[Updated] XP SP3 Update Pack 02.10-01

Windows XP Professional Update Pack discussion.
Post Reply
benjamminzIS
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:07 am

Post by benjamminzIS » Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:16 pm

some replies to the questions posed would be helpful I think... ???
_coming soon, don't hold your breath

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:02 pm

Which questions? About nLite? I dunno how or if I want to fix it for nLite, sorry. Ask nuhi for T13 support.

benjamminzIS
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:07 am

Post by benjamminzIS » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:54 pm

redxii wrote:Which questions? About nLite? I dunno how or if I want to fix it for nLite, sorry. Ask nuhi for T13 support.
maybe not the cleanest but I would think you could make a self deleting .bat script that was run @ svcpack (t13) that placed the necessary keys into the registry... I dunno what would be wrong with that other than having to move the registry info into the .bat script and adding the .bat script to the pack and the entries for it in the entries.ini...
_coming soon, don't hold your breath

User avatar
compstuff
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Florida

Post by compstuff » Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:11 am

Babyboy wrote:Nice work...The updated pack is great..

but i missed Kb936181

Security Update for Microsoft XML Core Services 4.0 Service Pack 2 (KB936181)
Hmmm.... I just did a new integration and I also show Kb936181 in MU along with kb931906 and I have no office installed... I used RVMI 1.53 and 102008r03.... I will try again with 112008r01

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:39 pm

These are the only updates I see, my update pack alone:

High-priority updates

Windows Genuine Advantage Notification (KB905474)
Windows Internet Explorer 7 for Windows XP

Optional software updates

Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions for Windows XP (KB943729)
Windows Search 4.0 for Windows XP (KB940157)
Windows Media Player 11
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0: x86 (KB829019)
Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1
Microsoft Silverlight (KB957938)

Anything else is caused by another addon or program installing a not quite up-to-date version of said components, neither MSXML4 nor CAPICOM are in SP3.

User avatar
compstuff
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Florida

Post by compstuff » Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:47 pm

I'm getting closer... I did an updated integration and this is where I am so far:

Changed my direct X addon back to a know nworking one, turned off my modem in the BIOS and I did not install some of the Dell D630 drivers and programs.

The install is perfect and MU shows exactly what you outlined.

I will now add some items one at a time and then check MU after each.

NEROMD
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:46 pm

Post by NEROMD » Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:31 pm

LLTD is present here?

User avatar
compstuff
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Florida

Post by compstuff » Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:17 pm

compstuff wrote:I'm getting closer... I did an updated integration and this is where I am so far:

Changed my direct X addon back to a know nworking one, turned off my modem in the BIOS and I did not install some of the Dell D630 drivers and programs.

The install is perfect and MU shows exactly what you outlined.

I will now add some items one at a time and then check MU after each.
NAILED IT :o

It's the Wave Systems EMBASSY Trust Suite that is causing the XML and CAPICOM updates to show in MU

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:31 pm

NEROMD wrote:LLTD is present here?
Nah, that was one reason I made this update pack, because others have needless extras being loaded by default.

User avatar
zhaoxiali
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 1:45 am

Post by zhaoxiali » Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:16 am

KB959252
Error message when you switch the operating system from a dual monitor setting to a single monitor setting on a Windows XP-based computer or on a Windows Server 2003-based computer that has the security update 954211 installed: "Stop 0x0000008E"

yumeyao
Moderator
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Taiyuan, Shanxi, PR China

Post by yumeyao » Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:03 am

KB959252 doesn't apply to redxii's pack. it only applies to QFE branch while redxii's pack contains win32k.sys of kb954211_GDR.
SYMPTOMS
On a Windows XP-based computer or on a Windows Server 2003-based computer, you install the security update 954211 by using the /b:RTMQFE switch. Then, when you switch the operating system from a dual monitor setting to a single monitor setting, you may experience any of the following symptoms:
...........................
Image
My work list(Hosted by dumpydooby)

DennyMK
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:03 am
Location: Macedonia

Post by DennyMK » Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:45 am

Thank you redxii. I was waiting for this update. I hope MS will stop releasing bootscreen replacing hotfixes.

