Dream Update Pack for XP SP3 post 11072013

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:29 pm

Dream_UpdatePack_XPSP3_11072013

Download : http://www.xxxxxxxx.com/update/Dream_Up ... 1072013.7z
or : http://www.xxxxxxxx.com/download/eary2o ... 1072013.7z
or : http://www.xxxxxxxx.com/archive/bT6Icrf ... 07201.html
CRC-32: 613FD409
MD5: EC94442A9DE1FB3EFC3607467AB8A88C
SHA-1: CFAD9936C2E6C2A80F8ADD53DB8B4715575A1E6F
OS: Windows XP SP3 (x86)
Date: 11072013
Version: 1
Size: 31.29 MB

Dream Update Pack can be used along with :
Nite 1.4.9.1: http://www.nliteos.com/
and
RVM Integrator 1.6: http://www.siginetsoftware.com/forum/sh ... .php?t=601
On a clean XP SP3 ENU source.

What is included:

KB892130 - Windows Genuine Advantage Validation Tool ActiveX Control 1.9.42.0
KB898461 - Permanent copy of the Package Installer for Windows version 6.3.13.0
KB905474 - Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications (as addon)
KB909520 - Software update for Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider
KB923789 - Security Update for Flash Player
KB923561 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB950762 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB931125 - Microsoft Root Certificates Update
KB946648 - Security update for Windows Messenger 4.7
KB950974 - Vulnerability in Event System could allow remote code execution
KB951376 - Vulnerability in Bluetooth stack could allow remote code execution
KB951978 - Script output is not displayed as expected when running VBScript or JScript scripts
KB952004 - Description of the security update for MSDTC Transaction Facility (April 2009)
KB952069 - Security update for Windows Media Format Runtime and Media Foundation
KB952287 - Security update for Windows
KB952954 - Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows Image Color Management could allow remote code execution
KB954155 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Runtime Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Windows Media Audio Voice Decoder)
KB956572 - Description of the security update for Windows Service Isolation (April 2009)
KB956802 - Vulnerabilities in GDI could allow remote code execution
KB956844 - Vulnerability in DHTML Editing Component ActiveX Control Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB959426 - KB960803 - Security update for Windows
KB960859 - Vulnerability in Telnet Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB968389 - Update to help strengthen authentication credentials in specific scenarios
KB969059 - Vulnerability in Indexing Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB971029 - Update to restrict AutoRun entries in the AutoPlay dialog to only CD and DVD drives
KB971513 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB971657 - Vulnerability in Workstation Service Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB972270 - Vulnerability in the Embedded OpenType Font Engine could allow remote code execution
KB973507 - Security update for the Active Template Library
KB973540 - Security update for Windows Media Player 9
KB973815 - Security update for Microsoft MSWebDVD ActiveX Control
KB973869 - Security update for Microsoft DHTML Editing Component ActiveX Control
KB973904 - Vulnerability in WordPad and Office Text Converters Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB974112 - Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB974318 - Vulnerabilities in Internet Authentication Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB974392 - Vulnerability in the Local Security Authority Subsystem service could allow denial of service
KB974571 - Vulnerabilities in Windows CryptoAPI Could Allow Spoofing
KB975025 - Security update for Audio Compression Manager: October 13, 2009
KB975558 - Vulnerability in MPEG-4 Codec Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB975560 - Vulnerability in Microsoft DirectShow Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB975713 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Handler could allow remote code execution
KB977816 - Vulnerability in Microsoft MPEG Layer-3 Codecs Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB977914 - Vulnerability in Microsoft AVI filter Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB978338 - Vulnerabilities in Windows ISATAP Component Could Allow Spoofing
KB978542 - Vulnerability in Outlook Express and Windows Mail Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB978695 - Security Update for Windows Media Format Runtime 9 for Windows XP SP3
KB978706 - Vulnerability in Microsoft Paint could allow remote code execution
KB979309 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Authenticode Verification that could allow remote code execution
KB979482 - Vulnerabilities in Media Decompression Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB979687 - Vulnerability in COM Validation in Windows Shell and WordPad Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB981322 - Vulnerability in Unicode Scripts Processor Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB981997 - Vulnerability in Windows Movie Maker Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB982132 - Vulnerability in the Embedded OpenType Font Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB982665 - Vulnerability in Cinepak Codec Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2115168 - Vulnerability in Microsoft MPEG Layer-3 Codecs Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2229593 - Vulnerability in Help and Support Center Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2296011 - Vulnerability in Windows Common Control Library Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2347290 - Vulnerability in Print Spooler Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2360937 - Vulnerability in Windows Local Procedure Call Could Cause Elevation of Privilege
