Onepiece XP Post-SP3 AIO Update Pack FINAL
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
Do you use a clean source CD.
@UpdatePack developer
There is a BUG at Add and Remove Programs this Microsoft Tools "Silverlight" "DirectX for Managed Code" "Image Mastering API" "SmartCard Driver" "MSXML4" "Windows Rights Management Client" Should not be added at:
Add and Remove Programs -> Add/remove Windows Components
But schould be added at:
Add and Remove Programs -> Change or Remove Programs
The original installer does this also because if a newer version comes out the uninstaller won't work anymore or you get problems to install the newer version like i had with the new Silverlight.
And to add this "MicrosoftUpdate" "DirectXUpdate" "WMP11 Roll Back" "IE8 Roll Back" in Add and Remove Programs makes no sens.
Hop this gets fixed. For now i have removed this entries with a addon.
For me it's still the main UpdatePack but sametimes this UpdatePack reminds me of this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQWNGLv8w74
@UpdatePack developer
There is a BUG at Add and Remove Programs this Microsoft Tools "Silverlight" "DirectX for Managed Code" "Image Mastering API" "SmartCard Driver" "MSXML4" "Windows Rights Management Client" Should not be added at:
Add and Remove Programs -> Add/remove Windows Components
But schould be added at:
Add and Remove Programs -> Change or Remove Programs
The original installer does this also because if a newer version comes out the uninstaller won't work anymore or you get problems to install the newer version like i had with the new Silverlight.
And to add this "MicrosoftUpdate" "DirectXUpdate" "WMP11 Roll Back" "IE8 Roll Back" in Add and Remove Programs makes no sens.
Hop this gets fixed. For now i have removed this entries with a addon.
For me it's still the main UpdatePack but sametimes this UpdatePack reminds me of this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQWNGLv8w74
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
@Outbreaker: It's not a bug but a feature. When MS release a newer version, changes the uninstaller too. so previous uninstaller is automatically removed from Add/remove Windows components.
However Onepiece will take note of your opinion.
@Yumeyao: nothing particular. he adds a simple [EditFile] to fix the specific issue posted by Geforce.
Thanks for beta 2: we'll try it and report the result
EDIT: seems that beta 2 hasn't fixed that specific problem. Tested with this addon: txtsetup.sif is processed until 999 lines and dosnet.inf stops at 490
However Onepiece will take note of your opinion.
@Yumeyao: nothing particular. he adds a simple [EditFile] to fix the specific issue posted by Geforce.
Thanks for beta 2: we'll try it and report the result
EDIT: seems that beta 2 hasn't fixed that specific problem. Tested with this addon: txtsetup.sif is processed until 999 lines and dosnet.inf stops at 490

Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
Hi everyone,
I just want to give "heads up" to OnePiece for an excellent add-on - many thanks.
This version is fantastic, for once I have zero problems with installation and absolutely clean system logs over the last couple of days.
My integration with Ryan's last post-SP3 pack somehow didn't seem quite right. Then I tried OnePiece's OIA with nLite, good stuff - respect ! Nonno - thanks for your support mate!
I just want to give "heads up" to OnePiece for an excellent add-on - many thanks.
This version is fantastic, for once I have zero problems with installation and absolutely clean system logs over the last couple of days.
My integration with Ryan's last post-SP3 pack somehow didn't seem quite right. Then I tried OnePiece's OIA with nLite, good stuff - respect ! Nonno - thanks for your support mate!
Well, I have some registry tweaks imported at runonce which set WMP11 as I want, so the first window is by-passedPasha_ZZZ wrote:Launch WMP once - shortcuts will be created.conan wrote:What changes should I do to this update pack to create desktop and quick launch shortcut for WMP11 ?
I know how to create shortcut using third party utilities (XXMKLINK 1.0.0.1).

