[Updated] XP SP3 Update Pack 02.10-01

amburi · Post by **amburi** » Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:34 am

Hi. I'm sorry if I missed something, but if I integrate this pack no matter with nlite or integrator I get the same error during setup "an error occured copying file aikjbt.sys"... Did I do something wrong?

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:14 am

Never heard of aikjbt.sys, Google doesn't come up with anything for aikjbt.sys.

amburi · Post by **amburi** » Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:15 am

It seems I found the solution. In case somebody is interested http://www.technologyquestions.com/tech ... error.html Disabling the DAEMON Tools SPTD driver worked fine:)

Babyboy · Post by **Babyboy** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:01 pm

Nice work...The updated pack is great..

but i missed Kb936181

Security Update for Microsoft XML Core Services 4.0 Service Pack 2 (KB936181)

Post by **5eraph** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:13 pm

I believe KB936181 only appears as a high priority update when installing Office 2003.

Babyboy · Post by **Babyboy** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:28 pm

5eraph:
I believe KB936181 only appears as a high priority update when installing Office 2003.

Maybe..but i have Office 2007..

No big deal.then a'm sorry for this message....

dumpydooby · Post by **dumpydooby** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:14 am

Red, I love your work and I eagerly await your next release.

jdrom17 · Post by **jdrom17** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:32 am

Going to give this a shot and hopefully without errors.

Thanks for all the hard work.

vit100 · Post by **vit100** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:53 am

hi
Tried to install RED_XP_SP3_UpdatePack_072008-r04.7z in integrated SP3 and got error:

Any ideas?

IDK · Post by **IDK** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:32 pm

Did you use nlite or ryan integrator

Zyx_Maiden · Post by **Zyx_Maiden** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:36 pm

I have download this Pack 3 times form the 2 links and I always get a wrong MD5 Hash. Is the file corrupt or the Hash not updated?

The hash I got is :MD5: EDEE24ED33E9332DD53ED92B4157F13D

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:51 pm

I still had the hash from r03, but my website had the correct one. And apparently I had the correct SHA1 sum.

As for the error, I don't know. You didn't list any other addons you were using or integration method (nLite or RVMI). Upload txtsetup.sif somewhere I can download it and maybe I'll see what went wrong with [WinntDirectories].

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:35 pm

Added today's security updates if anyone is still interested.

LonGleY-orig · Post by **LonGleY-orig** » Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:20 pm

Thanks!

mindwarper · Post by **mindwarper** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:21 am

Thanks redxii!!!
Now what I am curious about you mention RVM Integrator 1.5.4
Now where can 1 find or download that one?

yumeyao · Post by **yumeyao** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:31 am

malicious removal tool 2.1
code:
F3889559-68D7-4AFB-835E-E7A82E4CE818
you can edit yourself.

Sm0ker · Post by **Sm0ker** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:34 am

Thanks for the update redxiii

beats · Post by **beats** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:41 am

Thanks red, you're fast.

maveric73ph · Post by **maveric73ph** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:46 am

Thanks for this! I have a question re: removal of WBEM fix bec. its included in RVMi - but I use nlite on my other UACD's... will this cause any problems for nlite users?

Post by **user_hidden** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:52 pm

thanks RED for your hard work.

crashfly · Post by **crashfly** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:27 pm

maveric73ph wrote:Thanks for this! I have a question re: removal of WBEM fix bec. its included in RVMi - but I use nlite on my other UACD's... will this cause any problems for nlite users?

The problem *was* originally with an option in RVMI, however it was not an issue in nlite since nlite automatically fixed the problem. Therefore, there is not any issues with that fix and nlite.

richy759 · Post by **richy759** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:45 pm

mindwarper wrote:Thanks redxii!!!
Now what I am curious about you mention RVM Integrator 1.5.4
Now where can 1 find or download that one?

+1

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:46 pm

I forgot to add this to the changelog:
- Updated Malicious Software Removal Tool to version 2.1 (August 2008)

It was just left out of the changelog, it wasn't a silent update.

Siginet has already decided to include the WBEM fix in the integrator, there is always the addon for the WBEM fix before 1.5.4 is released if anyone still experiences that problem. As of now I haven't experienced it with the update pack alone, nor does it with my DX addon.

(No one said 1.5.4 was released, removing the WBEM fix was a preempt)

mf3imp · Post by **mf3imp** » Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:09 pm

Wow, I've noticed that MS Update on a italian version of xp sp3 doesn't require anymore 898461, the package installer. My simple test is in vpc, with just sp3 slipstreamed, to check what hotfix and other stuff are required by ms update. Can someone confirm this? Thank

EDIT: it seems that it's automaticaly download and installed, but not displayed in winupdate. There are all entries in the registry, I'm checking the log file of windows update.

Tr110022 · Post by **Tr110022** » Sat Aug 16, 2008 8:32 am

thanks redxii for update

code65536 · Post by **code65536** » Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:20 am

You should also include KB950582 (this was previously a Vista/2K8-only update, but Microsoft quietly and without fanfare extended the offering to 2K3 and XPSP2/SP3 on the Aug 12)

Happy-Dude · Post by **Happy-Dude** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:46 pm

Since RyanVM's Windows XP Post-SP3 Update Pack was just released ...

I need an opinion:
~~Which update pack should I use?

There are some things here, some things there. Some extras here, some extras there.

Looks like RyanVM has more security fixes for default Windows XP programs (like Messenger and Outlook), whereas redxii's pack doesn't seem to included these.

Do I need MSXML 4.0 SP2 (Includes KB941833 Hotfix) ? Would redxii's update pack include it later?

Also, what is the significance of ResetWMI ?