KB2378111 - Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2387149 - Vulnerability in Microsoft Foundation Classes Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2393802 - Vulnerability in Windows Kernel could allow elevation of privilege
KB2419632 - Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Data Access Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2423089 - Vulnerability in Windows Address Book Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2440591 - Vulnerability in Routing and Remote Access Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2443105 - Insecure Library Loading in Internet Connection Signup Wizard Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2478960 - Vulnerability in Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Could Allow Local Elevation of Privilege
KB2478971 - Vulnerabilities in Kerberos Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2479943 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2481109 -Security Update for Windows XP
KB2483185 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Graphics Processing Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2485663 - Vulnerability in WordPad Text Converters Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2492386 - Application Compatibility Update for Windows XP
KB2506212 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2507938 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2508429 - Vulnerability in SMB Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2509553 - Vulnerability in DNS Resolution Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2510581 - Vulnerability in JScript and VBScript v5.7 Scripting Engines Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2535512 - Vulnerabilities in Distributed File System Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2536276 - Vulnerabilities in SMB Client could allow remote code execution
KB2544893 - Vulnerability in MHTML Could Allow Information Disclosure
KB2564958 - Security Update for Active Accessibility in Windows
KB2566454 - Vulnerability in Remote Access Service NDISTAPI Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2570947 - Vulnerability in Windows Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2584146 - Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2585542 - Vulnerability in SSL/TLS Could Allow Information Disclosure
KB2592799 - Vulnerability in Ancillary Function Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2598479 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2603381 - Vulnerability in Windows Object Packager Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2618451 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2620712 - Vulnerability in Windows Client/Server Runtime Subsystem Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2619339 - Vulnerability in Windows Media Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2624667 - Vulnerability in OLE Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2631813 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2653956 - Vulnerability in Windows Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2655992 - Vulnerability in TLS Could Allow Information Disclosure
KB2659262 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2661637 - Vulnerability in Indeo Codec Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2676562 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2686509 - Security Update Enables Fixes to a Problem that can Occur with the Loading of Keyboard Layout Files
KB2691442 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2698365 - Vulnerability in Microsoft Data Access Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2705219 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Networking Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2712808 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Networking Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2719985 - Vulnerability in Microsoft XML Core Services 3.0 & 6.0 Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2723135 - Vulnerability in Remote Desktop Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2727528 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2749655 - Update to resolve issues in Windows
KB2753842 - Vulnerability in the OpenType Compact Font Format (CFF) Driver Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2757638 - Vulnerabilities in Microsoft XML Core Services 6.0 Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2758857 - Vulnerability in Windows File Handling Component Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2770660 - Vulnerability in DirectPlay Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2779562 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2780091 - Vulnerability in Media Decompression Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2798897 - Windows Revoked Roots Certificates Update
KB2802968 - Vulnerability in OLE Automation Could Allow Remote Code Execution
KB2807986 - Vulnerabilities in Kernel-Mode Drivers Could Allow Elevation Of Privilege
KB2808679 - Unauthorized Digital Certificates Could Allow Spoofing
KB2813345 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2820197 - Cumulative Security Update for ActiveX Killbits for Windows XP
KB2820917 - Vulnerability in Windows Client/Server Run-time Subsystem (CSRSS) Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
KB2829361 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2838727 - Security Update for Windows XP
KB2839229 - Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
Windows Update Agent Update

Wait
Aio Dream Update Pack XP SP3
With WMP11 + IE8
ENJOY[/quote]

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:38 pm

Whats in it? Please list all of the included items.

(Otherwise it is useless)

Post by **user_hidden** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:11 pm

QFE or GDR ?
Is this up to date with clean MU after update ?

