You could try posting just the updated files in the members section. Then people who are more likely to not delete the large packs, can go there, while the majority of users can go off the main site.RyanVM wrote:I used to do upgrade packs. They were a pain to maintain, however, and they did very little if anything to conserve bandwidth (in fact, I don't think it was uncommon for people to download both the upgrade pack and the full download as well, in effect using more bandwidth than before).
Where's the next version?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 3:22 am
I would suggest that you do NOT do an nLite installation. Just do the manual, its easy. Not hard at all, and in my experience, there are normally less problems (at the very least if something doesn't work, you KNOW its your own fault, not nLite's)...nLite...more detailed/ screen shot accompanied instructions starting fron A to Final finished version/update.
I haven't looked at the nLite guide, but the manual installation instructions are simple enough you should be able to get it workin just fine.
Also, have you integrated SP2? SP2 MUST be integrated in order for Ryan's pack to work properly.
If not try visiting http://unattended.msfn.org and try to learn a few things.
And, if you insist on doing the nLite installation, there are lots of people here who have gotten it to work successfully, so the guide can't be too bad.
Well, good luck!

-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:02 am
I'm sure the manual install works great by itself. But actually I had problems doing the manual install with using nlite to remove components and everything else. Then I tried doing everything with nlite including integrating ryan's pack and it worked flawlessly. Not to mention a heck of a lot faster than the integrate.exe thing.TJHart85 wrote:I would suggest that you do NOT do an nLite installation. Just do the manual, its easy. Not hard at all, and in my experience, there are normally less problems (at the very least if something doesn't work, you KNOW its your own fault, not nLite's)...nLite...more detailed/ screen shot accompanied instructions starting fron A to Final finished version/update.
I haven't looked at the nLite guide, but the manual installation instructions are simple enough you should be able to get it workin just fine.
Also, have you integrated SP2? SP2 MUST be integrated in order for Ryan's pack to work properly.
If not try visiting http://unattended.msfn.org and try to learn a few things.
And, if you insist on doing the nLite installation, there are lots of people here who have gotten it to work successfully, so the guide can't be too bad.
Well, good luck!
I think what's best to do is slip sp2 with nlite and then close out nlite.
Then open nlite and only integrate the 1.2.2 hotfix pack.
Then extract 1.2.2b pack to i386 and overwrite all.
Then open up nlite and do everything else and make the ISO.
Just open nLite, integrate SP2, integrate 1.2.2 @ the hotfixes section, then just before you click on "Make ISO", you manually extract 1.2.2b to i386, then click on "Make ISO". Done.Protagonist. wrote:I'm sure the manual install works great by itself. But actually I had problems doing the manual install with using nlite to remove components and everything else. Then I tried doing everything with nlite including integrating ryan's pack and it worked flawlessly. Not to mention a heck of a lot faster than the integrate.exe thing.
I think what's best to do is slip sp2 with nlite and then close out nlite.
Then open nlite and only integrate the 1.2.2 hotfix pack.
Then extract 1.2.2b pack to i386 and overwrite all.
Then open up nlite and do everything else and make the ISO.
Thank U Gentlemen for UR Kind instructions.
When I say I am ignorant about computer I really mean it. Someone will have to spoonfeed instructions to me step by step.
My assets a. CDwith already integrated SP2 b. Knowledge level NIL
Questions 1. How to integrate with nlite because when integrate page comes on nlite it does not show Ryan's 1.22 thing.
Do I download it again. It's properties show it to be 4.95 weightage/whatever.
2. what do i burn on cd the ISO image or the i386 folder.
Thank U
Major (Army)
When I say I am ignorant about computer I really mean it. Someone will have to spoonfeed instructions to me step by step.
My assets a. CDwith already integrated SP2 b. Knowledge level NIL
Questions 1. How to integrate with nlite because when integrate page comes on nlite it does not show Ryan's 1.22 thing.
Do I download it again. It's properties show it to be 4.95 weightage/whatever.
2. what do i burn on cd the ISO image or the i386 folder.
Thank U
Major (Army)
1. You have to browse to the file at the hotfix integration page... duh.GS Bhullar wrote:Thank U Gentlemen for UR Kind instructions.
When I say I am ignorant about computer I really mean it. Someone will have to spoonfeed instructions to me step by step.
My assets a. CDwith already integrated SP2 b. Knowledge level NIL
Questions 1. How to integrate with nlite because when integrate page comes on nlite it does not show Ryan's 1.22 thing.
Do I download it again. It's properties show it to be 4.95 weightage/whatever.
2. what do i burn on cd the ISO image or the i386 folder.
Thank U
Major (Army)
2. You burn the ISO image AS an image (e.g. Nero -> Menu Recorder -> Burn Image), that means that the contents of the ISO file will be extracted when written to the CD. This makes the CD bootable, since boot information is also stored in the ISO. If you burn the i386 stuff manually, the CD won't boot.
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:02 am
There are actually two files you need to be downloading.GS Bhullar wrote:I have diagnosed the problem. My download file is not proper, its power is only 4.95 kg but a proper download file has to have strength of 42.9 kg. But I m not being able to download full file. it is stopping at strength of 4.2 to 4.8-9 kg. what to do.
Major
The first one is found here:
http://ryanvm.msfn.org/updatepack.html
Down at the bottom where it says "full downloads" choose one of those. I recommend the full one. Then you download another file which is at the first post in this thread, the 1.2.2b pack full. The pack you are integrating is the 1.2.2 pack which is about 42.9MB large. After you integrate that you only extract the 1.2.2b pack to the 1386 folder and overwrite all.