Thanks guys. I really appreciate it

!!

code65536 · Post by **code65536** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:01 pm

Happy-Dude wrote:~~Which update pack should I use?

This has been discussed before. Nutshell is, this is a more conservative pack. Far fewer fixes (fewer KBs and using GDR instead of QFE), but lower risk of instability. redxii is the most conservative, Onepiece is the least conservative, and RVM is about somewhere in between.

Happy-Dude wrote:Also, what is the significance of ResetWMI ?

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5285

Post by **RyanVM** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:06 pm

code65536 - YGPM

beats · Post by **beats** » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:18 am

code65536 wrote:This has been discussed before. Nutshell is, this is a more conservative pack. Far fewer fixes (fewer KBs and using GDR instead of QFE), but lower risk of instability. redxii is the most conservative, Onepiece is the least conservative, and RVM is about somewhere in between.

In fact, xable's updatepack is the most conservative. His pack only includes the High Priority WU updates.

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:26 pm

Well, the term "stable" depends on what you're talking about. If you need a hotfix to fix a problem that causes stop errors then you should probably get the hotfix. If you aren't having any problems, either can cause problems/have bugs but IMHO usually in the past a hotfix has caused problems because the user has done something they shouldn't.. like screw with permissions on system folders (MS05-051).

zhaoxiali · Post by **zhaoxiali** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:31 am

Image Mastering API v2.0 (IMAPIv2.0) for Windows XP (KB932716)
Brief Description
Image Mastering API v2.0 (IMAPIv2.0) enables IMAPIv2 dependent applications to stage and burn images to CD and DVD optical storage media.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... c4dd2f147b

compstuff · Post by **compstuff** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:14 pm

redxii: all I can say is that I have used your last 2 update packs and they are rock solid stable... THANKS!!!

compstuff · Post by **compstuff** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:05 pm

I just used the lates tr01 pack and MS Update showed KB954154... I will try again since it was one of the days with mistake after mistake so I can't really be sure I didn't screw up...

keloo05 · Post by **keloo05** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:16 pm

compstuff wrote:I just used the lates tr01 pack and MS Update showed KB954154... I will try again since it was one of the days with mistake after mistake so I can't really be sure I didn't screw up...

KB954154 is a WMP 11 update, so it's normal to show up in MU. To have a fully up to date Xp disc, I would recommand you to integrate WMP 11 and all specific updates with Booogy's Slipstreamer: http://www.boooggy.org/slipstreamer/

compstuff · Post by **compstuff** » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:50 pm

Thanks very much for the feedback... actually I did use Booogy's Slipstreamer but didn't have KB954154 so that's an easy fix which means this pack is perfect...

eSc-AvAtAr · Post by **eSc-AvAtAr** » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:25 pm

wups2.dll is referenced 2 times in entries.ini

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:15 pm

Not a big deal.. the integrator only copies the wups2.dll line once. I'll fix it locally.

lqdwax · Post by **lqdwax** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:44 am

Hey. First thanks for the pack. I am having a issue when i integrate the newest version of your pack i am getting a "rootsupd.exe" error during install. I noticed you have the root certificate update include. but my error specifies that i cant find the file. I am using xp sp3 and use nlite 1.45 to integrate. any thoughts. THANKS

beats · Post by **beats** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:54 am

nLite 1.45 is rather old. You might want to try 1.49.1 first to see if that works.

eroder · Post by **eroder** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:04 am

Is there a mirror please. I just cannot download from A-Drive. Keeps going int a loop.

Thanx in advanze for all the hard work.

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:26 pm

Firefox seems to have problems downloading from adrive.

Not putting it on my website because people direct link to the .7z.

FrizzleFry · Post by **FrizzleFry** » Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:20 am

I can dl with Firefox fine... I just cannot use a dl manager.

beats · Post by **beats** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:11 am

Thank you for the update Red.

Nowind · Post by **Nowind** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:44 am

Thanks, quick and working, except for KB956391. WU says it's not installed, it could be just on my computer...?

SHO_GuN · Post by **SHO_GuN** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:06 am

Nowind wrote:Thanks, quick and working, except for KB956391. WU says it's not installed, it could be just on my computer...?

OK, so its not just me. I tried updating the last released file, as usual, while waiting for the peeps who know what they're doing to release their work.

All was fine except KB956391. All but one registry entry would take.

When this version was released, I saw the registry entry in question is listed twice, the second time to be ran at T-13.

When finished, this single registry entry is still not correct and triggers the prompt for KB956391 in WU/MU.

Code: Select all

HKLM,"%ACTIVEXCOMP%\{0002E510-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}","Compatibility Flags",0x00010001,0x400

Xable · Post by **Xable** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:59 pm

956391 needs a reg entrie re-writen as late as possible because it`s overwritten during registering. One easy way and the way I went, is to let nLite deal with it

add to entries.ini

Code: Select all

[registry_addreg]
HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\ActiveX Compatibility\{0002E510-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}","Compatibility Flags",0x00010001,0x400

That adds it to nLites ini which is applied twice at the end of install, knowone`s reported any problems as yet.

redxii · Post by **redxii** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:35 pm

Are you using nLite? I used/only test on RVMI (1.5.3), KB956391 didn't show up.

Nowind · Post by **Nowind** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:03 pm

I use nLite, as I have with your other packs. First time there's been a "problem".....

Xable, do you mean entries.ini in the updatepack?

SHO_GuN · Post by **SHO_GuN** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:41 pm

My comment was based on using nLite.

KB956391 shows up in MU for me with your update pack.

If I integrate the hotfix itself with nLite, it does not show up.