Should I need to modify WMP.inf?
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Probably no.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
I solved my problem with desktop and quick launch icons for WMP11, using a inf file like this:
That was ripped from a bigger inf file.
Code: Select all
[Version]
Signature="$Windows NT$"
[Optional Components]
XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks
[XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks]
OptionDesc="Microsoft Windows XP x86 Registry Tweaks"
Tip="Microsoft Windows XP x86 Registry Tweaks"
Modes=0,1,2,3
AddReg=XP_x86.AddReg
;This works nearly at T24...
[XP_x86.AddReg]
HKLM,"%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks",0x00020000,"rundll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSectionEx XP_x86.inf,XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks,,4,N"
;This works at T13...
[XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks]
AddReg=PreRunOnce.AddReg
;This works at first boot...
[PreRunOnce.AddReg]
;Call the user tweaks section... (for all users)
HKU,".DEFAULT\%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks",0x00020000,"rundll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSectionEx XP_x86.inf,AfterUserStart,,4,N"
;This runs after first desktop loads... (for all users)
[AfterUserStart]
ProfileItems=WMP11DesktopItemAdd,WMP11QuickLaunchItemAdd
[HKU.DelReg]
HKU,".DEFAULT\%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks"
HKU,"S-1-5-18\%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks"
HKU,"S-1-5-19\%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks"
HKU,"S-1-5-20\%RUNONCE%","XP_x86_Registry_Tweaks"
[Strings]
RUNONCE="Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce"
[WMP11DesktopItemAdd]
Name = "Windows Media Player", 0x0000008, 16384
CmdLine = 16422,"Windows Media Player","wmplayer.exe /prefetch:1"
WorkingDir = 16422,"Windows Media Player"
InfoTip = "@%%systemroot%%\inf\unregmp2.exe,-160"
DisplayResource = "%systemroot%\inf\unregmp2.exe",4
[WMP11QuickLaunchItemAdd]
Name = "Windows Media Player", 0x0000008, 16410
CmdLine = 16422,"Windows Media Player","wmplayer.exe /prefetch:1"
SubDir = "Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch"
WorkingDir = 16422,"Windows Media Player"
InfoTip = "@%%systemroot%%\inf\unregmp2.exe,-160"
DisplayResource = "%systemroot%\inf\unregmp2.exe",4
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
I have had problems with Silverlight uninstall/repair/upgrade as well, usually when doing repair installs. Can't remember if I've tried updating silverlight on any machines installed with an older integrated version. Typically I just have to find the silverlight msi files in \windows\installer, delete them, install msicuu2, and remove the Silverlight uninstall entries. Then the new version will install fine afterwards.
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
@nic01:
No, it isn't and it never will be, I suppose, just like any other localized version, different from english and italian.
You could try to localize it by yourself (the "search" function of the forum would help you) providing all the GR localized hotfixes and components and modifying the inf files with the localized strings.
@conan:
You could use this:
ONEPIECE_WMP_PLUS_ADDON.cab
http://ifile.it/wjqpi5l/onepiece_wmp_plus_addon.cab
Hash MD5 C31221A4E8514691B8050D661D4B70FD
but it will never be implemented in the update pack: Onepiece prefers to keep things as Microsoft does
No, it isn't and it never will be, I suppose, just like any other localized version, different from english and italian.
You could try to localize it by yourself (the "search" function of the forum would help you) providing all the GR localized hotfixes and components and modifying the inf files with the localized strings.
@conan:
You could use this:
ONEPIECE_WMP_PLUS_ADDON.cab
http://ifile.it/wjqpi5l/onepiece_wmp_plus_addon.cab
Hash MD5 C31221A4E8514691B8050D661D4B70FD
but it will never be implemented in the update pack: Onepiece prefers to keep things as Microsoft does
Last edited by nonno fabio on Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
@nonno fabio
It's very good that OnePiece keep things as Microsoft does (about WMP11 setup) with no additional tweaks.
All of us we can customize the Windows setup as we need using add-ons and this is the best way.
With my above method we can add or remove shortcuts as we want and where we want since it's working from RunOnce.
Thanks for your work guys!
It's very good that OnePiece keep things as Microsoft does (about WMP11 setup) with no additional tweaks.
All of us we can customize the Windows setup as we need using add-ons and this is the best way.
With my above method we can add or remove shortcuts as we want and where we want since it's working from RunOnce.