-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:02 am
hi guys i have problem. i use nlite to integrate ryanpack and before integrating it gives me this:
Error!
H-Could not find file "F:\xpsp2prac\rvmtmp\SVCPACK.IN_". Please report this error if it´s unexpected. Write your message in English. Export and attach a preset of settings causing this issue if possible.
and at the end is button ok. can you help me where is problem? it occur on xpsp1 after integrating sp2. then i try tu integrate ryanpack 1.2.2. full.
after click on ok prcessing continues but when i try to install final iso it gives me a lot of errors
than you for your answre
Error!
H-Could not find file "F:\xpsp2prac\rvmtmp\SVCPACK.IN_". Please report this error if it´s unexpected. Write your message in English. Export and attach a preset of settings causing this issue if possible.
and at the end is button ok. can you help me where is problem? it occur on xpsp1 after integrating sp2. then i try tu integrate ryanpack 1.2.2. full.
after click on ok prcessing continues but when i try to install final iso it gives me a lot of errors
than you for your answre
Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
It probably can't contain anything huge, since the next wave of upgrades due to be ported back to XP - the Aero UI, the file system and the like - won't be done until Longhorn is done. It seems likely that it will just be IE7 and some security features.Protagonist. wrote:Apparently Service Pack 3 for Windows XP will contain many of the things that Longhorn will and will be released prior to Longhorn.
Re: Where's the next version?
It seems you get pissed off when anyone asks you about releases, and while I understand that it gets annoying with people asking I just want to mention (again) that it would be so great if you posted some sort of ETA?RyanVM wrote:Due to some major changes going into the next release (version 1.3.0), it is postponed indefinitely for the time being.
I know a LOT of people (like me) plan their installations around your releases. It would be cool to have SOME idea, even a rough estimate of days vs. weeks.
Thanks for your consideration.
I really don't know. I'm waiting on some stuff from other people at the moment.
Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 6:10 pm
It may depend on the version of nLite you're using. I know that with 1.0 beta 4 you cannot because it doesn't handle the archive files properly (svcpack.IN_ specifically, perhaps others). Your best bet I think is to integrate 1.2.2 and 1.2.2b manually, unpack svcpack.IN_ to get svcpack.inf, delete svcpack.IN_ and place svcpack.inf into the I386 directory, _then_ integrate your hotfixes as you normally would.
1.3.0 isn't ready to go yet, but I'll probably make a 1.2.3 release when the July fixes are released just to have something updated on my site.
Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
- RogueSpear
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:50 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Slightly OT, but thought it would be worth mentioning...
I've put ryanvm.net, msfn.org, btsunattended.net, etc.. basically all the places we go to everyday for this kind of topic matter, and put them in my trusted networks zone for both IE and Symantec Client Security. Haven't had a single download problem since. For good measure, open up cookie handling for these sites as well.
If you know how to secure your system to begin with, then opening yourself up to these reputable sites shouldn't be an issue anyway. Just a little sick of seeing all the complaints regarding download problems.
I've put ryanvm.net, msfn.org, btsunattended.net, etc.. basically all the places we go to everyday for this kind of topic matter, and put them in my trusted networks zone for both IE and Symantec Client Security. Haven't had a single download problem since. For good measure, open up cookie handling for these sites as well.
If you know how to secure your system to begin with, then opening yourself up to these reputable sites shouldn't be an issue anyway. Just a little sick of seeing all the complaints regarding download problems.
Microsoft Update
Ryan, have you tried Microsoft Update yet?
I tried it myself...not too sure about it, tho
I added Office 2003 into my latest UA and integrated all the available updates...
However, it seems that MSUpdate sees 5 updates for Office 2003 when I know I added them...even Office Update says all is good!

