefully' organized by Windows Installer(Although Windows Installer & such careful way are totally bull-shit). But when you install installers made by u_h or me, all(u_h's)/some of(mine) registry entries needed to satisfy Windows Update are written 'rudely'.

Post by **user_hidden** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 8:56 am

Outbreaker wrote:Yep that's what i try to say. The computer without the .NET update pack where updated with a problem but the computer with the .NET update pack are repeatedly installing the KB951847 at every computer restart.

why not just deny and block it to not prompt again in mean time ?

Outbreaker · Post by **Outbreaker** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:56 am

@yumeyao
Ahh yumeyao was not abducted by Aliens.

Thanks for the information hopefully someone finds a way to avoid this problem.

@user_hidden
To do that on over 20 computers every time a .NET update comes out mmm.

For now i will add a script for installing the .NET stuff over the Windows Auto Update Center.

yumeyao · Post by **yumeyao** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:03 pm

I'm not sure if there's someone using my .NET addon encounters such issues, at least it still works fine for me and my friends(I have several installations on my and my friends' computers of different versions of my addon).

Post by **user_hidden** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:06 pm

there have not been any problems up until the current updates.
it was the current ones that wiped the old reg data instead of adding to it thus prompting
for an update that had already been installed.
imho a MS snafu ....

yumeyao · Post by **yumeyao** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:16 pm

Shit...
http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/154928- ... installed/

Any one volunteer to go a test?

Post by **user_hidden** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:35 am

yumeyao wrote:Sh!t...

so I guess it is a WU/MU issue ?
bad coding on the release of the updates....

Outbreaker · Post by **Outbreaker** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:19 pm

@user_hidden
I use the current .NET update pack 'Addon_Microsoft.Net_AIO_ROE_20111011.7z' after everything is installed Winodws Update Center promotes me to install the .NET Dezember updates. After i installed the .NET Dezember updates and restart my computer the Windows Update Center is promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update i install it too but everytime i restart my computer it will promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update.

HADEE_16 · Post by **HADEE_16** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:24 pm

Why dont update this pack

Please update and release new version

Thanks

Mike84 · Post by **Mike84** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:31 pm

I can confirm the problem Outbreaker posted.

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:33 pm

HADEE_16 wrote:Why dont update this pack

Please update and release new version

Thanks

UMMM Because it is a holiday season and we all have shit to do???

HAVE SOME PATIENCE!

ricktendo64 · Post by **ricktendo64** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:16 pm

HADEE_16 wrote:Why dont update this pack

Please update and release new version

Thanks

Five years and not so much as one "thank you"

Post by **user_hidden** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:29 pm

Outbreaker wrote:@user_hidden
I use the current .NET update pack 'Addon_Microsoft.Net_AIO_ROE_20111011.7z' after everything is installed Winodws Update Center promotes me to install the .NET Dezember updates. After i installed the .NET Dezember updates and restart my computer the Windows Update Center is promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update i install it too but everytime i restart my computer it will promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update.

I already explained that you should unpack the installer and apply the MUREGFIX.reg file and you will be fine.

Post by **user_hidden** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:32 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote: UMMM Because it is a holiday season and we all have shit to do???

HAVE SOME PATIENCE!

funny how it came from a 1 post wonder !

Post by **user_hidden** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:33 pm

ricktendo64 wrote:Five years and not so much as one "thank you"

hmmm, maybe i should just quit ?

Post by **user_hidden** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:13 pm

updated 20120101 ....

Outbreaker · Post by **Outbreaker** » Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:30 pm

user_hidden wrote:@user_hidden
I already explained that you should unpack the installer and apply the MUREGFIX.reg file and you will be fine.

Yes ture but was this a .NET update pack problem and could this happen again in the future with the new version if some .NET updates come out?

user_hidden wrote:
ricktendo64 wrote:Five years and not so much as one "thank you"
hmmm, maybe i should just quit ?

Ahh a forum full of thank posts would be annoying. Adding a 'Thank You' button in the forum would be nice.

Post by **user_hidden** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:05 am

Outbreaker wrote:Yes ture but was this a .NET update pack problem and could this happen again in the future with the new version if some .NET updates come out?

Ahh a forum full of thank posts would be annoying. Adding a 'Thank You' button in the forum would be nice.

Can never tell the future with Microsoft.
They play games and are not very efficient.
So I can not guarantee what may happen.

As for a "Thank You" button that would be a nice addition to the
forum but that is up to RyanVM and it would probably entail a
forum software update.

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:47 pm

Actually thepoint of thank you doesn't REALLY apply to that poster it was the tone and impatience of the post.

Especially for a 5year old only one poster....

While I don't use this addon I can admire the WORK that is entailed in making it...

ricktendo64 · Post by **ricktendo64** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:31 pm

Dont hold your breath for RVM to update his forum software

And yes I was! talking about the (1 time) poster, been nothing but a leech for 5 years without a single thank you post and expect others to be his addon slave and update stuff right away

mr_smartepants · Post by **mr_smartepants** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:47 pm

Well I for one can't say "thank you" enough!