Sm0ker
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: UK

Post by Sm0ker » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:10 pm

Thanks for the update redxii

SoKoOLz
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:53 am

Post by SoKoOLz » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:15 pm

OMG this is too fast!!
Thank you
Image

yoyosonic
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 12:40 pm

Post by yoyosonic » Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:16 pm

great work ,thanks a lot
``````````lovin you:p

zman519
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:53 am

Post by zman519 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:13 am

First off I'am new hear and want to say thanks to all the pack & addon makers :D Thanks

And now on to why i finely joined the forum. I was reinstalling XP on my main PC its a dual monitor setup ATI 1650 pro. & every time after reinstalling XP pro ( was running MCE 05 & it worked fine) i would disable the #2 monitor After enabling it to play a game & just testing my install, i would get BSOD
Image

& i think i have tracked down what was making the BSOD its a MS update kb954211 that updates the win32.sys

i found what this guy said http://forums.techarena.in/windows-update/1060067.htm

& then

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954211

&

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959252/


If any one is having that problem check out the MS links

User avatar
beats
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by beats » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:32 am

Thank you Red. :)

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:44 am

In my update pack? 'Cuz Microsoft says if the QFE win32k.sys is installed, mine has GDR. GDR only has critical fixes while QFE is like an experimental branch, and can fix problems not fixed in GDR but introduce new problems as well.

zman519
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:53 am

Post by zman519 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:22 am

redxii wrote:In my update pack? 'Cuz Microsoft says if the QFE win32k.sys is installed, mine has GDR. GDR only has critical fixes while QFE is like an experimental branch, and can fix problems not fixed in GDR but introduce new problems as well.
i just wanted to post that up & let people know about it cuz it was driving me crazy trying to fix it. i must of brunt 10 CD's :x

Sorry if i did not look into it far anuff as you did. i guess form what your saying i should have just used your pack from the start & i never would have found out about this problem nor had the headache. :D

i did use RVMUpdatePackSP3_1.0.1.7 but i did a search & saw kb954211 in yours. i'am just posting to help any one that was pulling there hair out trying to find the reason there dual monitor system was going crazy :wink:

As soon as i reinstalled (again :( ) and installed WindowsXP-KB959252-x86-ENU.exe the problem stopped

SHO_GuN
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:26 pm

Post by SHO_GuN » Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:56 pm

Well, I am curious.....

I don't see any mention of KB954430 in your pack, nor do I see msxml4.dll in your pack.

Yet when I use this pack, KB954430 does NOT show up in WU/MU.

When I do my obligatory attempt to update the last RVM Pack, KB954430 DOES show up in WU/MU.

What am I missing in this pack that is satisfying WU/MU as far as KB954430 goes?

tia

User avatar
5eraph
Site Admin
Posts: 4620
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Riverview, MI USA

Post by 5eraph » Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:13 pm

Windows XP does not ship with MSXML 4.0. The Microsoft Update website does not offer it as an optional download.

Ryan's update pack includes KB941833, which is vulnerable. redxii's update pack does not include MSXML 4.0, so there's no need to update what isn't there. ;)

SHO_GuN
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:26 pm

Post by SHO_GuN » Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:40 pm

Disregard - got it figgerd out after reading your post a couple of times.

newsposter
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:31 am

Post by newsposter » Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:50 pm

Doesn't MSXML v6 (and it's updates) completely replace/superceed v4 anyway?

User avatar
ENU_user
Posts: 1253
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:42 pm

Post by ENU_user » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:30 pm

thanks redxii for this fast update and to all the other addon makers around who made it a good one