Thanks for your work guys!
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
LOL at least about WMP and IE
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
Ok nonno ,
i m already getting some help in the forum from yumeyao ,a bit difficult for me though to understand instructions.But i ll get to it finally i suppose.
Ok, thanks and....keep up with the good work mates
I ll be at :
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7154
i m already getting some help in the forum from yumeyao ,a bit difficult for me though to understand instructions.But i ll get to it finally i suppose.
Ok, thanks and....keep up with the good work mates
I ll be at :
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7154
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
yes, you can, if you follow these steps:DirtyTodd wrote:Great Work....Can I downgrade the Internet Explorer to V7 if yes how..
- download the new IE7 Addon Maker and create your own addon (don't use the True Addon or any different IE7 solution, because they need to be updated)
- integrate your addon after the UpdatePack with RVMi (we suggest RVMi because it better handles [ObsoleteFiles] ini section)
@sergo: yes; see first post list
Last edited by nonno fabio on Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
Hello nono,
I integrated onepiece2.2.4, at the same time "deintegrated" Silverlight, Windows Search and Smartcard. The code installed without the "mscorier" message.
It displays the MS Activation Demand message. From Chile I have to make a phone call (those digit strings are an imposition) to activate.
Then I call MS Update and it tells me that it needsl the .NET 3.5 Service Pack 1 and the .NET family pack (
I did not know that .NET even has a family! I always thought it was software. Microsoft is turning humane? Or is it a family of spiders in a net trying to catch us?)
I looked into "Add or Remove Programs" and there is nothing to add or remove.
Therefore I repeated the above integration/desintegration with the complete download of the SP1 (about 230MB). It integrated without messages. The install, however failed. There was some process, similar to a batch process except that it was not the typically black DOS window, which issued a message that stated that the code it tried to update was not installed.
I thought that maybe I forgot to install the "family pack" and I looked around and found some MS webpage where one can download three files, each much smaller, which are to be installed in a prescribred ascending .NET release order. The integration was error free. The installation failed with three of those "DOS-like" windows where I had to cancel manually. It could not find the code.
End of report of my experience. What follows are a few questions:
How important is .NET 3 and 3.5? Is it sufficient to have .NET 2 plus all the appropriate service packs? Also are .NET 1 and .NET 1.1 needed?
It is convenient to have everything in one piece; I imagine that some modules depend on others that are previously integrated or installed. The Onepiece pack can solve this once and forever. But from an architectural point I have a question. I have the impression that .NET, DirectX, Windows Search, and maybe other systems ride on top of any one of the (newer) versions of Windows. They depend on the OS but are not part of the OS. Could this be structured differently? One code of all the updates to XP, and all the rest in individual files which are installed in a required order because of the dependencies. Now we can chose to integrate Silverlight or not, IE7 or I8, Windows Search or not, etc as long as the requirements (dependent code sections) are integrated before. It still would be "Onepiece" in a macro sense because the subcomponents are fashioned consistently, and that is where it would shine compared to picking similar subcomponents from different integrators who have different approaches that could result in incompatibilites. (Reading the message trails, I have the impression that there are different ways to "cut the pie", some are more simple than others)
This is a simplistic, top-down view. However, I am ignorant about Windows technology, and maybe this is only a dream because the Windows installation architecture may not have clear boundaries.
In any case, I will keep trying to "master" Onepiece.
Thanks for this impressive piece of code.
I integrated onepiece2.2.4, at the same time "deintegrated" Silverlight, Windows Search and Smartcard. The code installed without the "mscorier" message.
It displays the MS Activation Demand message. From Chile I have to make a phone call (those digit strings are an imposition) to activate.
Then I call MS Update and it tells me that it needsl the .NET 3.5 Service Pack 1 and the .NET family pack (