RicaNeaga · Post by **RicaNeaga** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:16 pm

So this installs at T-13 or at first logon? I want to install it before ricktendo's .net 4 pack, but I can only make his a SVCPack .net4 addon, so a T-13 installer.

Post by **user_hidden** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:10 pm

RicaNeaga wrote:So this installs at T-13 or at first logon? I want to install it before ricktendo's .net 4 pack, but I can only make his a SVCPack .net4 addon, so a T-13 installer.

it installs from RunOnceEX not Svcpack/T13

RicaNeaga · Post by **RicaNeaga** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:51 pm

Is asking too much of you to make also a (silent) .exe installer for this .net2.0-3.5 pack, so I can make it afterwards a svcpack (for it to be installed before ricktendo's .net4 addon during windows installation)? Your .net 1.1 is also a svcpack addon... Thanks

Post by **user_hidden** » Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:40 am

RicaNeaga wrote:Is asking too much of you to make also a (silent) .exe installer for this .net2.0-3.5 pack, so I can make it afterwards a svcpack (for it to be installed before ricktendo's .net4 addon during windows installation)? Your .net 1.1 is also a svcpack addon... Thanks

you could unpack the addon to get access to the net35.ex_.
with 7zip unpack the net35.ex_ to get net35.exe.
run the exe with the "-ai" switch for silent install.

i can not guarantee this will install properly at T13 as like i said
it is designed for runonce.

RicaNeaga · Post by **RicaNeaga** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:08 am

I can confirm that it DOESN'T work as a SVCPACK addon, only the .net 2.0 gets installed, .30 & 3.5 doesn't. Pity.

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:32 pm

updated 20120214

adric · Post by **adric** » Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:12 pm

I just tried to update a previously installed .NET (20110101) with your new switchless installer on XP and I do not see any reg entries for KB263380. WU still offers it as an update for .NET20 SP2. This is all that I see:

Code: Select all

HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\A1FD99AC6E368ED3F88C973462E5D9BB	DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3	REG_SZ	02:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{C09FB3CD-3D0C-3F2D-899A-6A1D67F2073F}.KB2633880\	2/4/2012 18:59:06 	106	
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3\Features	KB2633880	REG_SZ	6_vYTP70g5[_0YTmFIM&K7FnbX^[_3rnZVS23R6`,0p,jCK9u79jFc9[=LAeK91^9dpOO3olHGfebx5*Servicing_Key	2/4/2012 18:59:31 	95	
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3\Patches\0349BE9150117953E80C5ED001CB3F38	DisplayName	REG_SZ	KB2633880	2/16/2012 17:45:03 	10	
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{C09FB3CD-3D0C-3F2D-899A-6A1D67F2073F}.KB2633880		REG_SZ	KB2633880	2/4/2012 18:59:15 	10	
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\Installer\Features\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3	KB2633880	REG_SZ	Servicing_Key	2/4/2012 18:59:31 	14	
HKCR\Installer\Features\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3	KB2633880	REG_SZ	Servicing_Key	2/4/2012 18:59:31 	14

Is this supposed to work or do I need to install when there's no .Net present on the system?

Al

Post by **user_hidden** » Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:28 pm

adric wrote:Is this supposed to work or do I need to install when there's no .Net present on the system?

Al

yup clean install

marzsyndrome · Post by **marzsyndrome** » Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:09 pm

How difficult would it actually be for one to alter the installation script/method so as to make it useable with SVCPACK?

I'm aiming to get all the .NETs installed during GUI Setup and am hoping to find a way to achieve this while still using Ricktendo64's Slim installer for .NET 4.

I mean, I still have a copy of YumeYao's last svcpack-worthy CAB for .NET 3.5 but it would be nice to not have to worry about updating it through MU/WU afterwards.

kolp · Post by **kolp** » Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:09 am

user_hidden, great work as always!

Anywhere I can find a win xp64 net addon?

marzsyndrome · Post by **marzsyndrome** » Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:18 am

Hey user_hidden, are you still able to respond to my previous post sometime?

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:29 am

marzsyndrome wrote:Hey user_hidden, are you still able to respond to my previous post sometime?

sorry about that....

no plans to make the installer run at svcpack at the moment.

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:20 pm

updated 20120410 ....

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue May 08, 2012 7:10 pm

updated 20120508

Eureka · Post by **Eureka** » Wed May 09, 2012 3:57 am

update so quickly, thanks to user_hidden !!!

adric · Post by **adric** » Tue May 22, 2012 6:07 am

Anyone know why KB2518864, KB2572073 and KB2633880 have started to appear in Windows Update?

These KBs were replaced by KB2604092 (MS12-035) which is in the current addon/switchless.

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue May 22, 2012 7:16 am

adric wrote:Anyone know why KB2518864, KB2572073 and KB2633880 have started to appear in Windows Update?

These KBs were replaced by KB2604092 (MS12-035) which is in the current addon/switchless.

i have no clue....seems MU is in a screwup mode today !
will check into it but why all of a suddon these old replaced
KB's are being pushed.....

let ya know later today.