I tried it myself...not too sure about it, tho
I added Office 2003 into my latest UA and integrated all the available updates...
However, it seems that MSUpdate sees 5 updates for Office 2003 when I know I added them...even Office Update says all is good!


Chris Thomson
AKA OrcoXP
PHP/MySQL/phpMyAdmin 2 & 3 successfully running simultaneously on XP SP3 IIS.
AKA OrcoXP
PHP/MySQL/phpMyAdmin 2 & 3 successfully running simultaneously on XP SP3 IIS.
I was playing around with the astalavista's Office Tools and Microsoft Update myself a few nights ago.
Not only can MS Update not detect integrated updates, but it also does not agree with Office Update's list from a non updated install. There are the five common updates between after integrating SP1 into Office2003, but also each site lists an extra update that the other does not. I decided to integrate all seven to be on the safe side.
Here's the list of what I installed:
KB842532 - Service Pack 1 for Office 2003
KB873381 - Update for Office 2003 Grammar Checker
KB885828 - Update for Office 2003
KB887979 - Security Update for Word 2003
KB887980 - Update for Office 2003
KB887982 - Update for InfoPath 2003
KB892258 - Update for Office 2003 French Spelling Checker and Thesaurus
KB896999 - Update for Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter
I'd trust Office Update over MS Update. If you're going to update any preinstalled ActiveX controls, Ryan, may I suggest only the one(s) for Window's Update and not MS Update?

Not only can MS Update not detect integrated updates, but it also does not agree with Office Update's list from a non updated install. There are the five common updates between after integrating SP1 into Office2003, but also each site lists an extra update that the other does not. I decided to integrate all seven to be on the safe side.
Here's the list of what I installed:
KB842532 - Service Pack 1 for Office 2003
KB873381 - Update for Office 2003 Grammar Checker
KB885828 - Update for Office 2003
KB887979 - Security Update for Word 2003
KB887980 - Update for Office 2003
KB887982 - Update for InfoPath 2003
KB892258 - Update for Office 2003 French Spelling Checker and Thesaurus
KB896999 - Update for Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter
I'd trust Office Update over MS Update. If you're going to update any preinstalled ActiveX controls, Ryan, may I suggest only the one(s) for Window's Update and not MS Update?