I personally have no reason to download and check but i'm sure others will and report.

bphlpt · Post by **bphlpt** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:14 pm

It would also be helpful to summarize the basic differences between this pack and the other popular options, ie why did you create this pack? Why weren't the others meeting your needs? Making this pack just to prove you can make one is perfectly fine as far as it goes, but why should anyone else use it?

Cheers and Regards

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:51 pm

i've downloaded and will try on a virtualbox install...
might be several days before i can test it out...

i *HIGHLY* applaud having MORE than "just two" options to pick from as far as update packs go...

i've been toying around with creating my own also...
but so far the furthest i've gotten is creating my own IE8 and WMP11 "merged" addon...

one of the things that has always "bugged me" about this site is the whole mentality of "we already have a public update pack, why create your own?"...

but what bugs me even more is that when you go to a link that "discusses" the 'differences' between the public releases, you land on a page talking about releases that haven't been around for YEARS... why is that post even HERE, dated 2006 and at the TOP as if it were "important" or something...

long story short (too late?), i wish MORE people would post their "look what i made" update packs...

but yes, also a brief description of what makes it different from the "other two"...

i'm from the "camp" that believes one of these days we will wake up and read a post from "the two" saying they've "moved on", where would that leave us?

so yeah, let's ENCOURAGE *ALL* the "look what i made" update packs from those that have learned the know-how to create one...

THE MORE THE MERRIER

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:34 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote:Whats in it? Please list all of the included items.

(Otherwise it is useless)

DONE Kelsenellenelvian

bphlpt · Post by **bphlpt** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:57 pm

Thank you for the list, Dream World, but what about:

bphlpt wrote:It would also be helpful to summarize the basic differences between this pack and the other popular options, ie why did you create this pack? Why weren't the others meeting your needs? Making this pack just to prove you can make one is perfectly fine as far as it goes, but why should anyone else use it?

long-lurker wrote: but yes, also a brief description of what makes it different from the "other two"...

Cheers and Regards

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:39 pm

hi
be patient because i am busy now
and i answered you in wincert
here is the answer
i used to intgrate xable update pack
but it stopped since 12/12/2012
so i wanted to make my own pack which has high priority updates
and all other updates have hotfixs which not very important

pdl808 · Post by **pdl808** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:31 pm

I did a new build and installation using your update pack.

MS update says I need the following 17 High-Priority updates:

kb890830, kb951376, kb961118, kb968389, kb972270, kb975560, kb978338, kb2296011, kb2570947

kb2603381, kb2618451, kb2659262, kb2686509, kb2820197, kb2834886, kb2845187, kb2850851.

I would also suggest that you move XPSP3 to the beginning of the file name and change the date format to YYYYMMDD.

Dates are a numbering system. In a numbering system, the most significant digit belongs on the left and the least significant digit belongs on the right.

This has the added benefit, if your have several files in a folder, they will sort in chronological order with the newest one on the bottom.

ELiTE · Post by **ELiTE** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:29 pm

long-lurker wrote:one of the things that has always "bugged me" about this site is the whole mentality of "we already have a public update pack, why create your own?"...

It's just a hazing directed at new guys posting their own stuff. No big deal. You learn to shrug it off and move on. You should have heard the howling and screaming when I first started posting my stuff here. Once they get to know the member here at RVM it's business as usual. You create something, you post it. Like you said "The more, the merrier". Nobody ever died from having multiple choices..............

bphlpt · Post by **bphlpt** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:09 pm

Nowhere in this thread have I said anything about not wanting or needing another option when it comes to either Apps or Update Packs. I only ask for it to be clarified as to how the new option is different than other options that are available. Dream World has stated that his update pack is high priority updates only, similar to the old xable pack which does not seem to be updated anymore. That seems to be a valid reason to make this pack. I'm not familiar enough with either this pack or u_h's pack to know what the exact differences are between them, but I believe they are different based on that explanation. Once this pack is stabilized, perhaps it would be interesting to see a chart showing the differences between this pack, u_h's and OnePiece's pack, for the user's information.

