RyanVM.net Discussion Board

I didn't get a update for a KB931906. One of the files listed is a CAPICOM.dll, but I can't find that file on any of my computers. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms07-028.mspx Affected Software: • CAPICOM — Download the update • Platform SDK Redistributable: CAPICOM — Download th...

latest ver user.dll cause error in my modded icons shell32.dll too bad... does user.dll fix for security purpose also? or maybe i should use back old user.dll? KB925902 has known issues when using those icon packs. Try here: http://forum.crystalxp.net/index.php?showtopic=18709 Otherwise, Microsoft ...

And Adobe just released Flash Player 9.0.45.0. There's always next month.

When user32.dll conflicts with hhctrl.ocx, KB935448 will fix those problems. If it is anything other than hhctrl.ocx, like shell32.dll, it is the result of some sort of theming that uses modified system files. XP themes don't modify system files, so this is purely a result of a third-party. AVG was ...

$100 says those complaining of no boot and other serious problems are the same people who altered their system in a negative way like http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909444 That one wasn't re-released. It was not caused by the hotfix. They are still releasing more hotfixes on tuesday. http://www.dsl...

Actually I haven't had any problems with 925902 or any past hotfix. I can't understand why other people do, though.

Each hotfix has a gdr and a qfe folder but both of those files are from qfe, as can be seen in the file's properties.

Am I not supposed to have qfe?

RyanVM wrote:I'm guessing (without having actually checked myself) that one is QFE and one is GDR?

Both files say 5.2.3790.2847 (srv03_sp1_qfe.061210-2319)

The hhctrl.ocx in 935448 is the same version as the hhctrl.ocx in 928843, 5.2.3790.2847, but they are different files with different sums. So you shouldn't pay attention to the version. C:\WINDOWS\$NtUninstallKB935448$>md5sum hhctrl.ocx dc0613ae860a306cadc221e8e6e3d2a5 *hhctrl.ocx C:\WINDOWS\$NtUnin...

Just a heads up that KB935448 should be included when you include KB925902 because of the reason outlined in KB935448: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935448/

What does it do for multi-core laptops that aren't exactly meant for gaming? Question is why the hotfix requires an additional boot.ini parameter. They should have the kernel test for conditions (# of processors or cores) to determine if it is needed and that registry entry alone should determine if...

One computer has the last December update pack + all updates and the laptop has February update pack, and neither automatically adjusted for the DST changes this evening. The non-update pack computer downstairs automatically fixed the time. I tried rebooting. It is supposed to either 1) prompt at lo...

Everything seems to work fine for me.. including USB. Then I realized I didn't want to redo everything so I went back to my install that i've had for almost two years.

I think 918005 USB update is missing a catalog which is why it is saying the files aren't signed. svcpack.inf has a line for 918005's catalog file but I looked in the svcpack folder and there was no KB918005.cat/KB918005.ca_. I integrated 2.1.5 into two different XP sources and neither have that fil...