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue May 22, 2012 7:38 am

@ Adric

by chance do you have archived my installer before the current one?
if so is it possible for you to upload it and pm me a link.

if you don't no problem but maybe another user may be able to post it.
just want to check a couple of things and i have no backup of any of the
previous ones.

adric · Post by **adric** » Tue May 22, 2012 4:28 pm

I have all the previous ones from 2012 and a couple from 2011.
I have SkyDrive, but I haven't tried sharing anything on it. I can
upload it there. If you have an ftp server I could upload there with
a temp id that you could remove after I upload. Let me know what you think.

Al

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue May 22, 2012 9:58 pm

adric wrote:I have all the previous ones from 2012 and a couple from 2011.
I have SkyDrive, but I haven't tried sharing anything on it. I can
upload it there. If you have an ftp server I could upload there with
a temp id that you could remove after I upload. Let me know what you think.

Al

anywhere you like.
mediafire is free and quick.

i just want to see the one from i think 20120411

adric · Post by **adric** » Wed May 23, 2012 6:46 am

Okay, I put [url=http:///?g7x9dgjpaxd43jn]it[/url] on MediaFire. I did not realize it was free. Also, it looks like the problem has gone away - no more nagging from WU.

Post by **user_hidden** » Wed May 23, 2012 7:19 am

adric wrote:Okay, I put [url=http:///?g7x9dgjpaxd43jn]it[/url] on MediaFire. I did not realize it was free. Also, it looks like the problem has gone away - no more nagging from WU.

thnaks Al.

as you said it seems MS has fixed their issue.
i knew it wasn't my installer.
i think they like screwing with XP users!

i downloaded the old installer that you posted so i can archive it
as i had a few things i did to the msi that i lost my notes on.

hopefully MU/WU will stop playing.

adric · Post by **adric** » Wed May 23, 2012 8:00 am

More on this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/23 ... date_mess/

Microsoft has not, at the time of writing, issued an official advisory we can detect. We've asked Microsoft for comment and will update the story again when we learn more

Al

Post by **user_hidden** » Wed May 23, 2012 3:28 pm

adric wrote:More on this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/23 ... date_mess/
Microsoft has not, at the time of writing, issued an official advisory we can detect. We've asked Microsoft for comment and will update the story again when we learn more
Al

just plain MU/WU screw up as usual nothing more !

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:26 pm

updated 20120612 ....

adric · Post by **adric** » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:58 am

When I rebuild my system and use the latest updatepack, everything is fine with WU. When another Patch-Tuesday arrives with .NET updates and I let WU install them, I always end up being offered .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (KB951847) afterwards. It looks like updating the system that has a .NET UpdatePack installed, ends up breaking the detection for SP1. Any ideas?

Al

Post by **user_hidden** » Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:19 am

adric wrote:When I rebuild my system and use the latest updatepack, everything is fine with WU. When another Patch-Tuesday arrives with .NET updates and I let WU install them, I always end up being offered .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (KB951847) afterwards. It looks like updating the system that has a .NET UpdatePack installed, ends up breaking the detection for SP1. Any ideas?

Al

i have seen it before but i can only say somehow WU gets broken
or MS doesn't code properly.

i actually had that offerred on my system.
i let it be downloaded, start the instal and then all is fine.

i'll be looking into these querks over the summer when i have more time.

robertcollier4 · Post by **robertcollier4** » Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:37 pm

I am trying to produce a slipstream install CD of XP SP3 with .NET 1.1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 pre-installed. My primary goal is to have a minimal Windows installation size. So I think it would be advantagous to use this Onepiece installer instead correct? I believe that installing at RunOnceEx still has the problem of Windows creating lots of duplicate DLLs in the Windows directory.

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8316
[Release] .NET 2.0-3.0-3.5 GDR/QFE TRUE addons xp/2k3

Code: Select all

The peculiarity of these addons is that .NET framework is directly slipstreamed into your XP/2003 source, without the need of running .msi files or svcpack/runonce installations, a "true-mode" integration just like .net 1.0 in Windows Server 2003. 
So you'll get a working .NET framework already installed BEFORE T-13 (svcpack time), a very handy opportunity.

Post by **user_hidden** » Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:25 am

mine and Onepiece installers are pretty much have same end result.
there are NO dup dll's installed !

robertcollier4 wrote:I am trying to produce a slipstream install CD of XP SP3 with .NET 1.1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 pre-installed. My primary goal is to have a minimal Windows installation size. So I think it would be advantagous to use this Onepiece installer instead correct? I believe that installing at RunOnceEx still has the problem of Windows creating lots of duplicate DLLs in the Windows directory.

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8316
[Release] .NET 2.0-3.0-3.5 GDR/QFE TRUE addons xp/2k3
Code: Select all
The peculiarity of these addons is that .NET framework is directly slipstreamed into your XP/2003 source, without the need of running .msi files or svcpack/runonce installations, a "true-mode" integration just like .net 1.0 in Windows Server 2003. 
So you'll get a working .NET framework already installed BEFORE T-13 (svcpack time), a very handy opportunity.