Cheers and Regards

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:55 pm

ELiTE wrote:
long-lurker wrote:one of the things that has always "bugged me" about this site is the whole mentality of "we already have a public update pack, why create your own?"...
It's just a hazing directed at new guys posting their own stuff. No big deal. You learn to shrug it off and move on. You should have heard the howling and screaming when I first started posting my stuff here. Once they get to know the member here at RVM it's business as usual. You create something, you post it. Like you said "The more, the merrier". Nobody ever died from having multiple choices..............

I Agree with you
another thing:
i have my special way to get the hotfixs that windows need
so users have multiple choices
they can see my pack , user_hidden pack and onepiece pack
and they choose what they need
my pack has 128
about 118 are high
thanks every body for supporting me

ricktendo64 · Post by **ricktendo64** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:25 pm

You mistake suggestions for being attacked.

You wont hear any more "attacks" (suggestions) from me

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:00 am

Same here.

I'm out....

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:35 am

hey guys
i was angry a little
i thought your words was little Suffused
i am very very happy with your suggestion
so if any body are sad
do not be sad as we all are friends

Post by **user_hidden** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:07 am

there was never any bashing in this thread just questions of clarity !
later scater .... salut

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:46 am

thanks every body
i will improve it

cosy · Post by **cosy** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:58 pm

hallelujah!

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:08 pm

cosy wrote:hallelujah!

thanks alot

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:37 pm

I so have learned my lesson about helping new people here...

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:37 pm

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:20 pm

"publicly" cutting him/her off at the knees isn't exactly the best "attitude" on your part either!

long way to go and lots to learn - so be it, one has to start somewhere...

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:22 pm

Without some major changes this pack needs to be used with extreme caution

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:33 pm

edit: what ELiTE said (below)...

ELiTE · Post by **ELiTE** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:46 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote:You didn't deal with his post attitude and threatening pm's over at wincert.

There was some major issues and attitude.

He threw major fits when improvements were suggested.

Someone who wants my phone number to call me and threatens me over pm deserves to be cut at the knees.

Well, this isn't WinCert. We need to be tolerant and only post what's best for the forum. Toxic comments and personal beefs benefit no one and only degrade and destroy any reason to visit/join RVM.

This aint a schoolyard and IMHO call it what you want: Bullying is bullying............I say there's no room for it here....

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:24 pm

THANK YOU

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:55 pm

Ok, i will then just warn others that this pack will render any install other then the most basic standard xp installation complletly unstable and quite possibly unusable.

When i said it was the kind of pack i would use and suggested changes that would fix it i was deemed to be attacking.

I tried to support him and play nice.

He got very aggresive and threatening. Now you guys are shitting on me for some new guy that does'nt want to recieve help from others?

OnePiece Alb · Post by **OnePiece Alb** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:03 pm

ELiTE wrote:Well, this isn't WinCert

Wincert (I can say the same for RyanVM community) is one of the community the most Serious and Well-Managed I've seen all over the web

Ciao.

ELiTE · Post by **ELiTE** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:08 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote:Now you guys are shitting on me for some new guy that does'nt want to recieve help from others?

IMHO It's not about taking sides. It's not about supporting or not supporting anybody. It's about RESPECT. Respect for fellow members and respect for the forum. It's common sense.

That's all I have to say about the issue........

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:26 am

long-lurker wrote:i've downloaded and will try on a virtualbox install...
might be several days before i can test it out...

i *HIGHLY* applaud having MORE than "just two" options to pick from as far as update packs go...

i've been toying around with creating my own also...
but so far the furthest i've gotten is creating my own IE8 and WMP11 "merged" addon...

one of the things that has always "bugged me" about this site is the whole mentality of "we already have a public update pack, why create your own?"...

but what bugs me even more is that when you go to a link that "discusses" the 'differences' between the public releases, you land on a page talking about releases that haven't been around for YEARS... why is that post even HERE, dated 2006 and at the TOP as if it were "important" or something...

long story short (too late?), i wish MORE people would post their "look what i made" update packs...

but yes, also a brief description of what makes it different from the "other two"...

i'm from the "camp" that believes one of these days we will wake up and read a post from "the two" saying they've "moved on", where would that leave us?

so yeah, let's ENCOURAGE *ALL* the "look what i made" update packs from those that have learned the know-how to create one...