I looked into "Add or Remove Programs" and there is nothing to add or remove.
Therefore I repeated the above integration/desintegration with the complete download of the SP1 (about 230MB). It integrated without messages. The install, however failed. There was some process, similar to a batch process except that it was not the typically black DOS window, which issued a message that stated that the code it tried to update was not installed.
I thought that maybe I forgot to install the "family pack" and I looked around and found some MS webpage where one can download three files, each much smaller, which are to be installed in a prescribred ascending .NET release order. The integration was error free. The installation failed with three of those "DOS-like" windows where I had to cancel manually. It could not find the code.
End of report of my experience. What follows are a few questions:
How important is .NET 3 and 3.5? Is it sufficient to have .NET 2 plus all the appropriate service packs? Also are .NET 1 and .NET 1.1 needed?
It is convenient to have everything in one piece; I imagine that some modules depend on others that are previously integrated or installed. The Onepiece pack can solve this once and forever. But from an architectural point I have a question. I have the impression that .NET, DirectX, Windows Search, and maybe other systems ride on top of any one of the (newer) versions of Windows. They depend on the OS but are not part of the OS. Could this be structured differently? One code of all the updates to XP, and all the rest in individual files which are installed in a required order because of the dependencies. Now we can chose to integrate Silverlight or not, IE7 or I8, Windows Search or not, etc as long as the requirements (dependent code sections) are integrated before. It still would be "Onepiece" in a macro sense because the subcomponents are fashioned consistently, and that is where it would shine compared to picking similar subcomponents from different integrators who have different approaches that could result in incompatibilites. (Reading the message trails, I have the impression that there are different ways to "cut the pie", some are more simple than others)
This is a simplistic, top-down view. However, I am ignorant about Windows technology, and maybe this is only a dream because the Windows installation architecture may not have clear boundaries.
In any case, I will keep trying to "master" Onepiece.
Thanks for this impressive piece of code.
Working with computers since 1960 and still haven't caught up. Sigh!
Re: Onepiece XP Post-SP3 AIO Update Pack v2.2.4-090326
Hmmmm ... no please? No thank you? I would suggest you read his comments about requests ...
Besides, how is IE8 horrible? No details on that. I am sure we do not need to know then.nonno fabio wrote:You don't like any of the components included in OnePiece's XP Update Pack?
If you prefer a different configuration of Onepiece AIO Update Pack I suggest you to use RyanVM Update Pack with your preferred addons and you'll get your own XP disc without the need to remove anything.
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
yes...he's made it pretty clear that what's in the pack is in the pack. there are plenty of other options if IE8 isn't for you.
i've been using it since the beta phase and while i don't think it will replace firefox as my primary browser, it's certainly a step up from 7, and infinitely better than 6 was.
i've been using it since the beta phase and while i don't think it will replace firefox as my primary browser, it's certainly a step up from 7, and infinitely better than 6 was.
I know this is off-topic, but I wonder why people hate IE8 so much. Is is some blind knee-jerk anti-M$ response? For the record, I absolutely hate IE6 simply because of the amount of time and energy (from a developer's point of view) that must be spent to work around IE6 bugs. The web would be a much better place if IE6 would just die a quick death. Plus, it's slow and has a poor UI, but those are secondary to the greater sin of a buggy engine. IE8 is much more standards-compliant and much better, and there is no reason whatsoever someone should prefer IE6 or even IE7 over IE8.
(Of course, my browser of choice is Firefox, but IMO, anything that helps put an end to IE6's life is welcomed, even if it's another version of IE.)
(Of course, my browser of choice is Firefox, but IMO, anything that helps put an end to IE6's life is welcomed, even if it's another version of IE.)
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
- Location: Estonia
I´ll tell you why! It makes computer run sluggish and damn slow, if you dont have multi-core processor or lots of memory. I´d say way too much security, like a real-time antivirus scanning all the time for bad internet sites that may not exist any more. It is a burden to CPU. Some sites or web services do not support it at all. Not a big problem, but there is no translation of this IE version into my language also.
Thats not only my personal opinion. If you find, that it´s false, tell me!
Thats not only my personal opinion. If you find, that it´s false, tell me!
Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice
- Kelsenellenelvian
- Moderator
- Posts: 4383
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
LOL I JUST installed XP on a celeron 366mHz w\384 megs ram with this addon.
Using AVG and IE8 with cable net and browsing is actually not really that bad.
It doesn't slow the pc down AT ALL, Yes it uses ram and does take longer to use than my new PC but it is still far better that IE7 and while a bit slower than IE6 I feel much safer and more comfortable with it on the old P.O.S. system.
What web sites? Have you seen the compatability view button? I have yet to run into any sites that run on it. Plus I didn't need to change my site at all to make it work with IE8.
(I did not remove anything with nLite and did not disable any services yet)
Using AVG and IE8 with cable net and browsing is actually not really that bad.
It doesn't slow the pc down AT ALL, Yes it uses ram and does take longer to use than my new PC but it is still far better that IE7 and while a bit slower than IE6 I feel much safer and more comfortable with it on the old P.O.S. system.
What web sites? Have you seen the compatability view button? I have yet to run into any sites that run on it. Plus I didn't need to change my site at all to make it work with IE8.
(I did not remove anything with nLite and did not disable any services yet)
I have no problems with IE8 with an old 8-year-old laptop (older than XP!). It's not resource-intensive (turn off the phishing filter). Nowadays, the biggest resource hog when browsing is, by far, that disgusting immorality known as Flash--the amount of resources spent by the browser itself is so low that any difference between IE6 and 8 is relatively negligible. The claim that IE8 is unsuitable for old, weak systems is dubious, as I can attest from personal experience that there's nothing wrong with that (but of course, Firefox with either NoScript or FlashBlock would be even better).
Though it looks like Kel has me beat in the old-machines dept. But I actually use my old machine fairly regularly.
Though it looks like Kel has me beat in the old-machines dept. But I actually use my old machine fairly regularly.
I agree on it.code65536 wrote:I know this is off-topic, but I wonder why people hate IE8 so much. Is is some blind knee-jerk anti-M$ response?
One of my roommates just hate M$ and hate IE8 by no reasonable reason. Even he prevented me installing IE8 on my another roommate's computer.
He is the typical and living example that there is a kind of people always follows other's sayings, never has his own opinion on things.