hopefully I'm just an our away of the final! ;)

FrizzleFry
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:32 pm

Post by FrizzleFry » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:24 pm

zman519, I was getting a BSOD when I tried to disable a secondary monitor in my previous install. I did not save the screen but it did involve win32k.sys.

I was blaming the ATI Catalyst drivers for the BSOD but you might have found the actual problem. My previous install was based on Ryan's SP3 pack my current one is based on Red's October pack. I'll have to install the Catalyst drivers and see if I still get the BSOD.

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:30 pm

I've been thinking about adding MSXML4, but none of my apps, mostly freeware and open source, use MSXML4 and possibly don't use MSXML at all. Including would probably just introduce a new attack vector and need to be kept up to date.

Shwing
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:16 pm

Advanced INF Install Error

Post by Shwing » Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:37 pm

Hello Everyone,

first of all thank you for these update packs, they're a great help.

Here's my problem:
I used a clean SP3 CD > Test: OK
Added RVM Update 1.0.1 > Test: OK
Added RED Update r03 > Test: During the 13 Min portion of installation I get a window with the title "Advanced INF Install" and the following message:

Error creating process <rootsupd.exe /Q>. Reason: The System cannot find the file specified

The only way to continue the installation is if you click on the OK button in that window, otherwise, the installation won't continue automatically.

I have no idea what it means and was wondering if anyone else was getting the same error.[/img]

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:20 pm

You aren't adding both are you? One or the other.

Shwing
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:16 pm

YIKES!

Post by Shwing » Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:16 am

YIKES!

I guess that pretty much explains it then! I didn't get the memo :lol:

User avatar
Bhishmar
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:42 pm

Post by Bhishmar » Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:20 am

Hi redxii
I have a question!

I. I know that ur update pack is different from ryan's in the sense that ur contains only high-priority updates (w GDR branch).
My question is: IS IT OK, if I integrate ryans latest addon pack (1.9.0 dtd aug-2008) along with ur latest updatepack-112008-r03?
I know that usually ryan's addonpack is to be used along with ryans update-pack. Hence the question.

II. I am finding that Avira AntiVirus is reporting a virus with your latest updatepacks r02 & r03, in the file:XPSP3Upd.inf. (not sure about earlier versions!).
Virus or unwanted program 'HTML/Rce.Gen' I am assuming it is a false alarm! Please confirm.

Is the presence of this file XPSP3Upd.inf necessary in the Windows\inf folder even after windows installation? OR is it only required during the build process & during installation time? Can I delete it after windows installation, when the antivirus detects & prompts it? It is a nuisance every time to select option ignore for this file, when Virus-guard traps it.
regards

btw My Thanks & appreciation for your excellent work on bringing out this reliable pack, and also your help to this community.

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Sun Nov 23, 2008 4:12 pm

Ryan doesn't say anywhere that his addon pack can only be used with his update pack.

The inf isn't required after Windows is installed, and your AV is broken for saying my inf is a virus.

User avatar
trippinferret
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: Lakewood, N.S.W. Australia

Post by trippinferret » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:11 pm

Downloading now, will try it out.

User avatar
MrNxDmX
Moderator
Posts: 3112
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:33 am

Post by MrNxDmX » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:49 pm

Bhishmar, i downloaded latest pack from first post and scaneed using Eset Smart Security, which has up-to-date definitions. All is ok, no virus ;)

avneet25
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:25 am
Location: Fiji Islands
Contact:

Post by avneet25 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:04 pm

Bhishmar wrote:Hi redxii
I have a question!

I. I know that ur update pack is different from ryan's in the sense that ur contains only high-priority updates (w GDR branch).
My question is: IS IT OK, if I integrate ryans latest addon pack (1.9.0 dtd aug-2008) along with ur latest updatepack-112008-r03?
