[Addon] Microsoft .NET Framework Family 3.5 SP1 - 20131008
Because when you install .NET the 'offcial' way, the registry entries are 'carefully' organized by Windows Installer(Although Windows Installer & such careful way are totally bull-shit). But when you install installers made by u_h or me, all(u_h's)/some of(mine) registry entries needed to satisfy Windows Update are written 'rudely'.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
@yumeyao
Ahh yumeyao was not abducted by Aliens.
Thanks for the information hopefully someone finds a way to avoid this problem.
@user_hidden
To do that on over 20 computers every time a .NET update comes out mmm.
For now i will add a script for installing the .NET stuff over the Windows Auto Update Center.
Ahh yumeyao was not abducted by Aliens.

Thanks for the information hopefully someone finds a way to avoid this problem.
@user_hidden
To do that on over 20 computers every time a .NET update comes out mmm.

For now i will add a script for installing the .NET stuff over the Windows Auto Update Center.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
@user_hidden
I use the current .NET update pack 'Addon_Microsoft.Net_AIO_ROE_20111011.7z' after everything is installed Winodws Update Center promotes me to install the .NET Dezember updates. After i installed the .NET Dezember updates and restart my computer the Windows Update Center is promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update i install it too but everytime i restart my computer it will promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update.
I use the current .NET update pack 'Addon_Microsoft.Net_AIO_ROE_20111011.7z' after everything is installed Winodws Update Center promotes me to install the .NET Dezember updates. After i installed the .NET Dezember updates and restart my computer the Windows Update Center is promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update i install it too but everytime i restart my computer it will promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update.
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
Outbreaker wrote:@user_hidden
I use the current .NET update pack 'Addon_Microsoft.Net_AIO_ROE_20111011.7z' after everything is installed Winodws Update Center promotes me to install the .NET Dezember updates. After i installed the .NET Dezember updates and restart my computer the Windows Update Center is promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update i install it too but everytime i restart my computer it will promoting me to install the KB951847 .NET update.
I already explained that you should unpack the installer and apply the MUREGFIX.reg file and you will be fine.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
Yes ture but was this a .NET update pack problem and could this happen again in the future with the new version if some .NET updates come out?user_hidden wrote:@user_hidden
I already explained that you should unpack the installer and apply the MUREGFIX.reg file and you will be fine.
Ahh a forum full of thank posts would be annoying. Adding a 'Thank You' button in the forum would be nice.user_hidden wrote:hmmm, maybe i should just quit ?ricktendo64 wrote:Five years and not so much as one "thank you"
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
Outbreaker wrote:Yes ture but was this a .NET update pack problem and could this happen again in the future with the new version if some .NET updates come out?
Ahh a forum full of thank posts would be annoying. Adding a 'Thank You' button in the forum would be nice.
Can never tell the future with Microsoft.
They play games and are not very efficient.
So I can not guarantee what may happen.
As for a "Thank You" button that would be a nice addition to the
forum but that is up to RyanVM and it would probably entail a
forum software update.
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
- ricktendo64
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Honduras
- mr_smartepants
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:56 am
- Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
you could unpack the addon to get access to the net35.ex_.RicaNeaga wrote:Is asking too much of you to make also a (silent) .exe installer for this .net2.0-3.5 pack, so I can make it afterwards a svcpack (for it to be installed before ricktendo's .net4 addon during windows installation)? Your .net 1.1 is also a svcpack addon... Thanks
with 7zip unpack the net35.ex_ to get net35.exe.
run the exe with the "-ai" switch for silent install.
i can not guarantee this will install properly at T13 as like i said
it is designed for runonce.
I just tried to update a previously installed .NET (20110101) with your new switchless installer on XP and I do not see any reg entries for KB263380. WU still offers it as an update for .NET20 SP2. This is all that I see:
Is this supposed to work or do I need to install when there's no .Net present on the system?
Al
Code: Select all
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\A1FD99AC6E368ED3F88C973462E5D9BB DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3 REG_SZ 02:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{C09FB3CD-3D0C-3F2D-899A-6A1D67F2073F}.KB2633880\ 2/4/2012 18:59:06 106
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3\Features KB2633880 REG_SZ 6_vYTP70g5[_0YTmFIM&K7FnbX^[_3rnZVS23R6`,0p,jCK9u79jFc9[=LAeK91^9dpOO3olHGfebx5*Servicing_Key 2/4/2012 18:59:31 95
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3\Patches\0349BE9150117953E80C5ED001CB3F38 DisplayName REG_SZ KB2633880 2/16/2012 17:45:03 10
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{C09FB3CD-3D0C-3F2D-899A-6A1D67F2073F}.KB2633880 REG_SZ KB2633880 2/4/2012 18:59:15 10
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\Installer\Features\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3 KB2633880 REG_SZ Servicing_Key 2/4/2012 18:59:31 14
HKCR\Installer\Features\DC3BF90CC0D3D2F398A9A6D1762F70F3 KB2633880 REG_SZ Servicing_Key 2/4/2012 18:59:31 14
Al
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 6:01 am
How difficult would it actually be for one to alter the installation script/method so as to make it useable with SVCPACK?
I'm aiming to get all the .NETs installed during GUI Setup and am hoping to find a way to achieve this while still using Ricktendo64's Slim installer for .NET 4.
I mean, I still have a copy of YumeYao's last svcpack-worthy CAB for .NET 3.5 but it would be nice to not have to worry about updating it through MU/WU afterwards.
I'm aiming to get all the .NETs installed during GUI Setup and am hoping to find a way to achieve this while still using Ricktendo64's Slim installer for .NET 4.
I mean, I still have a copy of YumeYao's last svcpack-worthy CAB for .NET 3.5 but it would be nice to not have to worry about updating it through MU/WU afterwards.