THE MORE THE MERRIER

Seems to me you were the one attacking others before anyone else was too. We had only supplied suggestions you instantly started scolding us for a imagined slight that was not even directed towards you.

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:24 pm

remember what one piece said
"Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead"
and no one asked him "why he made his pack"
or "what is the difference between his pack and others"
we have now multiple choices
any one can choose one of it

keloo05 · Post by **keloo05** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:43 pm

Onepiece stated from the beginning what are the differences beetween his pack and Ryan's pack:

This XP post-SP3 All-in-One Update Pack differs from Ryan's One, which is more customizable to your needs, as it includes by default more stuff like IE8, DX updates, all .NETs or WMP11 for an easier integration, along with official and nearly all request-only hotfixes (RyanVM's Update Pack is more selective with request-only hotfixes, which is fine): all in a few MBs.

Please don't get me wrong. It's good to have multiple choices, but the users would like to know the differences beetween update packs, so they can make a choice: which one is better for their needs.
Also, a new pack brings some suspicion: does the pack integrate without consequences? , is the maker experienced or just a beginner?, etc.

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:37 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote: Seems to me you were the one attacking others before anyone else was too. We had only supplied suggestions you instantly started scolding us for a imagined slight that was not even directed towards you.

you are STIRRING THE POT...
and you KNOW IT !!!...

there is a very VERY long history here of "why learn to create an update pack, we have two excellent one's to chose from"...

my post was intended to ENCOURAGE users to create update packs...
YOU KNOW THAT, so does everyone else that read it...

STOP STIRRING THE POT !!!...
you are LOSING the "respect" of your peers !!!...

you are a MODERATOR and SHOULD be ABOVE this type of CRAP !!!...

if YOU decide to continue down this path, i sincerely hope that your MODERATOR priveleges are PULLED OUT FROM UNDER YOU !!!...

Post by **user_hidden** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:48 pm

That is enough !
You are all off topic to this thread.

Let's allow "Dream World" to clean up his contribution if he can.

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:54 pm

Very few around here have shown us original pack makers around here respect in a really long time. Most of the newer people (including you) only demand updates and changes. Then whine when things aren't done in a timely manner. You guys need to learn we are people and do this on our own time without recompense! It's members like you that made slot of us quit...

long-lurker · Post by **long-lurker** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:04 pm

you AROGANT sob !!!...
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH !!!...

look through MY posts...
i have a HISTORY of telling the "do it now" folks to be PATIENT and not to expect fixes/updats "at the drop of a hat"...

SHUT UP !!!...
YOU are the one that will NOT let the off-topic "fade into the sunset"...

yes, YOU...
not me... YOU !!!...

Kelsenellenelvian · Post by **Kelsenellenelvian** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:22 pm

Dream world - let me know when you update and I would like to try it.

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:50 pm

Welcome all
I hope that our dialogue on development and improvement
And I like to say I'm not a beginner
I am in this field since 9 years and more
and i have my own website but not in English
and all errors will be fixed in the next version

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:52 pm

Kelsenellenelvian wrote:Dream world - let me know when you update and I would like to try it.

next version in 2013/8/11

Dream World · Post by **Dream World** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:55 pm

every body
long-lurker want to support any new men
he didn't mean any bad thing
thanks every body

Post by **user_hidden** » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:43 pm

This a quote taken from Xable over at Wincert forums

xable wrote:

Posted July 21, 2013, 08:48 AM

Hi everyone,

It's been brought to my attention that this is infact my update pack and addons bodged together by someone who doesn't know what they are doing, "Dream" posted on my forum asking for help and was quite rude.

All this is without my permission. My advise is to leave this well alone and use an alternative, I will update my pack at some point however I've broke my hand and it's in plaster atm so cannot give an eta.

@Dream World, please take this down, you didn't ask if you could take my packs, update them and claim them as your own and I don't appreciate you doing so. It's not cool. By all means learn how to make them and build your own like every other pack maker has done, there are plenty of people, including myself that will help you.

Regards

Darren aka xable

Post by **user_hidden** » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:45 pm

Thread LOCKED !!!