I know that usually ryan's addonpack is to be used along with ryans update-pack. Hence the question.

II. I am finding that Avira AntiVirus is reporting a virus with your latest updatepacks r02 & r03, in the file:XPSP3Upd.inf. (not sure about earlier versions!).
Virus or unwanted program 'HTML/Rce.Gen' I am assuming it is a false alarm! Please confirm.

Is the presence of this file XPSP3Upd.inf necessary in the Windows\inf folder even after windows installation? OR is it only required during the build process & during installation time? Can I delete it after windows installation, when the antivirus detects & prompts it? It is a nuisance every time to select option ignore for this file, when Virus-guard traps it.
regards

btw My Thanks & appreciation for your excellent work on bringing out this reliable pack, and also your help to this community.
Avira does pick it as virus .. but its a false postive

User avatar
trippinferret
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: Lakewood, N.S.W. Australia

Post by trippinferret » Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:37 pm

Just finished integrating and did a fresh install and everything worked perfectly. "excellent work"
Thanks heaps.

User avatar
Rhor
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: New York

Post by Rhor » Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:54 pm

Thank you for the update, avid user of your pack here.

Regards.
I know I was born and I know that I will die, everything in between is mine. I am mine.

http://rhor.deviantart.com

User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Windows Update vs Microsoft Update

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:21 pm

I notice you include both MU and WU. My understanding that it was generally one or the other. Is there a benefit or downside to having them both installed?

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:46 pm

MU checks for updates for other MS products like Office or Virtual PC. MU is an addon to WU, weighing at only 206KB I doubt muweb.dll could do it all by itself.

SamHaLe
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:08 am

Post by SamHaLe » Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:37 pm

Hi, thanks for this wonderful Update Pack (and all the others). It's exactly what I needed for my unattended XP CD. Great work!

I used RVMi 1.5.4 b08.3 to do the job:

0 Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP3 Corporate MSDN ISO
1 Redxii Windows XP Post-SP3 Update Pack 112008-r04
2 Redxii AMD K8 Processor Driver Version 1.3.2.0053 AddOn
3 Redxii DirectX 9.0c End-User Runtime AddOn
4 Redxii DirectX for Managed Code (.NET Framework) AddOn
5 RogueSpear .NET Framework V1.1 SP1 AddOn
6 RogueSpear Visual C++ 2005 SP1 and 2008 SP1 Redstributables Package AddOn
7 RogueSpear Java SE Runtime Environment V6.0 Update 10 AddOn
These are all true svcpack.inf and working PERFECTLY!

In addition I also used:
RogueSpear Microsoft .NET Framework V3.5 SP1 – Full
This is installed true RunOnceEx and also working PERFECTLY!


Just 1 small remark concerning the "Adobe Flash Player" in your Update Pack:

Adobe Flash Player isn't mentioned in "add or remove programs".


Thanks, great work!
Last edited by SamHaLe on Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:35 pm


SamHaLe
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:08 am

Post by SamHaLe » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:59 pm

Thank you!
Any chance of creating a separate WGAV AddOn without WGAN?
I don't think that already exists and is very useful. WGAN is not realy needed and don't like it (although I'm a legitimate user). WGAV is needed for visiting WU.

Thanks

SamHaLe
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:08 am

Post by SamHaLe » Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:15 pm

Hi again,

I found out that RogueSpear's WGAV Addon V1.7.69.2 is working PERFECTLY for WU!
It does NOT contain WGAN!

So my setup now looks like this:

0 Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP3 Corporate MSDN ISO
1 Redxii Windows XP Post-SP3 Update Pack 112008-r04
2 RogueSpear WGAV 1.7.69.2 Addon
3 Redxii AMD K8 Processor Driver Version 1.3.2.0053 AddOn
4 Redxii DirectX 9.0c End-User Runtime AddOn
5 Redxii DirectX for Managed Code (.NET Framework) AddOn
6 RogueSpear .NET Framework V1.1 SP1 AddOn
7 RogueSpear Visual C++ 2005 SP1 and 2008 SP1 Redstributables Package AddOn
8 RogueSpear Java SE Runtime Environment V6.0 Update 10 AddOn
These are all true svcpack.inf and working PERFECTLY!

In addition I also used:
RogueSpear Microsoft .NET Framework V3.5 SP1 – Full
This is installed true RunOnceEx and also working PERFECTLY!