-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 6:01 am
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
Anyone know why KB2518864, KB2572073 and KB2633880 have started to appear in Windows Update?
These KBs were replaced by KB2604092 (MS12-035) which is in the current addon/switchless.
These KBs were replaced by KB2604092 (MS12-035) which is in the current addon/switchless.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
adric wrote:Anyone know why KB2518864, KB2572073 and KB2633880 have started to appear in Windows Update?
These KBs were replaced by KB2604092 (MS12-035) which is in the current addon/switchless.
i have no clue....seems MU is in a screwup mode today !
will check into it but why all of a suddon these old replaced
KB's are being pushed.....
let ya know later today.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
anywhere you like.adric wrote:I have all the previous ones from 2012 and a couple from 2011.
I have SkyDrive, but I haven't tried sharing anything on it. I can
upload it there. If you have an ftp server I could upload there with
a temp id that you could remove after I upload. Let me know what you think.
Al
mediafire is free and quick.
i just want to see the one from i think 20120411
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
thnaks Al.adric wrote:Okay, I put [url=http:///?g7x9dgjpaxd43jn]it[/url] on MediaFire. I did not realize it was free. Also, it looks like the problem has gone away - no more nagging from WU.
as you said it seems MS has fixed their issue.
i knew it wasn't my installer.
i think they like screwing with XP users!
i downloaded the old installer that you posted so i can archive it
as i had a few things i did to the msi that i lost my notes on.
hopefully MU/WU will stop playing.
More on this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/23 ... date_mess/
Al
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/23 ... date_mess/
Microsoft has not, at the time of writing, issued an official advisory we can detect. We've asked Microsoft for comment and will update the story again when we learn more
Al
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
just plain MU/WU screw up as usual nothing more !adric wrote:More on this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/23 ... date_mess/AlMicrosoft has not, at the time of writing, issued an official advisory we can detect. We've asked Microsoft for comment and will update the story again when we learn more
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
When I rebuild my system and use the latest updatepack, everything is fine with WU. When another Patch-Tuesday arrives with .NET updates and I let WU install them, I always end up being offered .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (KB951847) afterwards. It looks like updating the system that has a .NET UpdatePack installed, ends up breaking the detection for SP1. Any ideas?
Al
Al
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
i have seen it before but i can only say somehow WU gets brokenadric wrote:When I rebuild my system and use the latest updatepack, everything is fine with WU. When another Patch-Tuesday arrives with .NET updates and I let WU install them, I always end up being offered .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (KB951847) afterwards. It looks like updating the system that has a .NET UpdatePack installed, ends up breaking the detection for SP1. Any ideas?
Al
or MS doesn't code properly.
i actually had that offerred on my system.
i let it be downloaded, start the instal and then all is fine.
i'll be looking into these querks over the summer when i have more time.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:20 am
I am trying to produce a slipstream install CD of XP SP3 with .NET 1.1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 pre-installed. My primary goal is to have a minimal Windows installation size. So I think it would be advantagous to use this Onepiece installer instead correct? I believe that installing at RunOnceEx still has the problem of Windows creating lots of duplicate DLLs in the Windows directory.
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8316
[Release] .NET 2.0-3.0-3.5 GDR/QFE TRUE addons xp/2k3
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8316
[Release] .NET 2.0-3.0-3.5 GDR/QFE TRUE addons xp/2k3
Code: Select all
The peculiarity of these addons is that .NET framework is directly slipstreamed into your XP/2003 source, without the need of running .msi files or svcpack/runonce installations, a "true-mode" integration just like .net 1.0 in Windows Server 2003.
So you'll get a working .NET framework already installed BEFORE T-13 (svcpack time), a very handy opportunity.
- user_hidden
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: Canada eh!
mine and Onepiece installers are pretty much have same end result.
there are NO dup dll's installed !
there are NO dup dll's installed !
robertcollier4 wrote:I am trying to produce a slipstream install CD of XP SP3 with .NET 1.1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 pre-installed. My primary goal is to have a minimal Windows installation size. So I think it would be advantagous to use this Onepiece installer instead correct? I believe that installing at RunOnceEx still has the problem of Windows creating lots of duplicate DLLs in the Windows directory.
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8316
[Release] .NET 2.0-3.0-3.5 GDR/QFE TRUE addons xp/2k3
Code: Select all
The peculiarity of these addons is that .NET framework is directly slipstreamed into your XP/2003 source, without the need of running .msi files or svcpack/runonce installations, a "true-mode" integration just like .net 1.0 in Windows Server 2003. So you'll get a working .NET framework already installed BEFORE T-13 (svcpack time), a very handy opportunity.