Since I don't have experience with IE6, 7, or 8, I will take the suggestions and integrate the latest version.
Just to share my experience, let it be known that I have been very satisfied with Firefox for many years.


Thank you all!

Working with computers since 1960 and still haven't caught up. Sigh!
- nonno fabio
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: Northern Italy
- Contact:
Usually it takes more time for Onepiece to upload his pack than to build itsT0n3r wrote:some new updates since 2.2.4 ?? on ms update

I guess it's ready and this could be the changelog:
EDIT: uploaded.Added:
KB923561 (supersedes KB960763)
KB945184
KB951159
KB952004
KB956572 (supersedes KB960419 & KB960496)
KB958580 (supersedes KB958106)
KB959426 (supersedes KB960417)
KB960064 (supersedes KB960380-v2)
KB960803
KB961373 (supersedes KB951698)
KB961451-v2 (supersedes KB959237)
KB961729 (supersedes KB955069)
KB961742 (supersedes KB960139)
KB965220 (supersedes KB957808 & KB958877)
KB967705
KB967756 (supersedes KB958756)
KB967882
KB968730
KB968764 (supersedes KB949033 & KB949764)
KB969111 (supersedes KB932521)
KB969179
KB969262 (supersedes KB932578)
KB969356-v2
KB969442
Windows PowerShell(TM) 1.0
added the option to uninstall IE8 (from Windows Component Wizard and a clean XP source)
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
- Oron123
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:30 pm
- Location: In the tavern in the village of Fleur de lis near Calypso - StS
- Contact:
Thank you for the new update. Appreciated!
An advice for life: Do not argue with people who have no knowledge.
They aren't aware of what they say/write and will drag you down to their level.
www.TecHappens.com
They aren't aware of what they say/write and will drag you down to their level.
www.TecHappens.com
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:30 am
- Location: Estonia
Just wanted to say...You forgot to update an entry in the contents list. Update for root certificates is still february version. If you have the time you can look it over.
About IE8...if all of this is true that here is said than it must be something about wrong settings...dunno.
About IE8...if all of this is true that here is said than it must be something about wrong settings...dunno.

Most important question is why and everything begins of your choice
Silverlight, Smart Card Driver & Windows Search removal addons still available.
Disable_WGAN_AddOn
Remove_NETFX1.1SP1_DMX_AddOn.7z
Disable_WGAN_AddOn
Remove_NETFX1.1SP1_DMX_AddOn.7z
- Outbreaker
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:06 am
Sorry the 2 bugs i posted are no UpdatePack Bugs. I have done a settings that causes this bugs. grrr
Last edited by Outbreaker on Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- OnePiece Alb
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Albania
- Contact:
Thank youAcheron wrote:Thanks for adding all these new hotfixes to the pack and providing this list of changes.
When updating my CD I also found KB952595 got updated -> v3, but it's not listed on your pack.

tell the truth and ricktendo64 that is giving me a hand in this release, I was not even aware of half of the fix added in this release,
thanks again for the alert, I had not seen this fix
@All
the Remove AddOn has been updated, why, and also added Remove_DirectX_Post-SP3_AddOn, I will come tomorrow when his Nonno Fabio put all links in place.
Ciao a tutti.
unable to download small RVMIntegrator-only addons (updated 2009-03-19)
Hey nonno fabio,
Thanx 4ur updatepack..
but i m unable to download small RVMIntegrator-only addons (updated 2009-03-19)..it's saying that file not found error..
pls upload them again.
Thanx 4ur updatepack..
but i m unable to download small RVMIntegrator-only addons (updated 2009-03-19)..it's saying that file not found error..
pls upload them again.