With RogueSpear's WGAV Addon V1.7.69.2, everything for WU is working out of the box! No need to install KB899130 (WGAV) for using WU.
It is not the "latest" version but it seems working and WU is not updating it to any newer version (f.e like 1.8.0031.9).

The only High-priority updates IC are:

Windows Genuine Advantage Notification (KB905474) => do not need it
Windows Internet Explorer 7 for Windows XP => do not need it


Rgds
Last edited by SamHaLe on Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SamHaLe
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:08 am

Post by SamHaLe » Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:38 pm

mod: can you please delete this message :oops:

User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Fri Nov 28, 2008 12:04 am

redxii wrote:MU checks for updates for other MS products like Office or Virtual PC. MU is an addon to WU, weighing at only 206KB I doubt muweb.dll could do it all by itself.
I've been using Xable's Microsoft Update Engine v7.2.6001.788 and have been getting all updates. Would that mean that Xable's MU is really the equivalent of your WU and MU combined as they are in your update pack? If so, I think your update pack should better serve my needs than what I'm currently using. :D

Xable
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:38 pm
Contact:

Post by Xable » Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:27 pm

vioplujjnsjzfg wrote:I've been using Xable's Microsoft Update Engine v7.2.6001.788 and have been getting all updates. Would that mean that Xable's MU is really the equivalent of your WU and MU combined as they are in your update pack? If so, I think your update pack should better serve my needs than what I'm currently using. :D
MU requires WU, so to have a single MU addon it has to also include WU.
My update packs include just the high-priority updates, things such as WU/WUMU/WGA are seperate so you have a choice what to use. If you don`t want strictly high-priority updates and prefer MU in the same package redxii`s pack would probably suit you better. :)

User avatar
vioplujjnsjzfg
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by vioplujjnsjzfg » Fri Dec 05, 2008 11:59 am

Xable wrote:MU requires WU, so to have a single MU addon it has to also include WU.
My update packs include just the high-priority updates, things such as WU/WUMU/WGA are seperate so you have a choice what to use. If you don`t want strictly high-priority updates and prefer MU in the same package redxii`s pack would probably suit you better. :)
Thank you for the explanation. That's what I figured. I am actually using both yours and redxii's depending on who I'm building for. Your update pack gives greater control to the builder but I'm also finding redxii's update pack to be a great middle-of-the-road pack that includes oft-needed updates but doesn't go too far for my needs. Thanks to BOTH of you for the great service you provide :!: :D

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:04 pm

I'm thinking of not including WMP 9 updates. It will show as "Security Update for Windows XP Service Pack 3". If you actually use WMP on websites (I can't recall the last time I ever did) 10 or 11 will probably be the minimum requirement these days. Installing WMP 11 or security updates for either don't require a reboot at all.

And I have to include the full mrt file.. if I use the stub then it offers November's MSRT (even though it's December) or if I have just the version string then it will still offer November MSRT for download. They didn't pull December's from the Download Center.

scarface
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:25 am
Location: paris

Post by scarface » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:53 am

ok I have tested your november version and it works quite well. I removed flash 9 still in i386 folder because its useless and it seems your pack doesnt remove the old version. in fact the only problem was with ie7 by mrnxdmx : i integrated all with nlite and iexplore.exe wasnt in the program files. then i copied it and it worked.

scarface
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:25 am
Location: paris

Post by scarface » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:58 am

same problem with boogy wmp11 over redxi pack : everything is present but not wmplayer.exe. its a bit strange because entries are in txtsetup : wmplayer.exe = 100,,,,,,,,3,3 under [SourceDisksFiles.x86]

User avatar
redxii
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by redxii » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:21 pm

Try integrating from scratch, sounds like you've been using the same modified source for quite a while.

Post Reply