[Discontinued] WU Zero Update Pack
[Discontinued] WU Zero Update Pack
project stoped.
Last edited by boooggy on Sat May 12, 2007 4:12 pm, edited 56 times in total.
Re: [Release]Update Pack 1.0 (WU only)
what mods are made to explorer etc , screenshot?boooggy wrote:here is an update pack which contains the updates found on WU till today:
size 31.9mb
hash: EB7D72B803A5F04BE1B7233D1594D418
the list of updates:
also contains MRT, highmat, original WGA, Microsoft Update, Hashtab, Unlocker 1.7.7, makecab, cabarc, modifype and modded explorer.exe, shell32.dll, msgina.dll.Code: Select all
KB319740, KB873339, KB884883, KB885250, KB885835 KB885836, KB886185, KB887472, KB887606, KB887742 KB887797, KB888113, KB888302, KB890046, KB890859 KB891781, KB893066, KB893756, KB893803, KB894391 KB896344, KB896358, KB896422, KB896423, KB896424 KB896428, KB898461, KB899587, KB899589, KB899591 KB900725, KB900930, KB901017, KB901214, KB902400 KB904706, KB905414, KB905749, KB908519, KB909520 KB910437, KB912919
@fluid
i think u can but i recommand integration on a fresh source.
@glent
msgina.dll modded with xpize
explorer.exe and shell32.dll modded with vista transformation pack 3 and xpize
screenshot:

i think u can but i recommand integration on a fresh source.
@glent
msgina.dll modded with xpize
explorer.exe and shell32.dll modded with vista transformation pack 3 and xpize
screenshot:

Last edited by boooggy on Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Damn you boooggy you beat me to it
But mine is gonna be just critical fixes and nothing else 


Last edited by Xable on Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
@Booggy... the file needs to be renamed to Boooggy_UpdatePack.cab or the integrator will not see it as an UpdatePack. You have it named Boooggy_Update_Pack.cab right now.
Edit:
I also found a few files that are not 8.3 compliant.
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - GWFSPidGen.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - HighMATCD.chm
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - LegitCheckControl.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerCOM.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerDriver4.sys
Not a big deal for most users... but the files are not following the 8.3 rule of thumb.
Edit:
I also found a few files that are not 8.3 compliant.
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - GWFSPidGen.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - HighMATCD.chm
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - LegitCheckControl.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerCOM.dll
WARNING: Filename Exceeds 8.3 Format - UnlockerDriver4.sys
Not a big deal for most users... but the files are not following the 8.3 rule of thumb.

yes i agree with ryan, im glad there is only a wu pack, but the fact that you mode the files in the pack kinda doesnt work for me, dont mean to sound ungratefull but maybe you can create a clean pack, then create an addon with the modded files like what ryan did with sfc, and uxtheme this way the user has a choice of preference. but good job nonetheless very good in fact.
Don't sweat petty things....or pet sweaty things
- Mavericks choice
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:39 am
- Location: Downunder
Besides, for comparison, I found that Ryan's 2.01 + Siginet's Addon v1.5 produce 95 "KB*.*" files in the \i386\svcpack folder, while Boooggy's WUZero_UpdatePack.cab (posted Jan 13th) produces only 51 "KB*.*" files when integrating with a clean SP2.
Also, Boooggy's pack contains some KB updates that are NOT found in the Ryan 2.01 + Siginet 1.5 packages, and vice versa !!!??!! (ie. 885250, 886185 ...)
Hmm, this really confuses me ...
Also, Boooggy's pack contains some KB updates that are NOT found in the Ryan 2.01 + Siginet 1.5 packages, and vice versa !!!??!! (ie. 885250, 886185 ...)
Hmm, this really confuses me ...