So, what you are saying is that it is a matter of wrong configuration and if YOU try to download "1.2.2 to 1.2.2b Full" (first page of this post) this very minute you will succeed? Please do and let us know of what happened...RogueSpear wrote:Slightly OT, but thought it would be worth mentioning...
I've put ryanvm.net, msfn.org, btsunattended.net, etc.. basically all the places we go to everyday for this kind of topic matter, and put them in my trusted networks zone for both IE and Symantec Client Security. Haven't had a single download problem since. For good measure, open up cookie handling for these sites as well.
If you know how to secure your system to begin with, then opening yourself up to these reputable sites shouldn't be an issue anyway. Just a little sick of seeing all the complaints regarding download problems.
Regarding MU: It uses the same files as WU with the exception of one added DLL (muweb.dll). WUv6 is equally accessible with the same files.
Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
- RogueSpear
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:50 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
07/07/2005 10:52PM (Eastern Time) No problem downloading 1.2.2 ro 1.2.2b Full.Thruba wrote:So, what you are saying is that it is a matter of wrong configuration and if YOU try to download "1.2.2 to 1.2.2b Full" (first page of this post) this very minute you will succeed? Please do and let us know of what happened...
Re: Microsoft Update
Orcoxp, i have same problems as you do.orcoxp wrote:Ryan, have you tried Microsoft Update yet?
I tried it myself...not too sure about it, tho
I added Office 2003 into my latest UA and integrated all the available updates...
However, it seems that MSUpdate sees 5 updates for Office 2003 when I know I added them...even Office Update says all is good!
![]()
Open Office Update, there is no update.Open Ms Update, says 5 needed updates...Interesting...I think, it is a problem for MS,anyway...
I actually did the updates and they did not come back...do you have MS Office in the default folder?
This is sorta different than the issue that I found with Windows Media Connect and Windows Messenger...
If Windows Media Connect is install to a folder other than the default it will keep installing but always show up as an additional update in Windows Update or MS Update.
And for Windows Messenger, I have 5.1.0680 installed and it'll ask me if I want to uninstall it first.
This is sorta different than the issue that I found with Windows Media Connect and Windows Messenger...
If Windows Media Connect is install to a folder other than the default it will keep installing but always show up as an additional update in Windows Update or MS Update.
And for Windows Messenger, I have 5.1.0680 installed and it'll ask me if I want to uninstall it first.
Chris Thomson
AKA OrcoXP
PHP/MySQL/phpMyAdmin 2 & 3 successfully running simultaneously on XP SP3 IIS.
AKA OrcoXP
PHP/MySQL/phpMyAdmin 2 & 3 successfully running simultaneously on XP SP3 IIS.
I was a beta tester of WUv6/MU, and I seem to remember hearing about that bug already during the testing phase. So for what it's worth, I'm pretty certain MS is aware of the problem. Whether or not they intend to fix it is an entirely different matter 

Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:05 pm
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=168amirali_esh wrote:Ryan, do you have any plan to integrate WU6 in your next release?
So my guess would be: no.
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:02 am
Eh?ViVa wrote:http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=168amirali_esh wrote:Ryan, do you have any plan to integrate WU6 in your next release?
So my guess would be: no.
Integrate Microsoft Update 6.
Green = Completed
They're the same thing, except MU includes one extra file. A working MU install will be compatible with WUv6 as well.
Get up to $200 off on hosting from the same people who host this website!
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2357
Ok My friend and I made a great copy with n-lite and added all the updates.... Is there an update that can fix this little big with Nvidia chipset video cards. When i watch videos the colors are all screwed up and very bright... I tried everything codecs and everything theres some update here thats doing it... If anyone has a fix thanks! 

- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
@NDgamer, I bet i know what's your problem! It just happened to me last Saturday
I believe this is a bug for v77.72 
:: Right-click on your Desktop and select 'Properties'
:: Click 'Settings' tab -> 'Advanced' button -> Geforce video tab (this is created by the driver).
:: Select 'Color Correction' on the sidebar.
Under 'Apply color changes to:" ... if you select to change the 'Overlay' settings, the Gamma is around 3.61 <-- extremely bright!
When playing videos, it's considered overlay and this pesky bug causes the video to have gamma correction > 1.0!
My quick fix to this is to choose 'All' and adjust Brightness/Contrast/Gamma -> 100%/100%/1.00.
This should solve the problem!


:: Right-click on your Desktop and select 'Properties'
:: Click 'Settings' tab -> 'Advanced' button -> Geforce video tab (this is created by the driver).
:: Select 'Color Correction' on the sidebar.
Under 'Apply color changes to:" ... if you select to change the 'Overlay' settings, the Gamma is around 3.61 <-- extremely bright!
When playing videos, it's considered overlay and this pesky bug causes the video to have gamma correction > 1.0!
My quick fix to this is to choose 'All' and adjust Brightness/Contrast/Gamma -> 100%/100%/1.00.
This should solve the problem!