- Mavericks choice
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:39 am
- Location: Downunder
Just ran the critical pack only on a workstation here & appears to be all good. Checked wu & no high priority patches req'd.dumpper wrote:Besides, for comparison, I found that Ryan's 2.01 + Siginet's Addon v1.5 produce 95 "KB*.*" files in the \i386\svcpack folder, while Boooggy's WUZero_UpdatePack.cab (posted Jan 13th) produces only 51 "KB*.*" files when integrating with a clean SP2.
Also, Boooggy's pack contains some KB updates that are NOT found in the Ryan 2.01 + Siginet 1.5 packages, and vice versa !!!??!! (ie. 885250, 886185 ...)
Hmm, this really confuses me ...
Cheers
MC
The Man from Aus
- cyberloner
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:13 am
- Location: http://www.cybermania.ws
- Contact:
hi Im new to this forum, but I have alredy done an XP cd with some goodies integrated using nLite and Powerpacker(thanks Siginet).
Anyway, does the bigger pack include the explorer mods mentioned earlier? Looks like it doesnt.
why not include Flash/Shockwave player to make it a full alternative to Ryan's?
Anyway, does the bigger pack include the explorer mods mentioned earlier? Looks like it doesnt.
why not include Flash/Shockwave player to make it a full alternative to Ryan's?
ok, i finally got around to reading this topic (!!)...
I'm confused. I see that it's an alternative to Ryan's pack, but what is the difference?
Is the method of integration the same? Are the updates the same?
Basically, I'm wondering why you went through the trouble of making another pack - what is the diff between this and Ryan's?
I'm confused. I see that it's an alternative to Ryan's pack, but what is the difference?
Is the method of integration the same? Are the updates the same?
Basically, I'm wondering why you went through the trouble of making another pack - what is the diff between this and Ryan's?
the first one contains all updates that are found on Windows Update except windows media player 10 and windows media connect 2.
the second one contains all WU updates and wmp 10 and wmc2. so if u use this one when u getting on WU u will find only the 2 .net framework.
the difference compare to Ryan's is that my packs contain ONLY WU updates.
the second one contains all WU updates and wmp 10 and wmc2. so if u use this one when u getting on WU u will find only the 2 .net framework.
the difference compare to Ryan's is that my packs contain ONLY WU updates.
any way to test that all updates have been successfully installed from the WUZero_UpdatePack.cab ? (besides going to WU)
[edit]
I ran QFECHECK, and got some errors:
Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I'm using
Tcpip.sys (100 Connections): RVMAddonsTCPIP_1.0.cab
UXTheme.dll: RVMAddonsUXTheme_1.0.cab
Why aren't these hotfixes correctly installed?
[edit]
I ran QFECHECK, and got some errors:
KB909520: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB887797: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB893066: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB900725: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB905915: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB909520: Software update for Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider
KB887797: Outlook Express for Windows update
KB893066: Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP could allow remote code execution and denial of service
KB900725: Vulnerabilities in the Windows shell could allow for remote code execution
KB905915: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer - December 2005
Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I'm using
Tcpip.sys (100 Connections): RVMAddonsTCPIP_1.0.cab
UXTheme.dll: RVMAddonsUXTheme_1.0.cab
Why aren't these hotfixes correctly installed?
Last edited by a06 on Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
You know, you could actually look at the KB articles to see what files are hotfixeda06 wrote:any way to test that all updates have been successfully installed from the WUZero_UpdatePack.cab ? (besides going to WU)
[edit]
I ran QFECHECK, and got some errors:KB909520: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB887797: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB893066: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB900725: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
KB905915: This hotfix should be reinstalled.KB909520: Software update for Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider
KB887797: Outlook Express for Windows update
KB893066: Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP could allow remote code execution and denial of service
KB900725: Vulnerabilities in the Windows shell could allow for remote code execution
KB905915: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer - December 2005
Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I'm using
Tcpip.sys (100 Connections): RVMAddonsTCPIP_1.0.cab
UXTheme.dll: RVMAddonsUXTheme_1.0.cab
Why aren't these hotfixes correctly installed?

I tried that, but that doesn't really help me figure out why qfecheck says these hotfixes are incorrectly installed.RyanVM wrote:You know, you could actually look at the KB articles to see what files are hotfixed
I'm sure someone like yourself understands what all this means a lot better than I do - that's why I'm asking.
Here is the output for that command:Xable wrote:qfecheck -v
will give you more info.
Code: Select all
Windows XP Hotfix Validation Report for \\XPTEST
Report Date: 1/29/2006 8:50pm
Current Service Pack Level: Service Pack 2
Hotfixes Identified:
KB909520: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
The following files are incorrect for this hotfix:
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\BASECSP.DLL
Q282784: Current on system.
KB873339: Current on system.
KB885250: Current on system.
KB885835: Current on system.
KB885836: Current on system.
KB885884: Current on system.
KB886185: Current on system.
KB887472: Current on system.
KB887742: Current on system.
KB887797: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
The following files are incorrect for this hotfix:
C:\PROGRAM FILES\COMMON FILES\SYSTEM\WAB32.DLL
C:\PROGRAM FILES\OUTLOOK EXPRESS\WABIMP.DLL
KB888113: Current on system.
KB888302: Current on system.
KB890046: Current on system.
KB890859: Current on system.
KB891781: Current on system.
KB893066: Current on system.
KB893357: Current on system.
KB893756: Current on system.
KB893803: Current on system.
KB894391: Current on system.
KB896256: Current on system.
KB896344: Current on system.
KB896358: Current on system.
KB896422: Current on system.
KB896423: Current on system.
KB896424: Current on system.
KB896428: Current on system.
KB898461: Current on system.
KB899587: Current on system.
KB899589: Current on system.
KB899591: Current on system.
KB900725: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
The following files are not valid in the system catalog:
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHLWAPI.DLL
KB900930: Current on system.
KB901017: Current on system.
KB901214: Current on system.
KB902400: Current on system.
KB904706: Current on system.
KB905414: Current on system.
KB905749: Current on system.
KB905915: This hotfix should be reinstalled.
The following files are not valid in the system catalog:
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\WININET.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\URLMON.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\IEPEERS.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DXTRANS.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DANIM.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CDFVIEW.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\BROWSEUI.DLL
C:\PROGRAM FILES\INTERNET EXPLORER\IEDW.EXE
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\EXTMGR.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHLWAPI.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\SHDOCVW.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\PNGFILT.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSTIME.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSRATING.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSHTMLED.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSHTML.DLL
C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\INSENG.DLL
KB908519: Current on system.
KB910437: Current on system.
KB912919: Current on system.